Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Egyptian Irony: President Obama asked Congress to extend our own Emergency Law: the PATRIOT ACT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 09:34 AM
Original message
Egyptian Irony: President Obama asked Congress to extend our own Emergency Law: the PATRIOT ACT
Edited on Fri Feb-11-11 09:36 AM by Better Believe It
Egyptian Irony
by Davidson Loehr
February 11, 2011

While Mr. Biden was asking Egypt to repeal their Emergency Law two days ago, President Obama was asking Congress to extend our own Emergency Law: the USA PATRIOT Act. Some key parts were due to expire at the end of this month; Obama wanted them extended to December 2013. (The Republican-controlled House had proposed extending the Act to the end of this year.) The House rejected Obama’s extension by seven votes — most of the new Tea Partiers joined many of the Democrats to defeat it because of their concerns about the almost unimaginable threat such power represented to our civil liberties. Today (February 10th), the House voted to proceed, probably bringing it to a vote next week, when it is expected to pass.

The ironies would be funny if they weren’t so frightening. Capricious arrests, indefinite detention without due process, and the real possibility of torture and murder are now “legal,” to the extent that any government can legalize atrocities. The Emergency/PATRIOT Law/Act invites and guarantees political leaders spying on their own people, systematic revocation of civil liberties, and the tyranny of a government that rules its citizens rather than serving them. These are sketches of a de facto dictatorship in both Egypt and the United States. In Lily Tomlin’s famous line, “No matter how cynical you get, it is impossible to keep up!”

When citizens like those in Egypt, Tunisia and elsewhere feel free to act out against the duplicity and violence of their governments, it is often the kind of freedom that’s just another word for nothing left to lose. We recognize the spirit guiding those actions instantly: it’s the spirit that once inspired our own American Revolution 235 years ago. It’s the spirit of hope that must be turned into acts of moral defiance against abusive governments, or we may lose our rights, our power, and our humanity. Through the extension of our PATRIOT Act/Emergency Law, our President will retain the right to treat U.S. citizens in ways he so easily identified as tyrannical and inhumane if Egypt’s president does them. The painful irony of our leaders doing precisely what they forbid Egypt’s leaders to do can be reduced to a paralyzing cynicism, or it can be amplified into non-violent but unyielding action. As history has shown, however, only that latter route of defiant uprising can ever be looked back upon with any pride.

Read the full article at:

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/02/11-2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Egyptian people didn't let any laws stand in their way.
Day 18 and Mubarak is on the run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. We should begin building mass movements here that are independent of the old parties and politicians
Edited on Fri Feb-11-11 09:49 AM by Better Believe It
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. Those same T-baggers would have would have no problem extending any provision of the Patriot Act if
one of their own were President. But we have a "far-left-wing-loony-liberal" with a (D) by his name for president, so they can't have that.

Maybe we can use them to repeal the whole unconstitutional act. Ya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC