Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What does "HIYBBPRQAG" stand for?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 02:25 AM
Original message
What does "HIYBBPRQAG" stand for?
Google used this supposed gobbledegook to catch Bing, the MS search engine, copying their search results. However, knowing the depth of computer programmers, I'll never believe it's a random string of letters.

It took me a while to figure out what "WYSIWYG", and much less time decoding a local band that went by the name "DILLIGAF", but all I can realize from this Google message is that the last three letters probably stands for "Queries At Google".

Any one else have an idea or heard the official explanation?

(Spell check took a while on this post.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
1.  from google via CBS
February 2, 2011 11:30 AM
"Hiybbprqag?" How Google Tripped Up Microsoft
Posted by Charles Cooper Leave Comment
http://www.cbsnews.com/8300-501465_162-501465.html?keyword=hiybbprqag
Hiybbprqag?

It's not the sort of word that easily trips off the tongue. In fact, it's not a word at all - but to Google, it was key to a sting operation it carried out to back up its claim that Microsoft had been surreptitiously copying search results. Google said its initial suspicions were raised last summer when its engineers reviewed search returns for a misspelling of a surgical procedure on eyelids called tarsorrhaphy. Google's Amit Singhal, who has apparently been charged with leading the public relations prosecution of Microsoft, has a piece up this morning where he recounts the blow-by-blow:

He said that Google returned the correct spelling--tarsorrhaphy-- along results for the corrected query. "At that time, Bing had no results for the misspelling," he wrote. But by the late summer, Singhal maintains that Bing "started returning our first result to their users without offering the spell correction. This was very strange. How could they return our first result to their users without the correct spelling? Had they known the correct spelling, they could have returned several more relevant results for the corrected query." Google claims to have found other instances of URLs from its search results that also found their way into Microsoft's Bing - including "search results that we would consider mistakes of our algorithms started showing up on Bing."

We couldn't shake the feeling that something was going on, and our suspicions became much stronger in late October 2010 when we noticed a significant increase in how often Google's top search result appeared at the top of Bing's ranking for a variety of queries. This statistical pattern was too striking to ignore. To test our hypothesis, we needed an experiment to determine whether Microsoft was really using Google's search results in Bing's ranking. That set in motion a sting operation where "hiybbprqag" and other nonsensical search queries that nobody would be expected to type in came into play.

To be clear, the synthetic query had no relationship with the inserted result we chose--the query didn't appear on the webpage, and there were no links to the webpage with that query phrase. In other words, there was absolutely no reason for any search engine to return that webpage for that synthetic query. You can think of the synthetic queries with inserted results as the search engine equivalent of marked bills in a bank.

We gave 20 of our engineers laptops with a fresh install of Microsoft Windows running Internet Explorer 8 with Bing Toolbar installed. As part of the install process, we opted in to the "Suggested Sites" feature of IE8, and we accepted the default options for the Bing Toolbar. We asked these engineers to enter the synthetic queries into the search box on the Google home page, and click on the results, i.e., the results we inserted. We were surprised that within a couple weeks of starting this experiment, our inserted results started appearing in Bing. Below is an example: a search for on Bing returned a page about seating at a theater in Los Angeles.

snip

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's past my bed time and acronyms are hard enough
To figger out when I am wide awake.

But this acronym looks like the Mother of all Acronyms (unless it is just programming code)

Will check out the discussion in the AM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Stands for Acronym Headache #12
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Here Is Your Bad Bing Proof Regarding Queries At Google
or

Here Is Yasmine Bleeth, But People Rarely Question Anyones Grandmother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I think you're at least close if not exactly correct.
Computer geeks seldom do things coincidentally, and easter eggs are a great part of the culture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-11 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's code for Microsoft's Republicon Family Amorals
of course
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC