Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breaking -- VICTORY! Court Says Plaintiffs Can Challenge Bush Wiretapping Law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 11:55 AM
Original message
Breaking -- VICTORY! Court Says Plaintiffs Can Challenge Bush Wiretapping Law
http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/victory-court-says-plaintiffs-can-challenge-bush-wiretapping-law

In a huge victory for privacy and the rule of law, a federal appeals court today reinstated our landmark lawsuit challenging the FISA Amendments Act (FAA), a statute that gives the executive branch virtually unchecked power to collect Americans' international e-mails and telephone calls.

The ACLU filed the lawsuit on behalf of a broad coalition of attorneys and human rights, labor, legal and media organizations whose work requires them to engage in sensitive and sometimes privileged telephone and e-mail communications with colleagues, clients, journalistic sources, witnesses, experts, foreign government officials and victims of human rights abuses located outside the United States.

A federal district court dismissed the case in August 2009, ruling that the plaintiffs did not have the right to challenge the new surveillance law because they could not prove that their own communications had been monitored under it.

But with the support of law professors, the NYC Bar Association, the Reporters' Committee for Freedom of the Press and many others, we appealed that decision to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

More at the link --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sanity has invaded our courts.
Who knows how high it could go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. To insanity? Remember some of the recent decisions? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drew Richards Donating Member (507 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Just so there is no confusion...

The FISA act of 1978 was and is an awesome piece of legislation.

Bush ammended it in 2008 with the FISA Amendment Act.

Unlike FISA which did not grant immunity to individuals who participated in electronic surveillance outside the statute;

the FISA Amendments Act, provides immunity for any electronic communication service provider that provides information, facilities, or assistance to the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence.

The FISA Amendments Act also expanded the range of persons being targeted by warrant-less electronic surveillance. The FISA Amendments Act permits the FISC to have jurisdiction over a United States person reasonably believed to be located outside the United States in order to acquire foreign intelligence information.

In emergency situations, the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence have up to seven days to get certification from the FISC after surveillance has begun. The FISA Amendment Act does not require the government to identify the facilities, telephone lines, email address, places, premises, or property at which the surveillance is directed.

If the FISC finds the certification does not meet the targeting procedures or is inconsistent with the Fourth Amendment, the FISC shall issue an order directing the government to correct the deficiencies within thirty days after the order was issued. However, if the FISC denies the government’s certification, the government may continue its surveillance activities during the appeal process.

According to BUsh Cheney and Yoo this means they can spy on all US citizens all the time...Hench the ATT global packet sniffer Program.

GO GET EM ACLU!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thank you. And this is why I believe any donations for political
Edited on Mon Mar-21-11 12:18 PM by sabrina 1
purposes should go to those who actually fight for our rights, not to politicians, with the exception of a very few. Politicians don't need our small donations, they are well funded by the people they really work for. But everything that has happened that helps the people has happened because lawyers have been fighting in the courts for our rights.

The Government, eg, has done nothing to help people facing foreclosure even though they know many of those foreclosures are illegal. But we have learned just how illegal from the many court cases filed by the few homeowners who were able to afford legal representation.

The ACLU works for the people and even though they do take on some controversial cases we may not agree with, they are fighting for our rights.

Congress gives them away so easily.

Thank YOU all the lawyers who have been fighting for this. I was waiting for the hearings we were promised in Congress AFTER we got a majority, but that has come and gone and nothing happened.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R'd. Hope for the rule of law not quite dead yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC