Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wikileaks Cable Details 9/11 Team B. 2nd Group of Hijackers Booked onto Flt. 77 Aircraft - Got Away

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 06:47 PM
Original message
Wikileaks Cable Details 9/11 Team B. 2nd Group of Hijackers Booked onto Flt. 77 Aircraft - Got Away
Here's the cable. FBI, CIA, DHS has apparently been sitting on this information for 9 years. These guys were scheduled to fly 9/10 from LA to DC on the same plane that was hijacked and crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11 by Flt. 77 hijackers al-Midhar and al-Hazmi. One has to ask: why did they abort their mission, and where are they? Did the USG ever find al-Mansoori and the others? Why has the USG sat on this information all this time?



S E C R E T DOHA 000060 SIPDIS DEPARTMENT FOR INR/TIPOFF AND CA/VO/L/C E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/09/2020 TAGS: PINR, ASEC, CVIS, KVPR, PGOV, PTER, QA, SIPRS SUBJECT: QATAR JANUARY 2010 VISAS VIPER MEETING AND SUBMISSION Classified By: DCM Mirembe Nantongo, reasons 1.4 (b),(d)

1. (U) VISAS VIPER (State Department Terrorism Alert)

SNIP

3. (SBU) THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS PROVIDED FOR WATCHLISTING PURPOSES AS THE DEPARTMENT AND THE NATIONAL COUNTERTERORISM CENTER (NCTC) DEEM APPROPRIATE. WE RECOMMEND THAT MOHAMED ALI MOHAMED AL DAHHAM AL MANSOORI (MOHAMED ALI MOHAMED AL MANSOORI) BE INCLUDED IN THE TSA SELECTEE SECURITY DIRECTIVE FOR RELEASE TO U.S. AND FOREIGN CARRIERS AS AN INDIVIDUAL WHO MAY POSE A THREAT TO CIVIL AVIATION IN THE U.S. AND ABROAD. A REVIEW OF CLASS INDICATED NO HITS FOR AL MANSOORI. POST WILL ENTER AL MANSOORI IN CLASS AFTER TRANSMITTING THIS CABLE.

4. (SBU) NAME: MOHAMED ALI MOHAMED AL DAHHAM AL MANSOORI ALIAS: MOHAMED ALI MOHAMED AL MANSOORI DOB: xxxxxxxxxxxx POB: UAE GENDER: M NATIONALITY: UAE LOCATION: UNK PPT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx A0122037 (UAE)

5. (S) MR. AL MANSOORI IS CURRENTLY UNDER INVESTIGATION BY THE FBI FOR HIS POSSIBLE INVOLVEMENT IN THE 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 ATTACKS. HE IS SUSPECTED OF AIDING PEOPLE WHO ENTERED THE U.S. BEFORE THE ATTACKS TO CONDUCT SURVEILLANCE OF POSSIBLE TARGETS AND PROVIDING OTHER SUPPORT TO THE HIJACKERS.

6. (S) THE THREE INDIVIDUALS BELOW ENTERED THE U.S. ON 15 AUGUST 2001 ABOARD BRITISH AIRWAYS (BA) FLIGHT #185 FROM LONDON, ENGLAND: NAME: MESHAL ALHAJRI ALIAS: MESHAL AL HAJRI, MESCAL ABDULLA AL HAJRI DOB: xxxxxxxxxxxx POB: QATAR GENDER: M NATIONALITY: QATAR LOCATION: UNK PPT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxxxxx (QATAR) NAME: FAHAD ABDULLA ALIAS: FAHAD MUBARAK R ABDULLA DOB: xxxxxxxxxxxx POB: QATAR GENDER: M NATIONALITY: QATAR LOCATION: UNK PPT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxxxxx (QATAR) NAME: ALI ALFEHAID ALIAS: ALI HAMAD S M AL FEHAID DOB: xxxxxxxxxxxx POB: QATAR GENDER: M NATIONALITY: QATAR LOCATION: UNK PPT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxxxxx (QATAR)

7. (S) THE MEN FIRST VISITED NEW YORK, NEW YORK AND WASHINGTON, D.C. THEY VISITED THE WORLD TRADE CENTER, THE STATUE OF LIBERTY, THE WHITE HOUSE, AND VARIOUS AREAS IN VIRGINA.

8. (S) THE MEN THEN FLEW TO LOS ANGELES, CA ON 24 AUGUST 2001 ABOARD AMERICAN AIRLINES (AA) FLIGHT #143. THEY CHECKED INTO ONE ROOM IN A HOTEL NEAR THE LOS ANGELES AIRPORT WITH A CHECKOUT DATE OF 10 SEPTEMBER 2001. THEY PAID FOR THE ROOM USING CASH AND, DURING THE LAST FEW DAYS OF THEIR STAY, REQUESTED THAT THEIR ROOM NOT BE CLEANED. HOTEL CLEANING STAFF GREW SUSPICIOUS OF THE MEN BECAUSE THEY NOTICED PILOT TYPE UNIFORMS, SEVERAL LAPTOPS, AND SEVERAL CARDBOARD BOXES ADDRESSED TO SYRIA, JERUSALEM, AFGHANISTAN, AND JORDAN IN THE ROOM ON PREVIOUS CLEANING VISITS. THE MEN HAD A SMASHED CELLULAR PHONE IN THE ROOM AND A CELLULAR PHONE ATTACHED BY WIRE TO A COMPUTER. THE ROOM ALSO CONTAINED PIN FEED COMPUTER PAPER PRINT OUTS WITH HEADERS LISTING PILOT NAMES, AIRLINES, FLIGHT NUMBERS, AND FLIGHT TIMES.

9. (S) ACCORDING TO AA RECORDS, THE MEN SCHEDULED RETURN FLIGHTS FOR 10 SEPTEMBER 2001 ABOARD AA FLIGHT #144 FROM LOS ANGELES, CA TO WASHINGTON, D.C., BUT FAILED TO BOARD. THE SAME PLANE USED FOR AA FLIGHT #144 ON 10 SEPTEMBER 2001 WAS USED FOR AA FLIGHT #77 ON 11 SEPTEMBER 2001. AA FLIGHT #77 WAS HIJACKED ON ROUTE THE NEXT DAY AND CRASHED IN TO THE PENTAGON.

10. (S) BA RECORDS INDICATE THAT THE MEN BOARDED BA FLIGHT #268 ON 10 SEPTEMBER 2001 FROM LOS ANGELES, CA TO LONDON, ENGLAND. THE MEN RETURNED TO QATAR ON BA FLIGHT #125 FROM LONDON, ENGLAND TO DOHA, QATAR ON 13 SEPTEMBER 2001.

12. (S) A SUBSEQUENT FBI INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THE MEN,S PLANE TICKETS WERE PAID FOR AND THEIR HOTEL RESERVATIONS IN LOS ANGELES, CA WERE MADE BY A CONVICTED TERRORIST. THE INVESTIGATION ALSO REVEALED THAT THE MEN SPENT A WEEK WITH MR. AL MANSOORI TRAVELING TO DIFFERENT DESTINATIONS IN CALIFORNIA.

13. (SBU) MR. AL MANSOORI,S VISA WAS REVOKED AFTER THIS INFORMATION CAME TO LIGHT, BUT HIS NAME WAS NOT WATCHLISTED IN THE CLASS SYSTEM. POST RECOMMENDS THAT MR. AL MANSOORI,S INFORMATION BE ENTERED INTO THE CLASS SYSTEM ON THE BASIS OF THE ONGOING FBI INVESTIGATION AND HIS POSSIBLE TIES TO TERRORISM.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wikileaks-files/september-11-wikileaks/8297069/DEMARCHE-IN-SUPPORT-OF-U.S.CANDIDACY-FOR-IMO.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Which ones reported back to Cheney?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. "Smirk. Sneer." - xVP Dickie 'Five-Military-Deferments' Cheney (R)
Edited on Tue Feb-01-11 07:01 PM by SpiralHawk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. Exactly ....
MIHOP --

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judesedit Donating Member (450 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
37. That was good. I liked that. Let's not forget Papa Bush and sons.
The truth will be told. I wonder how the truth-denyers justify building 7's collapse... I guess the wind from the other buildings blew it down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. no it wasn't the wind
Building 7 was hit by the large perimeter columns of the Twin Towers collapse.
It was 400 ft away but the towers were more than 1300 ft tall.
As the tower peeled open, it easily tilted over to reach building 7.

Anything else you need help on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. "peeled open"?!
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeeYiYi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #49
71. +1 ... lol
TYY :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #71
74. -1...LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. first it pancaked...
then it crushed down. And now it peeled! What's next? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #43
98. Help US with this, zappaman:BBC's Premature Announcement of WTC 7's Collapse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. All of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. k&r....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Electric Monk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Mods, please don't move this to the "conspiracy tinfoil" 9/11 dungeon
k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I doubt they will,
unless people stray from the topic and evidence in the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Who would unrec this thread? Weird.
It's just information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. But it is information that goes against a lot of lurking trolls desires.
Hence the unrecs. The fact that they covered it up for 9 years should make one wonder WHY. Guess just like OBL, they got away...and that is all, case closed (for 9 years).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
45. Who would unrec? Someone who made a mistake. That's probably who.
Don't worry so much about unrecs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #45
55. I Did That Once
I meant to recommend, and wasn't careful enough with the touchpad. Pointer moved, i hit the mouse button and i unrec'd.


Didn't mean to, but too late to take it back.

So, i think you may be onto something.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
61. Someone who wanted to whine about unreccing, maybe?
Why care? It's just someone's opinion, has nothing to do with anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
63. Someone who would like to make sure..
..that it does not take the place of something at the top they deem more important?

That could happen, without them thinking this was particularly uninteresting/wrong/disagreeable/irrelevant.

Or someone who is just tired of every thread starting off with people not coping with the fact that their story is not the center of the universe. And therefore adding to the unrecs out of spite. Perhaps.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
83. Cheney?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amyrose2712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. K & R!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
12. KnR! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
13. K&R. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
14. Wikileaks is treasonous! We don't have the right to know ANY of this!
So I've heard here. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
96. It's like Lewis Black said the other night:
"When an old Italian woman says her recipe is a secret, she can keep it a secret. But when an Australian guy who runs a Mexican restaurant with a dog for a mascot says it, I want to know what the secret is!!"

If it can apply to Taco Bell, it can apply to the US Government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #96
97. absolutely, thank you! nt
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
15. What is it with spies and Caps Lock?
Is everything they talk about really that important? If they want to keep stuff secret I would think they would be trained not to yell about it so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. It has to do with the transmission.
There is only upper case available on the cable machines.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
48. It's a remnant from the days when people used Telex.
Saves typing time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
16. That would make this "team" the most technologically adept, by far, wouldn't it?
"Smashed cellular phone"..."Cellular phone attached by wire to a computer"?

WTF?

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. Yes, it would appear they were using VOIP in '01 and had access to several US aviation databases
Edited on Wed Feb-02-11 08:46 AM by leveymg
Note also that the three held Qatari passports, which is different from the others, 15 of the 19 being Saudis. According to the UK Telegraph, Al-Mansoor was at the time a 19 year old from the UAE who lived at several addresses in the LA area. The others were Qataris in their mid-20's who flew in from London on August 15. The cable indicates a fifth man, "a convicted terrorist", purchased the tickets for AA Flight 144. Who is he, and if convicted, is he being held by the U.S.?

It's possible that this was a Command & Control advance team, and that they might step in to carry out the attack on the Pentagon if something had happened to prevent al-Midhar and al-Hazmi from carrying out their mission. That would indicate the Pentagon was the primary target, and that this was carried out by a group of real professionals.

It's also possible, of course, that they were an electronically "noisy" diversion, meant to draw attention away from the others. Also, why stay at the same airport hotel for so long, when this increased the chances they would be noticed?

The third possibility is that this was a fifth attack team, and they had some other target, but for some reason, aborted their part of the mission.

In any case, this shows a much higher level of sophistication in planning and (you're right) use of technology than we had previously been led to believe.

It's extremely disturbing that almost a decade later, the State Dept. finally got the go-ahead to blacklist al-Mansoor. Not clear whether TSA actually No-Fly listed him.

One thing is clear - the 9/11 Commission needs to be reopened with some new members and staff. This story is far from complete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnlightenedOne Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. Yea, weird, because they all lived in caves
or so we were told. Cavemen outsmarted our government and our military. We know they definitely outsmarted our pResident at the time, but then, so could a trained monkey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
go west young man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
39. Probably aiming at the Library Tower in LA but backed out instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
postulater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
17. So the hotel cleaning staff now rummages through your stuff?
Great. We got spies cleaning my hotel room.

Not even private there anymore. I thought the phone tapping was bad, and the computer surveillance. Now this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnlightenedOne Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. I think this just goes to prove
1st of all - that hotel maids are not stupid, and 2nd of all, what they were up to was obvious enough that red flags were even raised for hotel maids (as well as flight school owners, etc.) - but our government with all their satellites and an FBI agent living with some of the hijackers had NO CLUE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gravel Democrat Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
18. ^^


"...12. (S) A SUBSEQUENT FBI INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THE MEN,S PLANE TICKETS WERE PAID FOR AND THEIR HOTEL RESERVATIONS IN LOS ANGELES, CA WERE MADE BY A CONVICTED TERRORIST. THE INVESTIGATION ALSO REVEALED THAT THE MEN SPENT A WEEK WITH MR. AL MANSOORI TRAVELING TO DIFFERENT DESTINATIONS IN CALIFORNIA.

13. (SBU) MR. AL MANSOORI,S VISA WAS REVOKED AFTER THIS INFORMATION CAME TO LIGHT, BUT HIS NAME WAS NOT WATCHLISTED IN THE CLASS SYSTEM..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. The cable indicates a fifth man, "a convicted terrorist", purchased the tickets for AA Flight 144.
Edited on Wed Feb-02-11 09:13 AM by leveymg
Who is he, and is he in U.S. custody? A few possibilities: KSM? AZ? Ramzi bin al-Sheibh? Five detainees have been convicted at Guantanamo through military tribunals. On February 11, 2008, the United States Department of Defense charged Mohammed as well as Ramzi bin al-Shibh, Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi, Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali and Walid Bin Attash for the September 11, 2001 attacks under the military commission system, as established under the Military Commissions Act of 2006. All were convicted.

Or, possibly, the Imam who seemingly knew everyone, and was everywhere at once during every significant AQ attack on US soil? On January 17, 2011, fugitive al-Qaeda propagandist Anwar al-Awlaki received a ten-year sentence from a court in Yemen for his role in the murder of a French energy contractor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
19. if that cable is authentic, then holyyyy shit....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
21. Recommend!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
23. Expanded follow-on story now up at DailyKos:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
24. The old ball coach Spurrier was right when he asked, "How many got away?"
And I told folks. "Watch. Years from now people will only believe that two buildings fell that day in New York"

Had enough Twin Towers only propaganda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnlightenedOne Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
27. And so it begins
sooner or later this info was going to get out - which is what REALLY has some worried (most likely the ones who call Assange a terrorist). I suspect this is only the beginning. How many newspapers will this make? I'm guess zero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
decidedlyso Donating Member (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. At some point people have got to understand what happened that
day. Cheney needs to go before a firing squad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnlightenedOne Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. I don't think many really want to know
they are perfectly content with the lies the government tells them. Otherwise, they might actually have to care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
decidedlyso Donating Member (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. I fear what you say may be true. But part of the reason for this
is an abject weariness for everything. It is becoming not really worth it to get up in the morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnlightenedOne Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. I hear you
however, I convince myself and read things that further convince me that to everything there is a season, a purpose - and everything will eventually turn out great and we'll be fine and better than ever. But, in order to get there, it has to first start with the truth - the truth of all things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
decidedlyso Donating Member (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. I'm from Missouri.............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #30
52. Yes just like the Kennedy assassination. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #30
67. And so the PNAC got their "...new Pearl Harbor"

Further, the process of transformation,
even if it brings revolutionary change, is
likely to be a long one, absent some
catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a
new Pearl Harbor.



So, tell us Dick, what about the 14 Saudis that walked into airports?

Oh, and George, tell us all again about all the proof against Saddam?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
decidedlyso Donating Member (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #67
72. Right. The confrontation is coming. We must overcome or die
as they impoverish us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
31. KNR! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BetsysGhost Donating Member (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
33. Kicking for Truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
38. No "Plane" ever actually crashed into the Pentagon. All evidence of the "event" removed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. When did you become aware of this, bjbotts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #40
70. Smart cat you've got there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Clearly you've consumed too much flouride.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #41
57. I don't think you understand how that joke is supposed to work.
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #38
68. Have you ever seen a large amount of jet fuel ignited all at once? How about high explosives
going off?

The huge orange and black fireball rising above the Pentagon at the moment of impact should tell you something about what crashed there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #68
73. moment of impact by what?
haven't seen any pictures of anything hitting the pentagon so you're assuming it was a plane as you were told.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #73
76. The fireball was caused by a huge amount of petroleum product.
Anyone who knows what it looks like when Jet A burns quickly, and what it looks like when HE detonates would know what caused that fireball. It wasn't High Explosives. It was Jet A.

So we can deduce from the fireball alone that it wasn't High Explosives, but jet fuel. What kind of craft, manned or otherwise, carries enough jet fuel to produce such a large fireball?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #76
85. you do know that jet fuel is just kerosene...
right? If there was a plot to fake a jet hitting anything. Then staging a fireball would be needed. We can't deduce anything other than we've been lied to! You however can assume anything I guess. I'm still waiting for the picture of the jet that allegedly hit. Out of at least 80 videos then it would seem there should be one clear picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #85
90. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #90
92. Anyone can insult me like that Zap!
It's easy. It would also be easy to plant evidence to convince easily convinced subjects that a plane actually hit the pentagon. But if one did, where's the pics?
Where are the holes made by the engines that are allegedly found inside?
perhaps you'll circle them in this pic for me? Thanks in advance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #38
78. When did they sneak those burnt jet engines into the Pentagon?
Those crafty devils.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
go west young man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
42. Link to the Telegraph's front page with multiple stories
in regards to unexplained 9/11 5th team. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wind Dancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
44. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
46. More confirmation of LIHOP k&r n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #46
51. I don't see that in this cable
To me it looks like either they aborted a mission, or were providing support somehow

Why the government doesn't release this information is beyond me...and that alone does not *prove* LIHOP

It just proves there were more involved than we (the people) knew about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #46
59. Let's go to the hop, now baby. Let's go to the hop. Ahhhhh-ahhhhh, let's go to the hop.
LIHOP, at least.
MIHOP, possible.

Sockhop? Definitely!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hugo_from_TN Donating Member (895 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #46
94. I don't see how any of this is evidence of LIHOP or MIHOP
A 5th team that was support or didn't carry out their mission. How does that indicate LIHOP??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
47. ***k&r! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
50. My guess is the right hand didn't know what the left hand was doing
And they aborted

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
go west young man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. That still begs the question asked in post's 18 and 22 above.
Who was Al Mansoor? Why is he not caught? And once again...MR. AL MANSOORI,S VISA WAS REVOKED AFTER THIS INFORMATION CAME TO LIGHT, BUT HIS NAME WAS NOT WATCHLISTED IN THE CLASS SYSTEM..." Why? And why has the 9/11 Report ignored this? Why have we only found out now? Also these guys had pilot uniforms which implies a different approach than the other hijackers. Why? Lots of unanswered questions here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. I'll take a stab at it...
My guess on Al Mansoor is he was most likely an 'informant' who was actually a double agent. Just like the guy who blew up the CIA office in Iraq.

As for the 9/11 report - most likely Congress didn't know, or this information was classified and couldn't be used.

As for the pilot uniforms, my guess is their operation was different than the 9/11 attacks, and since the way cells work, nobody knows everyone in all the cells. One person knows someone from another cell, but not everyone. Vladimir Lenin was genius in setting it up. So my guess is on 9/10, someone sent them a message to abort.

Again, I could be all wrong, but this looks more like coverups for coverups' sake, which unfortunately, is how our Government operates. As a result, people make up the worst in their minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
56. I'm guessing that notions of Qataries might foil plans for an Afghanistan invasion.
.. and would lead to more questions that might lead to Saudi Arabia instead.

Either way, the Afghan oil pipeline would again be in trouble, which was the main point for having the Afghan war instead of a Saudi Arabian war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
58. Sheeet!! One Adam-12, One Adam-12. Car 54, where are you? Keystone Kops.
And they thought no one would find out about it!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
60. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkyDaddy7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
62. I REMEMBER THIS FROM 9/11/01!!!!!!!!!
The news coverage talked about 4-5 very angry middle eastern men either getting off a flight or the flight being cancelled...But I do remember something like this taking place...


Anyone else???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. Perhaps you are thinking of United 23
Edited on Wed Feb-02-11 06:13 PM by noise
United Airlines Flight 23, a Boeing 767 bound from JFK International Airport in New York to Los Angeles, cancels its takeoff and may thus avoid becoming the morning’s fifth hijacked plane. It was scheduled to depart at 8:30 a.m., but was late in pushing back from the gate and is still waiting in line to take off.

United 23 cancels takeoff


Discussion on DU: United 23
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
64. Got away? No, ALLOWED TO GET AWAY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #64
77. allowed indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #77
80. "allowed"=LIHOP, in the most conspiratorial sense and context...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #80
81. Shhh, we aren't allowed to speak the truth in such a direct way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #81
82. It's all about context though..
O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
66. How do you know they haven't caught them?
That gives little idea of anything that happened. Everyone already knows of the suggestion the hijackers did "rehearsal" flights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-11 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
69. kick! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
79. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
84. Nice "Unclassify" date of 2/9/2020.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #84
88. I saw that! After most of the major people in the Bush administration would have died!!!
Edited on Thu Feb-03-11 04:57 PM by Major Hogwash
Rumsfeld is 78 years old.
Cheney has one foot in the grave already.
Bush will drink himself to death by then.
Powell won't be around by then either.

The only one young enough to still be around in another 9 years is Condi Rice.
I don't see how she can live with herself.
I really don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #88
89. I don't see how any of them can live with themselves.
Cheney's heart literally isn't beating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
86. ^
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojeoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-11 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
87. Can't Rec gotta K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
91. kick! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
93. Thanks for starting this Mark, thanks to the unnamed that got it to WikiLeaks, thanks to DU etc. ^
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #93
95. I second that! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC