|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 01:30 PM Original message |
Pot Use May Mellow Out Men's Sexual Function |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
1. "Research on the topic is contradictory and few studies are high-quality" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Playinghardball (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
2. Bullshit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
3. Or it "may" stimulate it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 01:53 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. Why would the body have receptors to LIMIT sexual function? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
4. Really? I thought pot turned me into a swarthy rape machine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
5. Makes me Randy, baby! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FormerDittoHead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
6. How about FIRST making it legal, THEN we "wait for more results..." n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
7. My wife can only hope. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
8. Well then no problem: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaysunb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
9. I thought it was diabetes and high blood pressure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notesdev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
10. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
11. Alcohol has that effect on me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
12. Yeah and oral sex causes cancer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
14. Wait, does this mean "Reefer Madness" was slightly inaccurate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boswell (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
15. funny how many current and ex pot smokers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woofless (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
16. "Erectile dysfunction" is all in your head. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
17. So then the "family values" bunch should love this, legalize it! It would only help, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 04:28 PM Response to Reply #17 |
24. No, the family values bunch wants hetero-married couples to produce lots of children. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 04:34 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. But only if they are good "christians", other wise they should want everyone else to imbibe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
18. Is the OP at all embarrassed about posting this nonsense? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 02:27 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Why would the OP feel embarrassed about posting a link supported post about a peer-reviewed study?nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 02:50 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Did the OP read the article he posted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
21. 'coud be' 'may' sounds real scientific to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
22. The strong negative reaction to this post is interesting to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 04:28 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. What is the claim of the study that is peer-reviewed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 05:50 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. There is an indirect link to a study that found THC receptors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 05:52 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Well, that's pretty much what I thought. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Myrina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 04:43 PM Response to Reply #22 |
29. +10 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojeoux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
26. Lame excuse for a post. As if scientists actually "Studied" MJ in the 60's and 70's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojeoux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 04:43 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. This post makes me appreciate the "unreccomend" device. np |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Myrina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
27. I've got living proof of that ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superduperfarleft (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 05:53 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. Had to be the weed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-14-11 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
33. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 06:01 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC