Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama "staging what labor leaders say is the largest federal union organizing effort in history."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:08 PM
Original message
Obama "staging what labor leaders say is the largest federal union organizing effort in history."
At a time when basic public employee union activities in state governments are under attack, Uncle Sam is staging what labor leaders say is the largest federal union organizing effort in history.

In contrast to Wisconsin and Ohio, where conservative politicians want to strip labor organizations of certain collective bargaining rights, 44,000 federal transportation security officers will be able to vote to choose a union, or no union, during a six-week period beginning Wednesday.

"It certainly is a contrast, and I'm very proud of the Obama administration for standing up and granting collective bargaining rights to TSOs, especially in the face of this outrageous attack on public employees that's going on in Wisconsin and Ohio," said John Gage, president of the American Federation of Government Employees. He spoke by phone from the Minneapolis airport, where he met with potential union members. "I just wish the American public would sit in some of the discussions we're having with TSOs and hear their frustrations and how they feel unions will make their working life better and contribute to the security of the airports."

TSOs are fired up.

"We are sleeping and breathing the election," said Kimberly Kraynak-Lambert, president of an AFGE local at Pittsburgh International Airport. "People are excited about the fact that they are about to change history and have a real voice in the workplace."


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/03/07/AR2011030704600.html


Thank you, President Obama. I have yet to hear a labor leader say a bad word about you. Now I know why. They know whose side you're on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. and I truly, honestly, deeply wish
THEY WOULD SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
47. Really? His administration is at war with teachers
and I should shut up?

Really?

That is truly, honestly and deeply disappointing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. He did one small, safe thing.
It's trivial compared to his neutrality on the rising pro-worker movement that was born in Wisconsin.

Obama has GOT to accept the fact that no one who hates unions will ever vote Democratic again. It isn't possible to be anti-union and still have any progressive values.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #22
35. I will always remember Wisconsin as the beginning of the New Age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
34. PM me the video. I would be happy to hear what he has to say to
counter the information that members on his staff won't get involved in the State issues because it's too much drama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #34
63. LAT: "Obama, speaking out on Wisconsin labor standoff, says public employees should not lose rights"
Edited on Thu Mar-10-11 10:49 PM by ClarkUSA
Link to what he said at the National Governor's conference (video at whitehouse.gov):
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-obama-wisconsin-unions-20110228,0,5323610,print.story

Link to what he said on WI public radio (audio link below):
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=post&forum=433&topic_id=613321&mesg_id=613321


<< the information that members on his staff won't get involved in the State issues because it's too much drama >>

That old NYT story quote only related to message control prior to the SOTU, period. To conflate it into anything else than that is total garbage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerOstrich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #63
74. These need to be a thread of thier own!!
and yes k/r for this thread, too!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #74
79. Yes they do. If it's correct and relevant to the current issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
48. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoveIsNow Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
56. These are public sector unions.
They're outsource-proof, so it's pretty easy for them to organize. Obama did one small, safe thing. He and the congressional Democrats haven't done anything to help private sector workers organize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Get the truth out there.
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Codger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Yes
That is what is needed for sure... So far this is the first I have seen or heard other than the administration thought all this hullabaloo was a "distraction" if there are things happening like this we need to hear about it more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Note the crickets around DU? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
77. yes indeed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks.
K & R :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Rec'd. And just think; I've read he's doing NOTHING! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. Obama's record on union issues is far from perfect
but I still say it's better than Bill Clinton's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. I appreciate that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is great new. Today in Madison I spoke with dozens....
... of people about the Presiden't support for Unions and overall performance. Opinions ranged from "pretty disappointed" to "what the hell is wrong with him? I'm angry."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. This is great to hear!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. that's a good thing. well kept secret though nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. If only I didn't think the TSA was a bunch of perverted asshats.
Don't get me wrong, if Obama wants to unionize what I believe are part of the problem with this country, more power to 'em.

And in case people weren't quite sure how I feel about the TSA. FUCK THE TSA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
50. TSA is probably mostly people happy to have a paycheck
and not necessarily thrilled about the policies they have to enforce.

This isn't exactly the best time to make a voluntary career change just because one doesn't like the new rules at the current job.

Although I am sure that there are quite a few perverted asshats mixed in, there seem to be a few asshats at every job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. KKKKKKKKK & RRRRRRRR! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Denzil_DC Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. K & R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. If this comes true, I will be the first to admit I was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. Thanks.
:kick: and Rec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaeScott Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. K and R. And shared. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. LOL This should be fun. DU luvz to bash the shit out of TSA workers
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

What to do...what to do...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
21. Deleted dupe.
Edited on Thu Mar-10-11 09:33 PM by madfloridian
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hay rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Delete
Edited on Thu Mar-10-11 09:38 PM by hay rick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
23. Look what they can NOT bargain about as a union. Gave away the store.
I am not sure about this. If unions give up the rights to everything to have a union....what have they gained?

Can't bargain on wages or benefits, qualifications, testing or discipline standards. Did I read that right? What can they bargain about?

http://www.npr.org/2011/02/18/133875479/Airport-Screeners-Seek-Union-Representation

"NAYLOR: Pistole announced early this month that he will allow TSA screeners, or officers as they're formally known, to vote on joining a union and, if so, which union to join. Assuming the screeners choose a union, the TSA will then begin bargaining with them on a contract.

Pistole says anything involving security will be off the table. Screeners won't be able to bargain on wages or benefits, qualifications, testing or discipline standards.

Coleen Kelly is president of the NTEU, one of the two unions vying to represent the screeners; the other is the American Federation of Government Employees. Kelly says there are plenty of issues left on the table.

Ms. COLEEN KELLY (President, NTEU): Things about their transfers, if they want to move to another location, if they need to change their hours of work, things like that are things that today are unilaterally decided by management, and that goes even to the promotion system.

NAYLOR: Despite Pistole's assurances that he won't allow bargaining on any issue that might affect security, Republicans in Congress are opposed to letting screeners take part in collective bargaining at all."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. "Screeners won't be able to bargain on wages or benefits"
Isn't that kind of the point of a union? If that isn't there, doesn't it just become some kind of club? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hay rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Or discipline.
I'm a steward. At least half of what I do involves dealing with discipline. The discipline articles in our contract have been negotiated and re-negotiated over a period of decades. A union with no say in the rules covering discipline? Sorry, it doesn't pass the smell test...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #27
40. You're right, discipline is a biggie. Amazing that's not in there. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. From the OP article: "Other than postal workers, no federal employees negotiate over pay."
Edited on Thu Mar-10-11 09:53 PM by ClarkUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #29
41. Exactly.
But unfortunately, comprehension is lacking by some and has been replaced with such blind hatred that it has become a knee-jerk reaction.

For the record: http://www.opm.gov/oca/11tables/index.asp">http://www.opm.gov/oca/11tables/index.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #41
69. You're 100% right. Thanks for the U.S. Office of Personnel Management's 2011 Salary Tables.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #29
44. As we all know, it is standard for a union not to negotiate over pay or benefits.
These people should have that ability. I don't care who is responsible for it, but it's not right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #44
49. I think you need to edit your post... you've contradicted yourself.
I believe you have an extraneous "not" in your subject line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #24
37. Think of it as a Hollywood set--it looks like a Western town, but when viewed
Edited on Thu Mar-10-11 09:49 PM by gkhouston
from the side, you realize only the fronts of the buildings are there, propped up by 2x4s.

The President's support for the worker needs to be more than stage dressing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. Kind of the same thing as when BP had people cleaning the
beaches where Obama was suveying...then packed up and left after he left. Sincerity has to start in the heart and BP sold theirs for oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hay rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #37
68. That's sheriff Bart driving off into the sunset
in a limousine.

Hollywood indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #37
75. yes. sort of a lame thing to trot out in the middle of a revolution and
then say nothign about it. He's covering that part of his campaign with a little window dressing. Plugging the holes in the Obama/Biden 2012 wash tub
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Just had to go and find out more details didn't you!
Why run these good folks day in the sun? They found something good to cheer around and you went and found some dirty facts! :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Wow, they have no bargaining power. Scott Walker is that you? OMG!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. What do you expect from people that think the middle class makes
150k a year? Bubble meet trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Here's a detail for you: No federal employees negotiate over pay, other than postal workers.
Edited on Thu Mar-10-11 09:54 PM by ClarkUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #30
52. Actually, the workers at the FDIC do, too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. Proof?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #53
58. search for the word "negotiated".
This union has members in many Federal offices and has many achievements related to pay, but the one with the FDIC specifically mentions negotiations.

http://www.nteu.org/NTEU/default.aspx#history
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. Give me a complete quote. Where does it say FDIC employees can "negotiate over pay"?
Edited on Thu Mar-10-11 10:29 PM by ClarkUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #59
70. A more explicit statement, for the comprehension-challenged...
from http://www.fdic.gov/news/news/speeches/archives/2005/others/spsept2705.html

"Employee compensation and benefits at the FDIC are the subject of collective bargaining with the union that represents our bargaining-unit employees -- the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU). The FDIC first began negotiating pay with our employee union in the early 1990's."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #23
36. Here is more recent
Edited on Thu Mar-10-11 09:50 PM by ProSense
information

<...>

The existing program allows for favoritism and “is based on really low wages,” Kelley said. While a union can’t bargain over pay according to TSA rules, it can discuss the process for determining who gets awards, she said.

John Pistole, the security agency’s chief, said in his Feb. 4 decision allowing the election that workers also can’t bargain over security or disciplinary penalties, strike, or take job actions such as deliberate slowdowns.

They can bargain for a contract of at least three years on issues such as their uniforms, parking subsidies, transfers, shift trades, and methods for seeking assignments and leaves, Pistole said in the decision.

<...>


Still, how does any of this detract from the fact that a massive new union is being formed?

More via Daily Kos, the voting ends April 19ht

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #23
38. Wrong. No federal employees other than postal workers are able to negotiate over pay.
Edited on Thu Mar-10-11 09:52 PM by ClarkUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #38
72. Not true... see post #70. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #23
54. That's one hell of a fucking Union
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: It reminds me of insurance finance reform. Of course IMO if you have to pay 25 cents per pay check for dues I would think you were being robbed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #54
80. See Reply 67
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
31. this has nothing to do with Obama.
Edited on Thu Mar-10-11 09:47 PM by provis99
Nowhere does it say he even supports this initiative, which is being taken by the TSO workers.

on edit: Oh, it's by Joe Davidson, an Obama sycophant. What a surpise (not).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
32. K&R...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
39. Am I blind? I skimmed thru that entire article and didn't see one quote from Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. I think they mean that by extension of his administration.
that includes him too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #42
82. Even though he's trying to stop his administration from assisting labor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #39
81. That's because its just pro-Obama propaganda from the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indydem Donating Member (866 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
45. Here is the problem with this method.
In Indiana, state workers were granted the right to collectively bargain by Evan Bayh doing an executive order.

Mitch Daniels just issued another executive order and took them away.

By using this same method at the federal level, what will stop the next repuke from rescinding the right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
46. It took me less than a minute to find Trumka challenging Obama to do something
for workers.

Washington is "having the wrong conversation," AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said today in the capitol city. "We don't need to settle for stagnation and ever spiraling inequality."

While unemployment continues to hover close to 10 percent, Trumka says leaders in Washington should focus on making job-creating investments in infrastructure and education, rather than focusing on fiscal austerity.

"We live in an Alice in Wonderland political climate," Trumka said. "In this topsy-turvy world, the same leaders who fought so valiantly to cut taxes for the wealthy turn right around and lecture us about the imminent bankruptcy of Social Security. Only at the Mad Hatter's tea party does that make sense."

And while Trumka said it is largely Republicans who are "giving up on America" by rejecting government spending, he called out the president for coming down too softly on the industries that led to the financial crisis. Mr. Obama is "about as pro-business as any president," Trumka said.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20028907-503544.html

Shall we go look at what the teachers' unions are saying?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #46
51. That's old news. On Feb. 27, 2011:"AFL-CIO chief blesses Obama's handling of Wisconsin labor battle"
Edited on Thu Mar-10-11 10:26 PM by ClarkUSA
AFL-CIO chief blesses Obama's handling of Wisconsin labor battle
By Michael O'Brien - 02/27/11 11:19 AM ET

AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka gave his blessing Sunday to President Obama's handling of the labor standoff in Wisconsin.

Amid some criticism on the left that Obama could do more to boost unions in their demonstrations against Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, and his proposal to eliminate most collective bargaining rights for public workers, Trumka said the president was doing just fine.

"I think he's doing it the right way," Trumka said on NBC's "Meet the Press."


http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/146311-afl-cio-chief-blesses-obamas-handling-of-wisconsin-labor-battle

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. Your claim is false and obviously false. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. Wrong. I was speaking for myself & referring to the recent attacks on union rights in WI, etc.
Edited on Thu Mar-10-11 10:30 PM by ClarkUSA
I certainly wasn't referring to old news stories that have zero relevance to what the OP is all about, i.e.:

At a time when basic public employee union activities in state governments are under attack, Uncle Sam is staging what labor leaders say is the largest federal union organizing effort in history.

In contrast to Wisconsin and Ohio, where conservative politicians want to strip labor organizations of certain collective bargaining rights, 44,000 federal transportation security officers will be able to vote to choose a union, or no union, during a six-week period beginning Wednesday.

"It certainly is a contrast, and I'm very proud of the Obama administration for standing up and granting collective bargaining rights to TSOs, especially in the face of this outrageous attack on public employees that's going on in Wisconsin and Ohio," said John Gage, president of the American Federation of Government Employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
60. A Union with no teeth
much like insurance finance reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. Care to explain what facts support your rhetoric?
Edited on Thu Mar-10-11 10:34 PM by ClarkUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. What did you not understand?
this is a quote from post 23
"Screeners won't be able to bargain on wages or benefits, qualifications, testing or discipline standards." No teeth? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #62
64. Did you know that other than postal workers, no federal employees can negotiate over pay?
Edited on Thu Mar-10-11 10:48 PM by ClarkUSA
Here is why "TSOs are fired up":

The existing program allows for favoritism and “is based on really low wages,” Kelley said. While a union can’t bargain over pay according to TSA rules, it can discuss the process for determining who gets awards, she said.

John Pistole, the security agency’s chief, said in his Feb. 4 decision allowing the election that workers also can’t bargain over security or disciplinary penalties, strike, or take job actions such as deliberate slowdowns.

They can bargain for a contract of at least three years on issues such as their uniforms, parking subsidies, transfers, shift trades, and methods for seeking assignments and leaves, Pistole said in the decision.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=610295&mesg_id=610689
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. To me ,having been a member of the AFL-CIO
for five years, bargaining over security or disciplinary penalties are very important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. "TSOs are fired up" even if you are not. As a huge union, they will have rights they don't have now.
Edited on Thu Mar-10-11 11:03 PM by ClarkUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
65. Walker brought the unions that strayed back to the dem party. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RegieRocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
71. WTF you got to be kidding!
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. You take of what you have first. I'm sure this is going to help the folks in WI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-11 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
73. Well if the choice is Obama or a batshit crazy republican of course labor will side with
Obama but it's not like there is really another choice now is there? Republicans? HA. How does Obama's embrace of charter schools support unions? Oh yeah that's right - it doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
76. I Am Sure The Chamber Sponsored Bloggers Will Attack Any Pro-Democratic Posts
On a DU site. Must spread division and discord in the left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #76
83. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
78. Thank God
OBAMA IS PROTECTING THE POLICE STATE WORKERS.

Now all the gropers, jack-booted border thugs, and porn watching cretins

will be Unionized

YEEEEEE HAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC