Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
185. It's not just trolling..it's an utter violation of Michael Hasting's privacy rights.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 03:05 PM
Jun 2013

Last edited Fri Jun 21, 2013, 09:08 AM - Edit history (1)

if Mr Hastings consulted an attorney in this country regarding a criminal matter or anything else he and his estate have a privacy right. if Jennifer Robinson is licensed to practice anywhere in the United States she would be disbarred for revealing this confidence.

Ruh roh ..... Lil Missy Jun 2013 #1
I didn't want to laugh but I did. Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #2
Shame. avaistheone1 Jun 2013 #44
I laughed at the Scooby Doo reference. I have been very upset about Hastings death all day... Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #78
I know exactly what you mean. eShirl Jun 2013 #113
Good question I rarely come here anymore Mosaic Jun 2013 #205
Jungle drums pscot Jun 2013 #3
Hit job? blkmusclmachine Jun 2013 #4
No idea. Wikileaks also tweeted this but the meaning is unclear to me Catherina Jun 2013 #6
Non-public would = private. Cracklin Charlie Jun 2013 #19
Thanks Charlie, Looks like we both got nothing Catherina Jun 2013 #22
"Non public complication?" MADem Jun 2013 #25
All good questions Catherina Jun 2013 #52
It could be an "inside baseball" swipe at his wife. MADem Jun 2013 #72
The 'non public' tweet preceded the claim about the FBI. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #74
Odd phrasing, though. Why not "work-related?" MADem Jun 2013 #76
Wikileaks is trolling for attention, ghoulishly so. nt geek tragedy Jun 2013 #79
Hastings didn't contact the Wikileaks attorney? Got a link to that? sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #100
Suggesting a link between that and his death is trolling geek tragedy Jun 2013 #120
It's not just trolling..it's an utter violation of Michael Hasting's privacy rights. msanthrope Jun 2013 #185
Wikileaks doesn't believe in anyone's right to privacy. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #187
I'm trying to find out if she is practicing in the US. I will file a bar complaint if she is. If msanthrope Jun 2013 #190
If someone screams out loud Aerows Jun 2013 #191
That was Ken Starr's reasoning when he tried to violate Vince Foster's civil rights after he msanthrope Jun 2013 #193
Who ended up on the right side of the ruling? n/t Aerows Jun 2013 #194
The dead. nt msanthrope Jun 2013 #195
Color me totally confused Catherina Jun 2013 #86
"...has a very serious non-public complication" ReRe Jun 2013 #94
You're probably right. I hope they follow up soon Catherina Jun 2013 #101
Well, it still could mean anything--absolutely anything. MADem Jun 2013 #111
Or, given his acknowledged history, maybe he was drunk or high. pnwmom Jun 2013 #82
Here come the smears. How despicable. That was 13 years ago and he was a 'recovering' alcolic sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #102
I absolutely know what it means. Do you? pnwmom Jun 2013 #103
Maybe he received an emergency phone call that someone was in trouble? Maybe someone was sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #106
You're right that this is an almost unimaginable loss for everyone who cared for him pnwmom Jun 2013 #107
Given the FBI's recent history, I wouldn't want to be questioned ... alone. Eddie Haskell Jun 2013 #128
There's nothing like old history, say the Federal Witness Protection Program 1975... Octafish Jun 2013 #189
Yeah that's it, he was drunk or high. Good grief. nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #152
Could have been. zappaman Jun 2013 #162
I am guessing you hate the idea of conspiracies. Just a guess. nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #171
You appear to love them. n/t pnwmom Jun 2013 #184
I think that some deserve investigation. Democracy is all about openness. rhett o rick Jun 2013 #204
That's the most common reason for driving like he did in the middle of the night. nt pnwmom Jun 2013 #183
Are you kidding me? Stop it! nt babylonsister Jun 2013 #5
Edited. Nevermind. I see I was mistaken to give you the benefit of the doubt. n/t Catherina Jun 2013 #7
I can't believe you said that... zeemike Jun 2013 #68
Gawker ( I think...am on my phone) has an alleged video of the crash...and it is FIERY. AzDar Jun 2013 #8
Did you watch it? Catherina Jun 2013 #10
I did watch it... it appears to be just after the accident, he apparently hit a tree. AzDar Jun 2013 #12
In one of the videos you can see what looks like a fire hydrant gushing in the median FarCenter Jun 2013 #15
I just watched the video. Something's not right. A witness said the car was going ~100 mph Catherina Jun 2013 #16
Can a car be rigged so it accelerates uncontrollably? reformist2 Jun 2013 #28
Probably....perhaps even by remote control. HooptieWagon Jun 2013 #40
Ask Toyota/Lexus. EOTE Jun 2013 #85
Yes Eddie Haskell Jun 2013 #129
Wrong zappaman Jun 2013 #69
Yeah. It's the usual utter crap DevonRex Jun 2013 #81
Given that the FBI has exonerated all 150 agents who've shot and killed, Eddie Haskell Jun 2013 #130
Plausible Denial Octafish Jun 2013 #146
Yikes! They've got a manual for that? Eddie Haskell Jun 2013 #198
"But not this guy" who once crashed a car after driving drunk geek tragedy Jun 2013 #91
'when i was 19'. HiPointDem Jun 2013 #95
14 years ago when he was 19. Wow, the smears didn't take long to start. And just what does sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #110
We're talking about explanations as to how this happened. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #121
No 'we're' not. IF we were speculating as to how this happened, we would sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #168
Give us a break. stopbush Jun 2013 #138
Do you notice how some want so badly to dismiss events like this quickly. They immediately go to rhett o rick Jun 2013 #156
Do you notice how badly some want this to be more than an accident zappaman Jun 2013 #160
I want to keep an open mind. He had important, powerful enemies that have unlimited budgets rhett o rick Jun 2013 #170
I liked his work fine. zappaman Jun 2013 #172
Personally I think it was most likely an accident. And if I didnt, I wouldnt try to shut down the rhett o rick Jun 2013 #177
I have little doubt that Snowden would've met with an untimely end, Marr Jun 2013 #164
If Snowden is smart he will keep some important information for insurance. rhett o rick Jun 2013 #167
You dont sound like a fan of Mr. Hastings. Even so I would hope you could show some respect. nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #157
Really? zappaman Jun 2013 #158
It was gawker--you see a guy from the neighborhood with a garden hose, the FD hadn't gotten there MADem Jun 2013 #21
Not to seem like an expert... Cracklin Charlie Jun 2013 #27
SMH. We are all Glenn Beck now. JaneyVee Jun 2013 #9
No shit. Disgusting. nt babylonsister Jun 2013 #11
You speak well enough for yourself. JackRiddler Jun 2013 #65
We're not on tv or publishing speculation as fact to the general public. Eddie Haskell Jun 2013 #131
The timing on this is too coincidental for my taste Hydra Jun 2013 #13
I hope we find something out from wikileaks or the other people he was working with n/t Catherina Jun 2013 #18
At what poit in his career would the timing NOT be "too coincidental"? arcane1 Jun 2013 #30
Well, considering he was writing against the NSA program Hydra Jun 2013 #35
I saw an article expressing those exact same thoughts. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #36
You're not supposed to post Jones stuff here, jsyk n/t Hydra Jun 2013 #41
I'm not posting it for its merits, I'm pointing out the parallels between geek tragedy Jun 2013 #42
Regardless, that sort of thing starts flame wars, which is why you should get rid of that Hydra Jun 2013 #46
Um, wha? geek tragedy Jun 2013 #48
you're posting it to smear by association. HiPointDem Jun 2013 #96
I wonder if the "Clinton Body Count" guys post at DU. nt geek tragedy Jun 2013 #14
I wouldn't doubt it Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #29
While I understand some folks are trying to imply nefarious deeds by the gov't does it make sense okaawhatever Jun 2013 #17
Michael Hastings did get pretty radical in that TYT clip, 4:20 - 5:00. reformist2 Jun 2013 #20
I hadn't listened to the whole thing when I posted. Just did now. You may be on to something Catherina Jun 2013 #32
These military guys pride themselves on being men of their word, too. reformist2 Jun 2013 #39
I know. That's what you get for pursuing the truth and writing it Catherina Jun 2013 #60
Obama did it, in the front seat, with a candlestick. Whisp Jun 2013 #23
From naive incompetent to evil spying mastermind CakeGrrl Jun 2013 #47
This message was self-deleted by its author Catherina Jun 2013 #50
Apologies, Catherina. Whisp Jun 2013 #67
This message was self-deleted by its author Catherina Jun 2013 #97
No you do treestar Jun 2013 #87
Let's just say I wouldn't put it past the feds to do something like cutting brake lines... backscatter712 Jun 2013 #24
Hey, you keep your calm and patient reasoning OUT of this!! arcane1 Jun 2013 #31
I find your irresponsible conspiracy mongering to be without honor. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #34
I truly hope you're not a vegetarian. Or a non-smoker. Or a teetotaler. EOTE Jun 2013 #90
Funny how how some presume conspiracy without proof, as long as it justifies still_one Jun 2013 #151
Wisest not to put anything past anyone. Can't wait to hear what the wikileaks lawyers shares n/t Catherina Jun 2013 #45
Which is a really stupid way to kill someone jberryhill Jun 2013 #54
There have been a few who have gone down in small planes Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2013 #61
Which is even a stupider way to kill someone Major Nikon Jun 2013 #123
expensive Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2013 #197
Cut his brake lines? Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #77
PLONK! nt geek tragedy Jun 2013 #80
It's not necessary anymore. They've got Boston brakes now. Eddie Haskell Jun 2013 #199
OH FUCK Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #26
Careful, you'll pull a muscle stretching like that n/t Cal Carpenter Jun 2013 #33
I'm not saying anyone here is doing that Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #53
People are only hinting at it here, probably cuz they know they'll get PPR'd geek tragedy Jun 2013 #73
You have a theory? Hydra Jun 2013 #37
Ya..I have a theory regarding his death Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #38
Yup, and that's certainly a possiblity. Hydra Jun 2013 #43
Bingo! We have a winner! stopbush Jun 2013 #62
I predict this to be the next outrage treestar Jun 2013 #88
are you saying........ gopiscrap Jun 2013 #49
the government? Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2013 #63
At 4 am, just hours after contacting a lawyer about being investigated by the FBI, DesMoinesDem Jun 2013 #51
Apparently it's legit if you don't ask any questions Hydra Jun 2013 #55
Is that the deal? Catherina Jun 2013 #58
I agree with Daniel, the truth ALWAYS comes out Hydra Jun 2013 #59
Same here. That's why I wish Wikileaks would hurry up with it Catherina Jun 2013 #66
Ya, I saw it earlier Hydra Jun 2013 #70
These times are getting too complicated Catherina Jun 2013 #92
Er, any brand new car is going to burst into flames if your run over a fire hydrant, rip open stopbush Jun 2013 #64
It's actually ridiculous *not* to be suspicious in this case. reformist2 Jun 2013 #71
And it's actually ridiculous not to wonder about alcohol or drugs pnwmom Jun 2013 #84
No-one has discounted he may have been under the influence... HooptieWagon Jun 2013 #93
Upthread that's called "smearing". OilemFirchen Jun 2013 #139
Well, until we hear more its a possibility. HooptieWagon Jun 2013 #153
Absolutely. OilemFirchen Jun 2013 #154
Whatever helps you get through the day. stopbush Jun 2013 #137
That same videographer (who was out following leads on Justin Beiber's misdeeds, oddly enough) MADem Jun 2013 #98
No answers to your questions but thanks for posting that n/t Catherina Jun 2013 #108
he was in Los Angeles for Work JI7 Jun 2013 #112
Actually, 3 times the speed limit... zappaman Jun 2013 #200
Anyone think James Gandolfini's Death is connected to this ? and Obama just happens to be in Europe JI7 Jun 2013 #56
you're right. oh nose what's next still_one Jun 2013 #75
Go to sleep... to much of a good thing is great if the AM is cool alittlelark Jun 2013 #83
LOL treestar Jun 2013 #89
A tropical storm born in Kenya BainsBane Jun 2013 #116
Don't forget the Kennedy Assassination BainsBane Jun 2013 #115
Pfthhh cliffordu Jun 2013 #57
Tues night, when I got home... ReRe Jun 2013 #99
It wouldn't be exactly a shock Catherina Jun 2013 #109
sometimes people have car veganlush Jun 2013 #104
do we have to stoop to the veganlush Jun 2013 #105
So now Obama is murdering journalists? BainsBane Jun 2013 #114
i smell straw. HiPointDem Jun 2013 #117
So what is the point then? BainsBane Jun 2013 #118
more straw. HiPointDem Jun 2013 #119
Evidently that was too complicated of a question BainsBane Jun 2013 #122
not complicated at all, just irrelevant & diversionary. like straw men are. as is the implied HiPointDem Jun 2013 #124
Expecting someone to read your mind BainsBane Jun 2013 #125
I told you exactly what was on my mind. The OP has nothing to do with Obama. The OP is HiPointDem Jun 2013 #126
Thanks HiPointDem. This new tactic is quite something. The investment too. n/t Catherina Jun 2013 #135
Incredibly LAME. Nowhere is Obama mentioned or implied.YOU make this about Obama Catherina Jun 2013 #133
Lots of anger and no point made BainsBane Jun 2013 #134
Sorry it's not one comment. You've done this sort of thing before to other people Catherina Jun 2013 #136
Wow, so thin skinned BainsBane Jun 2013 #181
Are you trying to start a discussion with that remark? Or start a flamewar. nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #159
I was trying to figure out what the point of the OP was BainsBane Jun 2013 #161
"many others"? Show me the post that ties this with Obama? Some here are interested in what really rhett o rick Jun 2013 #175
Govt., Obama, what's the difference? BainsBane Jun 2013 #178
Sorry. The Wikileaks story stinks. Hastings had worked for Newsweek and had been an editor struggle4progress Jun 2013 #127
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2013 #132
Vince Foster.... Bobbie Jo Jun 2013 #140
Another complicated and vague string of posts. Would anyone be kind enough to give a ladjf Jun 2013 #141
Summary: Obama BAD! Scurrilous Jun 2013 #143
The death of a journalist who covered stories people didn't want him to cover Catherina Jun 2013 #147
Thanks. nt ladjf Jun 2013 #207
If Jennifer Robinson was a lawyer in this country, she'd be disbarred for msanthrope Jun 2013 #142
please delete the empty space reorg Jun 2013 #196
I will do so. nt msanthrope Jun 2013 #202
A short list of journalists who asked too many questions who ended up suddenly dead... Octafish Jun 2013 #144
Thanks, this is a keeper. Please consider adding Aaron Swartz to your list Catherina Jun 2013 #148
Thank you. Will do. Mr. Swartz was a truth seeker and truth teller. Octafish Jun 2013 #186
Mine too Catherina Jun 2013 #192
Yes but they all used drugs, drank alcohol and drove too fast. And anymore conspiracy talk rhett o rick Jun 2013 #163
A perfectly sulfurous destiny, indeed. Octafish Jun 2013 #188
I know that authoritarians dont like whistle-blowers, protestors, conspiracy theorists, liberals, rhett o rick Jun 2013 #203
Proof? allin99 Jun 2013 #145
You need to ask their lawyer. Catherina Jun 2013 #149
lawyers are liars, he's full of it, there's no proof. allin99 Jun 2013 #150
But we are keeping an open mind arent we??? nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #166
I think there are a lot of questions ohheckyeah Jun 2013 #155
Definitely. I hope we get some answers over the next few days, weeks Catherina Jun 2013 #165
I don't discount anything at this point. ohheckyeah Jun 2013 #169
Me neither. Blind Trust is not, has never been, the name of this game Catherina Jun 2013 #173
Splitting the Sky died in March 2013 xiamiam Jun 2013 #174
I do wish snot Jun 2013 #176
I didn't know Michael Hastings, but the YT clip makes me want to learn more about him. pacalo Jun 2013 #179
MIC Damage Control Unit 4 to NSA Strawman 6, do you copy? Zorra Jun 2013 #180
You're not kidding Catherina Jun 2013 #182
If you're not disturbing the comfortable, you're not doing it right Hydra Jun 2013 #201
Thanks Hydra, That's how I feel about it too lol n/t Catherina Jun 2013 #206
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hours Before His Death Mi...»Reply #185