Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No immediate danger at Japanese nuclear plants.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 10:34 PM
Original message
No immediate danger at Japanese nuclear plants.
http://media.theage.com.au/no-immediate-danger-nuclear-expert-2229008.html

A video so I will summarize:
1) all plants shut down safely
2) no structural damage to containment at any plant reported
3) backup generators to run pumps at 2 plants are offline
4) reactor still being cooled.
5) emergency generators enroute to 2 plants lacking power

I know boring compared to the end of world talk but just thought I would share.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Considering how wrong the human race is 90% of the time I'll go with 6)
Wait and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
70. I'm going to file this one away, along with "Thank God it passed!"
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. you forgot to mention exposed fuel rods
fucking bs liars
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. no fuel rods are exposed. None. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Link? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. According to this, the possibility exists, but it hasn't happened yet.
"The major fear is that fuel rods, which create heat through a nuclear reaction, could become exposed and release radioactivity."

from: http://www.theage.com.au/environment/japan-vents-radioactive-steam-from-plants-20110312-1brv1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradoxical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. Do you have a link claiming that they are exposed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
47. Yes they were - Core Damage Possible at Earthquake-Damaged Nuclear Plant (UPDATE 5)
Edited on Sat Mar-12-11 11:18 AM by jpak
http://nuclearstreet.com/nuclear_power_industry_news/b/nuclear_power_news/archive/2011/03/12/japanese-reactors-fine-after-7.2-magnitude-earthquake031101.aspx

UPDATED 2:00 AM EST -- Tokyo Electric Power Company officials reported that 1.7 meters of the 4.5 meter-long fuel rods at Fukushima Daiichi's Unit 1 may have been exposed to air as power problems in the coolant system cased water levels in the reactor to drop.

Media reports also indicated the utility has released irradiated steam from the reactor into the atmosphere to control pressure within the reactor and its containment vessel. The plant now faces the possibility of fuel damage as operators work to replace electrical systems and add coolant.

Early Saturday morning The Wall Street Journal quoted a Tepco spokesman as saying "if the water level remains at this level, the reactor core might be damaged, but we are now pouring water into the reactor to prevent it from happening."

Japanese officials also initiated atmospheric steam releases at the nearby Fukushima Daini plant.

<more>

and the fact the cesium and iodine were detected outside the reactor building clearly indicates cladding failure

yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. "May have been" is still not "Yes they were"...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #49
51. Cesium + iodine = cladding failure
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. 2nd LD Writethru: Radioactive cesium detected at Fukushima No. 1 nuke plant
http://www.istockanalyst.com/business/news/4964075/2nd-ld-writethru-radioactive-cesium-detected-at-fukushima-no-1-nuke-plant

TOKYO, Mar. 12, 2011 (Xinhua News Agency) -- The Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency said Saturday that radioactive cesium has been detected at Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant.

At a press conference, agency officials said that the detection indicates a reactor meltdown is occurring.

Workers were struggling to cool the facility and restart its quake-damaged diesel generators to avoid a total meltdown, officials said.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkstar3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
26. Link?...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
godai Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. I don't understand the wishful thinking end of the world talk.
Except that some seem to be wanting a meltdown to sink US nuclear power as an option. Why do we need predictions? We'll know for sure in a day or two and it's looking not so bad, as far as the reactors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. What kind of shit is this, when predicting a disaster is the same as
wishing it to happen?

Do you have any idea how fucked up that is?

Put it this way -

"If George Bush gets his way we will be invading Iraq before April!"

"I don't understand the wishful thinking we are going to war talk."

WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Scribe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. No, there's a distinct "here it comes!" excitement in some posts.
Not saying they want people to die, but they are jumping to conclusions and citing the human virus and other end-timey bullshit that I thought was just for Rapture fans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
28. Yup...
yesterday we were "teetering on the edge of disaster" before any, any details were known.

Even DU has it's disaster junkies.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
44. because this is a current emergency. not just some people talking politics.
Edited on Sat Mar-12-11 11:14 AM by Hannah Bell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkstar3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. So in other words, there was no way a Japanese nuclear reactor was going to fuck the Pacific Rim.
Thank you, now back to your regularly scheduled hysteria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Huh?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkstar3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. What do you mean, huh?
Have you been reading some of these catastrophic thoughts threads?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. I mean what is your post supposed to mean?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
12. Thanks for the great news. I, for one, appreciate it. K/R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
14. That is great news. I have to say I am impressed with the way Japan was able to react to everything
that happened today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
15. That is really funny.
Some asshole in DC saying there is no danger - obviously not, for HIM - and no radioactivity released, when immediately below him the screen says "Radioactive steam released from reactor".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
16. that's not what's being reported on the news.
They're saying it's a red alert and that pressure is building because they can't cool it and it's very close to a melt down.

Apparently all plants were not shut down safely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thunderstruck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. That's what I've heard on CNN in past little while, that pressure in one of the
reactors was twice it's design limit and building.

Sorry, don't recall who said it.

If what the OP posted is true, that's a very good thing and I'm putting a lot of mental kinetic energy behind those generators moving toward those plants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FedUpWithIt All Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
19. Look at the top of the feed.
Edited on Sat Mar-12-11 12:37 AM by FedUpWithIt All
http://english.kyodonews.jp/news/

I very much want this to pass into a safe resolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
21. kick and unrec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
23. Thanks, I love all the pearl clutching going on by both groups.
Gaia is pleased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
24. 300,000 evacuated now
hows that working for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. You can keep repeating that bullshit tweet, but it doesn't make it true.
According to the latest reports, the evacuation radius is only 10km, which affects 83,000 people at best.

http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/03/12/japan.nuclear/index.html?hpt=T1

It's merely a precautionary measure, but the situation is well under control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #30
36. sorry pronuker person. you dont know what your talking about
as is usual with your ilk.

Evacuation Zone Around Fukushima 1 and 2 Extended from 10km Radius to 20km
http://www.interpressnews.ge/en/world/26188-evacuation-zone-around-fukushima-1-and-2-extended-from-10km-radius-to-20km.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. Read my CNN link that I gave you.
Evacuations are only a standard precaution. It doesn't mean there is any real danger.

Radiation levels have been falling in recent hours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thunderstruck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #39
65. CNN is your source? 'Nuf said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. Which doesn't contradict anything in the OP...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thunderstruck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. Yea. No reason to fret about an entire reactor building
Edited on Sat Mar-12-11 10:54 AM by Thunderstruck
disappearing into dust. That's normal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. the entire reactor building didn't disappear, as you can see from the pictures, the
steel frame is still in place.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #37
40. if you find those images comforting, seek help.
because you need some badly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #40
67. sorry there was no massive death toll from an uncontrolled meltdown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thunderstruck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #33
46. Oh, well, I stand corrected. Funny thing about that blast wave in the video...
it looks pretty powerful yet it didn't blast apart the steel super-structure.

I guess to have any real damage to that steel super-structure the building would have had to have simply collapsed, well...kinda like the World Trade Center did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #46
50. Ahhhh, you're a truther...
that explains a lot.

sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thunderstruck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #50
53. No I'm not. And you're assuming I am explains a lot about you.
Edited on Sat Mar-12-11 12:03 PM by Thunderstruck
And calling other DUers names is against the rules. Also, commenting personally about a DUer, rather than the topic, is also against the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
25. K&R...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
27. cooling turbine just delivered to fukushima, just reported here.
http://yokosonews.com/live

march 13, sun 12:47 in japan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
29. Radiation leaks from Japan's quake-hit nuclear plant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. that is not current news. radiation levels have decreased & cooling turbine has
Edited on Sat Mar-12-11 11:00 AM by Hannah Bell
just been delivered.

live english-language monitoring of japanese media here:

http://yokosonews.com/live

power has resumed in tokyo; public transportation has been coming online since 17 hours ago. tokyo has resumed functioning. 5 people dead in tokyo due to collapse of ceiling of old building, dozen injured.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. Sat Mar 12, 2011 10:57am EST
Radiation leaks from Japan's quake-hit nuclear plant

By Chris Meyers and Kim Kyung-hoon
FUKUSHIMA, Japan | Sat Mar 12, 2011 10:57am EST

(Reuters) - Radiation leaked from Japan's earthquake-crippled nuclear plant on Saturday after a blast blew the roof off, and authorities prepared to distribute iodine to people in the vicinity to protect them from exposure.

The government insisted radiation levels were low because although the explosion severely damaged the main building of the plant, it had not affected the reactor core container.

Local media said three workers suffered radiation exposure at the plant in the wake of Friday's massive earthquake, which sent a 10-meter (33-foot) tsunami ripping through towns and cities across the northeast coast.

More: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/12/us-japan-quake-idUSTRE72A0SS20110312

It might not have happened 5 minutes ago, but it did happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. it's nearly a day old now. repeating it as though it's current just confuses
things.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. No it isn't
And it's not my fault if you get confused so easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #45
54. the explosion occured at about 3:40 japan time saturday. it's now
it;s now 1:27 sunday in japan.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thunderstruck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #54
57. That's not even 12 hours, much less a full day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #54
58. 10 hours ago, not a day. I know what time it happened because Japan is an hour ahead of where I live
And I was following the news as it happened.

The news about the radiation leak has obviously come out several hours after the explosion.

Which still doesn't mean it didn't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #54
59. Oh, and this OP was started 13 hours ago, and they got it totally wrong.
There was a massive explosion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #59
62. The pump system caused the explosion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thunderstruck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #62
64. Nobody said it was a "nuclear blast".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #62
66. "massive explosion" is what I said. And there are reports of radiation leaking out
Edited on Sat Mar-12-11 11:59 AM by Turborama
That was a very lame attempt to misrepresent what I said. I'll leave whether the two are linked or not as an open question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
32. I haven't seen any DUers saying 'its the end of the world'


could you give a link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
35. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
41. What you didn't confirm is whether radiation has been release, how much if any, and where
Because reading through raw feeds, it seems like radiation has most certainly been released (maybe not) and it's a question of how much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. there was a radiation release due to venting. this is the only release i've
seen confirmed.

going over it now here:

http://yokosonews.com/live
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
48. Everything is fine. Nothing to see here. Don't panic.
Clear the area please, run along now, people have a job to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
55. lol... wrong, AGAIN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
56. Just a little explosion. Nothing to see here.
Yes I'm certain the brilliant Japanese engineers are doing their best to minimize their dangers. I am listening to live feeds of news from various countries about what is happening.

And I hope they will be able to contain things at just the leakage that has occurred so far.

But it is too early to declare things all settled and all danger neatly contained.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
60.  The evacutation is just a holiday and the iodine distribtion just a dietary supplement.
Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thunderstruck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #60
61. But the radiation is decreasing after the explosion! It's all good...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #60
63. yeah, i dont know whats wrong with these people
nuke lobby is disgusting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
68. tower 3 cooling system fails
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
69. you really hit the nail on the head
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-11 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #69
71. I'm sure you must have meant the WRONG nail
Yep, they hit that one real hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-11 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
72. When the facts are against you, Lie Big....
Good Job. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-11 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #72
73. As I've been saying from day one here at the DU
the nuclear power industry can't be trusted to be honest about anything except maybe the day or the hour other than that nada
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
74. welcome back
Edited on Mon Mar-14-11 10:00 AM by meow mix
i thought your must have taken the gigantic brain over to help??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC