Why isn't state revealing identities, locations of people monitored for Ebola in Pa?

[uppityperson]

25. What you say as "far simpler..." is what they are doing.

Last edited Wed Oct 29, 2014, 10:57 PM - Edit history (1)

"supervised self-monitoring for anyone known to be exposed (not just temperature checks, but also reporting of other early warning symptoms, and spot checks to verify compliance), self-quarantine at the first sign of symptoms until they are proven not to be Ebola."

They are supervising themselves, self monitoring for temps and other symptoms, and self quarantining when symptoms appear. None failed to cooperate, none vanished though if that were to happen, I could see supervised monitoring. For health care workers that is. General public, I would prefer to be monitored by a health care worker.

What "Two of the 3 self-monitoring health care workers blew it"? 1 nurse called CDC for advice, 1 doctor self isolated and called for help before his temp got to reportable level.

There was no need to monitor people on the plane she flew on, or to clean the bowling alley and whatever the restaurant was the dr went to except to try and calm public panic out of an "abundance of caution" which I think more education about it would've been better.

No one has gotten ebola in the USA except for those 2 nurses. None of the HCW returning or travelers coming into the country over the last 5 months have resulted in ANY infections in the community.