Cindy Sheehan characterizes the anti-war movement as a "no balls" effort.

[Kaleva]

"But we turned away. We let it go. The protest moments passed. "And the war came." That's why all our no-balls protests will remain nothing more than a brief footnote in a long, still-churning saga of atrocity and slaughter, while January 25, the day the Egyptians first took to the streets - and stayed in the streets - will be honored for generations as a landmark of human liberation."

http://cindysheehanssoapbox.com/

Can't really blame her for her attitude as she's put most everything she had into the effort while the vast majority of the anti-war movement will do nothing that puts their comfortable lifestyle at risk.

Had just finished reading the thread about a solitary 71 year old man who was arrested for peacefully protesting at a speech given by SoS Clinton and wondered what Cindy has been up to lately.

[leftstreet]

1. "But what if, as antiwar protesters, we had instead stayed?"

What if, indeed

K&R
Thanks for posting this

[Kaleva]

2. Thought it interesting that Cindy used what some may consider to be sexist language.

The anti-war movement has no balls. Implying it's feminine in nature and not masculine or tough enough.