Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chris Wallace To Newt Gingrich: If You Live In A Glass House Maybe You Shouldn’t Throw Stones?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 12:25 PM
Original message
Chris Wallace To Newt Gingrich: If You Live In A Glass House Maybe You Shouldn’t Throw Stones?
In addition to being frustrated with the White House, Chris Wallace interviewed likely Republican candidate for President Newt Gingrich and showed no mercy. Suggesting the excuse that Gingrich previously provided for his marital problems was “kinda lame,” Wallace asked, “you love your country and you’re working hard and so you strayed. That wouldn’t work with my wife?”

Gingrich recovers somewhat smoothly, saying that he hopes voters will realize he has matured and that instead they focus on who best could solve America’s problems. Yet Wallace persists, wondering how it could not have been hypocrisy for Gingrich to lead the charge for President Bill Clinton’s impeachment, when he himself was having an affair at the same time? With the interview growing more tense by the moment, Gingrich insists his actions were not hypocritical since Clinton perjured himself in federal court, and that no leader should be above the law.

Wallace, not yet satisfied with the answer, concludes by questioning Gingrich “man to man” about whether he ever stopped to think “I’m living in a really glass house, maybe I shouldn’t be throwing stones?” Yet Gingrich thinks, regardless of what material his house is made of, if he didn’t call for Clinton’s impeachment, then he should have resigned for not being able to do his job properly. Gingrich argues that he is not perfect, but that one doesn’t need to be perfect to be a good leader and that he is willing to take a “tough beating” from Wallace and others in order for the potential opportunity to be a leader again.

http://www.mediaite.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hopefully he wont lose his job over that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Gingrich just isn't Faux' Candidate
I am assuming that their pick is not Gingrich, and not Palin

Either Mittens or Huckafuck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustipatedinCA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. hmm...was Wallace stricken with adult onset journalism?
No...couldn't be. He must just be shilling for some other GOP hopeful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think the GOP elite crooked elders have looked at the landscape...
and indicated which are "free game" to take out. I think Newt is on that list. I think Palin has at least a few toes on the list. I think there may be a lack of consensus on Romney, since he appeals to the big $$ interests. But, Newt, I think, has a bullseye on him.

We shall see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I don't seem to be hearing much about palin lately
actually since the attempted assassination of Representative Giffords and the six other murders that day. She's so yesterday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. I guess Fox News has decided they don't want him as the nominee
That must have been on the daily talking points e-mail that circulates around the newsroom every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. "That wouldn’t work with my wife"
Gingrich replied, "C'mon Chris! Get with the program! You are a Republican now and that means you can tell your wives and the general public all sorts of crazy shit for why you are such a hypocritical asswipe and scumbag. Look, next time you are banging someone that isn't your wife and you get caught, tell your wife you simply lost your balance and your penis ended up in some woman's vagina. See, there is really not much to it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. "Gingrich argues [...] that one doesn’t need to be perfect to be a good leader"...
...er, Newt? Does that apply only to you, or might it be applied to others as well? Like, oh say, Bill Clinton?

Geez what an ass Newt is!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. Newt Gingrich is caricature of the sociopath who seeks power.
And his supporters (the non-wealthy ones, I mean) are caricatures of the authoritarian follower; sheep that are so willing to line up and be shorn by their leader, over and over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. As others have said, Gingrich is not on TPTB's short list
If Chris Wallace is punking him, that much is clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. "realize he has matured"?
Newt was Born in 1943. His infidelities have taken place in his 40's and 50's (and perhaps his 60's, since we can't simply assume he's not cheating on the current future-ex-Mrs. Gingrich).

If you haven't "matured" by then, you're not going to. The only thing restraining him now is a shorter leash -- both the current wife and opponents know his M.O., and are more willing to make take any repeats against him, publicly, than past wives and opponents were.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. maybe by "has matured" he means "is impotent"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zazen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. +1,000! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. and the implant failed
I share your thought though. In fact it was the firstest thing that came to mind after reading his words. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. And the fact that he is even more repugnant than he was ten years ago.
I mean, REALLY! Even a blow up dolly would :puke: !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. It worked for Henry Hyde
When he fathered a child with a woman who was not his wife, Henry Hyde declared the episode to be a "youthful indiscretion" and the popular media oblingingly forgot all about it. The indisputable fact that Hyde was 41 years of age at the time of his "youthful indiscretion" seems to be the new standard for Republican hypocrisy. So why shouldn't Newt similarly be regarded as a late bloomer, ethics-wise?

One does have to wonder if the present Mrs. Gingrich doesn't keep a close eye on her man's whereabouts. After all, she knows from firsthand experience that he has a proclivity for boinking women when he's married to another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. Well if one does not have to be perfect to be a leader, that applies to Clinton too
How many times did they claim bad moral character made Clinton a bad leader?

Hypocrisy=Republicanism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
17. Newt Gingrich can't even be faithful to his own talking points.
Edited on Mon Mar-28-11 03:07 PM by Dappleganger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. Not a mote of shame.
Or class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. hey wallace, you are dealing with the hypocrite of the century
a fucking asshole hypocrite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. Gingrich is toast
This GOP Presidential primary will be popcorn worthy :-).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
22. Newt has Undistinguished himself with his Vanity and MEism
He is no "Leader" than the rest of the weak GOPer Presidential Bench....

Even Bachmann got better numbers...and respect....

Newt.....go golfing....lose some Balls...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC