Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Female Army Vet Accused of Murdering Her Three Daughters, Ages 3, 2 and 2 Months [View all]blm
(113,053 posts)45. No - the photo of the fetus in the womb is not there. Your OP uses a photo op image
that includes a fetus in the womb, NOT the photo of the baby shot by its mother.
Perhaps you were trying to express something else in your post?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
78 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Female Army Vet Accused of Murdering Her Three Daughters, Ages 3, 2 and 2 Months [View all]
951-Riverside
May 2014
OP
It is a horrible story, but based on the info available, she may not have even finished
MADem
May 2014
#8
Those are FAR more likely possibilities than flashbacks from an Army career she did not have
MADem
May 2014
#61
yeah, everyone knowns that being sexually assaulted makes one become a homicidal maniac
TorchTheWitch
May 2014
#11
Look at the photoshopped image - it adds an unrelated fetus in the womb pic to the story.
blm
May 2014
#49
Adding an unrelated fetus in the womb pic to the photoshopped image isn't responsible, either.
blm
May 2014
#46
Yes, and maybe the OP could provide some proof that she WAS sexually assaulted!
MoonRiver
May 2014
#31
No - the photo of the fetus in the womb is not there. Your OP uses a photo op image
blm
May 2014
#45
And just what evidence removed any doubt that this was caused by what you say caused it?
cleanhippie
May 2014
#62