Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]AAO
(3,300 posts)19. I said that as a wraing to the Repukes who seem to be clueless. Yes, I must have a caveman agenda.
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Fortunately they do not represent women, just themselves. Good jury decision.
sabrina 1
Jul 2014
#26
I will not play their game - they don't own the english language nor do they understand it.
AAO
Jul 2014
#7
It should have been alerted. And what the response says is that DU juries are frequently
cali
Jul 2014
#8
One more time: It is a statement that women are crazed and vindictive when rejected by men.
cali
Jul 2014
#24
I'm referring to idiom you referenced; it's source and history and why it's sexist.
cali
Jul 2014
#36