Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More lawyers using Facebook to select juries

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 05:35 AM
Original message
More lawyers using Facebook to select juries

http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2011/02/looking-to-get-out-of-jury-duty-be-a-social-media-dimwit.html

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703561604576150841297191886.html


Facebook is increasingly being used in courts to decide who is—and who isn’t—suitable to serve on a jury, the latest way in which the social-networking site is altering the U.S. court system.

Prosecution and defense lawyers are scouring the site for personal details about members of the jury pool that could signal which side they might sympathize with during a trial. They consider what potential jurors watch on television, their interests and hobbies, and how religious they are.

This is one of those developments that is generating significant talk from both sides of the argument. Lawyers love being able to turn over a rock on a perspective juror that reveals a potential bias that could hurt their client’s chances of victory. Not everyone connected to the law is happy about this development though.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dennis Donovan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, I can't say I disagree...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
era veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Everybody on the Facebook should write that
they believe in jury nullification. In KY, for jury duty, you get lectured by the judge on 'following' the law even if you don't agree with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. If a lawyer doesn't check, it could be malpractice
If you don't check, someone else surely will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC