Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
Showing Original Post only (View all)Elizabeth Warren Retreats From Medicare for All [View all]
Why would anyone go through all the trouble of running for president just to get up on stage and talk about whats not possible? This is the question Elizabeth Warren posed to thumb-faced millionaire John Delaney at a Democratic debate in July, as paraphrased by her campaign in a tweet, in response to Delaneys characterization of bold policies as impossible promises. And yet it is the logic of possible and impossible, of disarming yourself in an attempt to appease your opponent before youve met upon the battlefield, that undergirds Warrens newly released plan to split up the passage of Medicare for All into two steps: First, the enactment of a public option and then, two years later, the passage of a separate bill to achieve single-payer. It signals that Warren believes that only a public option is possible, without requiring her to say so out loud.
Warren has struggled to voice unequivocal support for single-payer. In March, she said there were different pathways to universal coverage, including expanding Medicaid and a buy-in mechanism. She seemed to find her bravery in October, when she released her plan to pay for Medicare for All. Questionable as the proposal wasit relied on a regressive head tax of employers, instead of progressive payroll taxesit did tie her definitively to a single-payer health care plan in a way that she had previously avoided. Few could say she didnt own the policy once she had outlined the taxes that would pay for it, which is arguably the hardest part of the single-payer pitch. Only now, shes blown all that up.
Warrens latest plan ostensibly provides for the transitioning to Medicare for All. In reality, it is a clearer indication that she has settled for the public option, like most of the rest of the field. Within the first 100 days of her administration, she proposes to pass a bill allowing anyone to buy into Medicarewhile providing it free of charge to children under 18 and anyone making less than 200 percent of the federal poverty level ($51,500 for a family of four). Her administration would use budget reconciliation to avoid the Senate filibuster and pass with only 51 votesthough this process would still require Democratic squishes like Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema to find something resembling conviction.
Warrens proposal would cap premiums at 5 percent of incomewhich would be competitive with most, if not all, employer-sponsored insurance; competing plans among the Democratic field peg the cap at 8 percent. The covered benefits would match those enumerated in Bernie Sanderss Medicare for All bill. Confusingly, she also claims the bill would gradually decrease to zero the cost-sharing, like premiums and co-pays, in subsequent years. This is essentially saying the public option would morph into free healthcare at some pointlike Medicare for All, but without the abolition of private insurance. Who but the obscenely rich would keep paying for private insurance if theres a free public option that covers everything? And why would such a plan be easier to pass than Medicare for All? Those questions remain unanswered.
Warren has struggled to voice unequivocal support for single-payer. In March, she said there were different pathways to universal coverage, including expanding Medicaid and a buy-in mechanism. She seemed to find her bravery in October, when she released her plan to pay for Medicare for All. Questionable as the proposal wasit relied on a regressive head tax of employers, instead of progressive payroll taxesit did tie her definitively to a single-payer health care plan in a way that she had previously avoided. Few could say she didnt own the policy once she had outlined the taxes that would pay for it, which is arguably the hardest part of the single-payer pitch. Only now, shes blown all that up.
Warrens latest plan ostensibly provides for the transitioning to Medicare for All. In reality, it is a clearer indication that she has settled for the public option, like most of the rest of the field. Within the first 100 days of her administration, she proposes to pass a bill allowing anyone to buy into Medicarewhile providing it free of charge to children under 18 and anyone making less than 200 percent of the federal poverty level ($51,500 for a family of four). Her administration would use budget reconciliation to avoid the Senate filibuster and pass with only 51 votesthough this process would still require Democratic squishes like Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema to find something resembling conviction.
Warrens proposal would cap premiums at 5 percent of incomewhich would be competitive with most, if not all, employer-sponsored insurance; competing plans among the Democratic field peg the cap at 8 percent. The covered benefits would match those enumerated in Bernie Sanderss Medicare for All bill. Confusingly, she also claims the bill would gradually decrease to zero the cost-sharing, like premiums and co-pays, in subsequent years. This is essentially saying the public option would morph into free healthcare at some pointlike Medicare for All, but without the abolition of private insurance. Who but the obscenely rich would keep paying for private insurance if theres a free public option that covers everything? And why would such a plan be easier to pass than Medicare for All? Those questions remain unanswered.
(more....)
https://newrepublic.com/article/155756/elizabeth-warren-retreats-medicare
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
124 replies, 5881 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
124 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This critiique of Warren, which you should read in its entirety, was writtens by a woman, and
highplainsdem
Nov 2019
#7
Most qualified? How? I understand liking her plans, personality, even ideology, but most
emmaverybo
Nov 2019
#29
That, if it were to transpire, would not give her greater qualifications for office. No matter how
emmaverybo
Nov 2019
#48
She is an academic, an economic scholar. Biden is not. He has a broad range of other strengths
emmaverybo
Nov 2019
#54
We're not electing a Debater-in-Chief. I've competed in debates, and I don't confuse
highplainsdem
Nov 2019
#50
They matter most for college debate judges. And Biden's calm, thoughtful, compassionate, and
emmaverybo
Nov 2019
#55
In the artificial world of debate competition, yes. In the real world, and especially the real
highplainsdem
Nov 2019
#57
Yes! This and this, his FP creds, are crucial in the qualifications America and the world need.
emmaverybo
Nov 2019
#77
Domestic economic policy is important, but foreign policy and relations can make the difference
emmaverybo
Nov 2019
#110
Whether she is the "best and most qualified person running" is your subjective view. That she won't
still_one
Nov 2019
#106
Miscalculating on the centerpiece of one's candidacy could be an important failure to consider
emmaverybo
Nov 2019
#43
Voicing what millions of Americans, many Democrats, feel borders on Trumpism? Why do you
emmaverybo
Nov 2019
#78
and as long as the dems keep repeating that it will be a self fulfilling prophecy.
SterlingPound
Nov 2019
#117
the truth would be that people like biden profit from the insurance companies and have zero interest
SterlingPound
Nov 2019
#124
This was anything but a "brilliant" move on Warren's part. Read the entire piece.
highplainsdem
Nov 2019
#6
The rankings on DU and the eventual nominee haven't always matched, to put it mildly.
highplainsdem
Nov 2019
#35
Let's hope there's a real, substantive exploration of this by the media this election cycle!
JudyM
Nov 2019
#97
Wow. Hope people read the entire thing. The rest of it is even more critical of Warren's
highplainsdem
Nov 2019
#5
I'm a woman who supported HRC and who wants our nominee to be the candidate with the
highplainsdem
Nov 2019
#36
Settle? Lucky such a qualified, experienced, and knowledgeable candidate as Biden
emmaverybo
Nov 2019
#39
I think most people agree that it is unlikely that ANY candidate could pass MFA in year one.
thesquanderer
Nov 2019
#24
Elizabeth went after Biden first. The others went after Warren because she was not truthful about
helpisontheway
Nov 2019
#65
I think Warren was avoiding creating a sound bite for Republicans to use against her in an ad
dlk
Nov 2019
#67
The difference is Bernie was honest about the middle class being taxed, so no scrutiny warranted.
Skya Rhen
Nov 2019
#105
other candidates health care proposals are paper thin and get no scrutiny. so it goes.
Kurt V.
Nov 2019
#16
Plans that include protecting and improving Obamacare, Medicaid, and Medicare are not thin. These
emmaverybo
Nov 2019
#86
The ability to pass even a plan like this through budget reconcilliation is highly doubtful.
tritsofme
Nov 2019
#28
Probably helps in Primary, but in General she's still branded as "MFA, even if you don't want it."
Hoyt
Nov 2019
#31
Warren is looking for a workable plan to provide affordable health care for all Americans.
Nitram
Nov 2019
#47
I don't see where she's "backing off", just explaining how to transition from one system
Fiendish Thingy
Nov 2019
#51
I am good with this and appreciate her listening to what was being said when standing so strongly
Jewls2
Nov 2019
#58
Is this consider a walk back or flip flop? Thought she had strong convictions
FloridaBlues
Nov 2019
#60
*I* am "the OP", thank you. One wonders why you don't address "the OP" directly....
George II
Nov 2019
#83
Nothing to unpack. You bashed me for posting an article from The New Republic....
George II
Nov 2019
#88
The New Republic was the first publication to carry an article chronicling the web of Trump's
emmaverybo
Nov 2019
#89
They've been doing it for more than 100 years (1914), but I guess they're not pure enough for some.
George II
Nov 2019
#93
Ha ha. But any challenge on it brings out a prickly side. She was quite uncomfortable when the
emmaverybo
Nov 2019
#90