Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Want to let the Sinister Six know your feelings? [View all]otchmoson
(68 posts)20. And this is mine.
Wheres the line between unethical and corrupt?
I'll be surprised if the public perception of the Supreme Court doesn't fall even further than the current dismal approval measure. Taking away women's autonomy was unimaginable; considering that a single individual is immune from criminal prosecution is worse. The activism, the lack of ethics, the arrogance (followed by Trump-like whining about how mean people are to you) are the self-same characteristics of narcissism and privilege that define the former President (and obviously your Supreme Leader). I don't wish you good luck, nor do I urge you to do better--I don't think it is within your character. My only hope is that a changing electorate may lead to term limits, an enforceable code of ethics, and an increase in the number of justices that will place you in a minority.
I'll be surprised if the public perception of the Supreme Court doesn't fall even further than the current dismal approval measure. Taking away women's autonomy was unimaginable; considering that a single individual is immune from criminal prosecution is worse. The activism, the lack of ethics, the arrogance (followed by Trump-like whining about how mean people are to you) are the self-same characteristics of narcissism and privilege that define the former President (and obviously your Supreme Leader). I don't wish you good luck, nor do I urge you to do better--I don't think it is within your character. My only hope is that a changing electorate may lead to term limits, an enforceable code of ethics, and an increase in the number of justices that will place you in a minority.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
They are not supposed to be moved by anything other than the law and how it is impacted by the Constitution.
marble falls
Feb 29
#1
The lowest scum on the planet has to reach up to touch down, and they stand taller than these 6.
Ford_Prefect
Feb 29
#5
I'm a little perplexed by the reaction here. None of the liberal justices dissented
tritsofme
Feb 29
#7
I can't think of anyone less likely to be troubled by angry public opinion than John Roberts.
sop
Feb 29
#32
I hope replying makes you feel good, because it won't influence the decision in any way.
brooklynite
Feb 29
#40
Let the Supreme Court know online how you feel about their delay of Trump's immunity case
LetMyPeopleVote
Mar 1
#54