Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sea Water and Boric Acid- Can Anyone Well Versed In Nuclear Technology Explain The Boric Acid?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 09:41 AM
Original message
Sea Water and Boric Acid- Can Anyone Well Versed In Nuclear Technology Explain The Boric Acid?
Edited on Sat Mar-12-11 09:49 AM by KittyWampus
#
1320: Noriyuki Shikata, from Japanese PM's office tweets: "TEPCO's efforts to depressurize the container was successful. Additional measures are now taken tonight using sea water and boric acid. "

DU'er jannyk has a running thread on updates regarding the explosion in Japan. Closest reporting of actual facts I've found this morning.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x622475#622610

Edit to include molecule:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Boron has a high capture cross-section for neutrons
Edited on Sat Mar-12-11 09:45 AM by slackmaster
It acts as a shield for neutron radiation, slowing neutrons down. Boron metal is not soluble in water, but boric acid is, so adding it to the water in this desperation maneuver (which will work) will tend to prevent additional fission from occurring and will provide a small margin of safety for people working the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. people working the problem
Can you imagine? People sticking around knowing that they are very likely to be destroyed?

I'm a pretty brave guy, but I think I'd be getting away from that place as fast as I could.
But they are sticking with it and trying to keep it from getting worse. Real heroes, there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NutmegYankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. It may not be that dangerous.
The radiation levels in the control room (~7 mrem per hour) can be sustained by the body for several hours before you need to leave without much risk or health effects. Even in that situation, the operators can work behind lead or other shielding and knock those levels down substantially. This applies to Gamma radiation in particular. The other types, alpha and beta, can also be controlled by masks and suits to prevent contact with the body (inhalation of particles).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #18
27. I get a lump in my throat when I think of the Soviet men who did the initial cleanup at Chernobyl
They knew they were doomed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NutmegYankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Boric acid is a Neutron poison.
It absorbs neutrons, thereby slowing down the fission reaction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Neutron absorber. It means that they have no idea how damaged the core is....
Edited on Sat Mar-12-11 09:46 AM by Junkdrawer
so they're making a Hail Mary attempt to cool and shut down the reactor.

In Japanese Government talk: All is well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's "reactor poison"
Edited on Sat Mar-12-11 09:49 AM by FBaggins
IT further restrains the reaction by absorbing neutrons.

It means they've given up on saving the reactor (economically speaking) and have moved to their last cooling line of defense.

I have no doubt that investigations in the future will question why they waited so long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. Boric acid is a neutron absorber. No neutrons = no fissions.
It is injected into the core in an emergency as a backup to the control rods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Thanks to all who responded. I should have googled it first, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Agony Donating Member (865 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
6. Get some here ... Ceradyne
http://www.ceradyne.com/about/boron-products.aspx

The 10Boron isotope is a strong neutron absorber and is used for both nuclear waste containment and nuclear power plant neutron radiation control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
25. you can also buy some "20 Mule Team Borax"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. Regarding the use of seawater,
It is corrosive and if they are using it to cool the reactor, the reactor will be a total loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Interesting observation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. I think the reactor was a total loss as of 2 pm Eastern yesterday....
When all is said and done, the remnants of the reactor will be entombed in concrete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. I wouldn't go that far...
...but it's obviously academic at this point.

When all is said and done, the remnants of the reactor will be entombed in concrete.

Which could spark visions of chernobyl... or just about any deactivated reactor. Which image were you shooting for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Well, the Three Mile Island option of just waiting the decay times out...
and then investigating went away with the hydrogen explosion. And besides, entombed reactors tell no tales.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. We really don't know that at this point.
Reports vary, but if both major levels of containment are undamaged, a variant of that is possible.

and then investigating went away with the hydrogen explosion.

We don't even know that's the source of the explosion at this point, but either way it wouldn't be true. It isn't as if everything is decimated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. I doubt emtombing will be necessary if the containment building holds.
With fission halted the activity level inside the reactor will drop rapidly with time. It will be reduced by 90% within a year. They will wait a couple years, remove the fuel. Clean the plant. Reseal it and then wait 10-20 years for activity to drop further. finally the plant will be decomissioned like any other.


If you have active containment time is your friend. Just wait and monitor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Exactly. This reactor will never produce power again.
To those who don't understand remember the reactor has been halted. There is no fission, the only heat being produced now is by nuclear decay. Heat output drops 99% compared to an active reactor. Still that 1% is a lot of heat. The amount of thermal energy is finite and dropping. The seawater will safely pull away and in a couple days the reactor will be cold.

However going with this plan of action is a accepting this multi-billion dollar investment is finished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Yep. I think they've given up on saving the reactor.
These have always been steps that they could take to avoid the worst-case scenarios, but doing so would significantly damage the reactor. Fixing the problem as they had been attempting left them the possibility that the unit would be back in service sioon (after a lengthly investigation of course).

I think this cuts it. Of course rebuilding the outer shell of the building would have been an issue too, but this means the reactor is pretty much done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NutmegYankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. I think once the containment building was breached they knew it was done.
They have no choice but to shut the reactor down hard and permanently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. It's only your lying eyes that saw the containment breached....
it was actually a successful release of excess pressure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NutmegYankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. BBC reported that the explosion damaged the containment building.
Edited on Sat Mar-12-11 10:15 AM by NutmegYankee
But that the containment Vessel was still intact. I don't get your comment.


On edit: never mind - My "sarcasm' meter is FUBAR'd today. I'll go drink coffee now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #22
33. In the wake of the Japanese Government's "statements"....
I should be more careful. :hi:

It's getting hard to tell the difference between sarcasm and lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. there seems to be some confusion over terms here.
Edited on Sat Mar-12-11 10:21 AM by Hannah Bell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
28. I think it's safe to assume that the reactor is already a total loss
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whirlygigspin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. thank the Buddha for some GOOD news!
NHK is frustratingly uninformative to me at times, just sayin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
3waygeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
20. Not only will boric acid absorb neutrons...
but it'll also kill off the cockroaches that survive the radiation. FYI, boric acid is the active ingredient in Roach Prufe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. New Yorkers buy boxes of boric acid, sprinkle around baseboards, etc., and poof.
Edited on Sat Mar-12-11 10:40 AM by NYC_SKP
No caca roaches.

I hates caca roaches but even in my loisada (Houston and B) rat trap apartment there were none breeding in my apartment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #20
29. Was thinking the same thing.

I'm impressed by the notion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #20
31. We use here on Van Isle (BC) to kill Carpenter Ants
that like to chomp on our log cabin.

What an amazing substance it is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
30. cooling turbine just delivered to fukushima from toshiba factory.
just reported here from nihon terebi.

http://yokosonews.com/live

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
32. Boron is what they shielded cables with for the Manhattan Project.
My dad was a Boron chemist... he developed the shielding in Chicago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randomantic Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
34. Boric Acid and Sea Water
Edited on Sat Mar-12-11 02:04 PM by randomantic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
35. That's to kill the ants and cockroaches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC