General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NYT covering Hillary Clinton's "deplorables" remark vs NYT covering Donald Trump's "vermin" remark. [View all]ExWhoDoesntCare
(4,741 posts)Because it's true.
What part of reality are you failing to grasp?
This is the newspaper that has regurgitated every single traitor trash party lie about Democrats--for decades now. They were the biggest shite-stirrers about Whitewater, Filegate, Troopergate, Travelgate.
They were the biggest cheerleaders for the Iraq War--and were active collaborators in spewing up the nonsense about Iraq having chemical weapons via their shill Judith Miller.
Al Gore couldn't even breathe without them finding fault with him. Literally. Did you forget their rubbish scandal about his 'sighing?'
They were the ones who gave credence to the Swift Boat lies about Kerry, and jumped right in, both feet, to funnel all the lies about Obama being born in Kenya, his tan suit, and the mustard on his burgers.
And don't even get me started on Hillary. They trashed her and blasted every single lie about her across their front pages, every chance they could--Benghazi, the emails, the uranium nonsense. They were *THE PRIMARY SOURCE* repeating the known lie called 'Clinton Cash.'
Worse, the rest of the media almost always follows suit because the NYT almost always dictates the all-powerful 'narrative.'
And you think we have no basis for considering them traitors who are bootlickers to the 1% who want dominion over us all--when that's exactly what they are?
Pull the other one, mate, because unlike you, we've been paying attention to their non-stop attempt to tear down Democrats.
WAKE THE BLOODY FUCK UP.