Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Isn't it time to simply retire the "conservative" label?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 08:22 AM
Original message
Isn't it time to simply retire the "conservative" label?
Let's face it - traditional conservatism is so 20th Century (yeah, I know, more like 12th Century). Virtually all major Rightwing politicians and winger-leaning movements now identify much more closely with libertarianism (read: "Teaism").
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. More like batshit insane-ism.
While Libertarians love to chug them some Reaganomics Kool-Aid, not many believe in the same social policies that the Batshit Insane party tries to force on everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markpkessinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes. I opt for "regressive" instead! ;) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. the time has long since past
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. My dad's been saying this for years.
He's insisting we replace 'conservative' with 'reactionary'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vogon_Glory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Your father is right on target.
Your father is right on target. What part of Social Security, Medicare, access to legal representation, clean air, clean water, healthy food, and a fighting chance to make better lives for oneself and one's children are these reactionaries actually "conserving"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. "Look for the Anti-Union Label". . (great cartoon)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vogon_Glory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. Reactionary
I prefer to resurrect the word "reactionary." I think it describes the Radical Right/TEAbagger/"conservative" movement far better than the word conservative.

What the politically-clueless and the politically-asleep members of the media and the potential electorate have failed to realize for the last two decades is that the Radical Right is a radical movement intending to tear down. They want to do away with the New Deal. They want to do away with Medicare. They want to do away with Social Security. They want to end protections for racial minorities. They want to institutionalize fundamentalist Protestant Christianity over other Protestant Christian denominations, the Orthodox Christian Churches, Judaism, and other religions. They want to do away with the idea of the minimum wage. They want to abolish environmental protection. They want to not only outlaw abortion, but to deny women access to birth control.

What in Sheol and Gehenna is so "conservative" about these radical reactionaries?

:argh:

:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Populist_Prole Donating Member (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Reactionary is the most apt term. By numbers alone the baggers should accept it.
I mean if you are a small bitter minority who doesn't think the majority ( everybody else ) in their party is ideologically pure enough; would it make more sense for the smaller group to split off and try to find more critical mass than to try to get everyone else to change? It's like they're trying to tighten the slack in their clothes lines by moving their house back instead of the pole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. The pendulum swung hard after the 60's, in the next 10-15 years conservitive will be a dirty word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. The "batshit crazy" label works for me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC