|
We know we can't get parents to take responsibility for raising their own, so let's not hold our breath. The most effective approach that I have been a part of is allowing teachers at grade level, lets say grade nine, to collaborate to create interdisciplinary units, and an integrated grade level approach to "whole" curricula. Teacher collaboration helps in many ways. The student's get a sense that their teachers are working together to help them, it removes the sense of anonymity that allows some students to either "fall through the cracks" or simply goof off with impunity, it creates a family atmosphere where there is often no real family support. When the English teacher says "I hear you aren't doing so well in your history class" it has an effect. When the teacher is talking about labor issues, say, in Of Mice and Men, and the history teacher is talking about labor issues in government, one class re-enforces the material that they are receiving in the other. We have had great success with this approach; the down side is that you need a committed team that will work together (often for free, mainly after hours), and you need to have the classes programmed such that a small group of teachers (10 or so) share the same students (300 or so). That part of it is a nightmare for counselors who usually don't counsel at all, but just plug kids into classes. For several years a small team that I was on was responsible for holding up the AYP on a campus that was 10 times bigger than our "Small Learning Community." This approach is also seen as a threat to old-fashioned "spray and pray" types of teachers who are only comfortable lecturing to students who both don't understand what they are being told and have nothing else to adhere their new knowledge to.
Great question. Thanks for asking.
|