I propose that 90% of the voting population shall lose 71% of its vote.

[originalpckelly]

So, in other words, the vote of a person in 90% of the population shall only be worth .29 of a person in the lucky 10%. And a person in the lucky 10% will get a vote that's equal to their original vote (1) and 71% of your vote. So their votes will be worth 1.71 of a normal vote. Sucks you be you, right?

What do you think about them apples?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_distribution#In_the_United_States

[MineralMan]

1. Your point? This poll is egregiously lame.

[Lucian]

2. Looks like the OP's point went way over your head.

[originalpckelly]

4. "Holy shit, was that a sonic boom? Those planes are sure flying low lately!"

"No, that was a poster not getting my point."

[originalpckelly]

3. The point, (redacted for politeness)...

is that you'd never allow a government to apportion your right to vote in an election the way we let them/business apportion the distribution of wealth in America.

[KittyWampus]

6. Voting is a right of citizenship. Taxation rates are determined by our representatives

whom we voted for.

This is one of the worst attempts at an analogy so far this year.

[xchrom]

5. recommend