|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
white_wolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 10:34 PM Original message |
Should Suprerme Court cases be broadcast on C-span? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 10:36 PM Response to Original message |
1. You can already get a transcript of each oral argument within hours, and an audio recording within a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
white_wolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 10:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. You can get audio? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 10:42 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Here's a link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 10:36 PM Response to Original message |
2. This was said by David Souter.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
live love laugh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
3. Yup that would be transparency at its best. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 10:40 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. We already have transcripts of SCOTUS hearings... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zambero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
7. Clarence Thomas should have his very own C-Span show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 10:47 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. You can hear him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
white_wolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 10:48 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Well, not always. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
8. I don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
11. Your professor is wrong. Cameras are allowed in some federal courts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
white_wolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 10:52 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Ahh, its possible I simply heard him wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC