Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"An Implement Of Freedom---semiautomatic M1911 handgun the official Utah State Firearm"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 01:29 PM
Original message
"An Implement Of Freedom---semiautomatic M1911 handgun the official Utah State Firearm"
01.26.11 - 11:52 AM
An Implement Of Freedom

by Abby Zimet

Displaying an admirable sense of timing and priority, Utah lawmakers have endorsed a bill declaring the semiautomatic M1911 handgun the official Utah State Firearm, thus becoming the first state to adopt as their symbol, not just a gun, but the weapon of choice for many random mass killings. Only two Democratic legislators opposed the move to add a gun to a list of state symbols that include a state folk dance, cooking pot, tree and hymn.

"It's an implement of freedom that has defended America for 100 years... This firearm is Utah." - GOP Rep. Carl Wimmer, who sponsored the bill.

http://www.commondreams.org/further/2011/01/26-0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. "...the weapon of choice for many random mass killings"?!?!?
Edited on Wed Jan-26-11 01:42 PM by slackmaster
That's a crock of shit. 1911 pistols, and .45 caliber pistols in general, are rarely used in crimes. They're too bulky to be easily concealed, and too expensive for the taste of most criminals.

http://prisonpolicy.org/scans/bjs/guic.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yep
can one even be bought for less than $700 or so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. One of the largest, most expensive, lowest capacity, and high recoil handguns
Hits all the mass shooter "must have list".

Seriously though why must the gun grabbers be so completely uninformed. I mean not marginally uninformed but over the top absolutely nothing they say is factual.

"Heat seeking bullets"
"AWB banned machineguns"
"Plastic guns that can't be detected"
"Barrel Shroud is that thing that goes up"
"The heavy, low capacity, hard to conceal, and very expensive M1911 is the weapon of choice for mass killings"

I mean the list goes on and on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. because we don't fetishize guns so much that we can describe them
as if we dream about them day and night.

word to the wise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #29
38. That doesn't explain why the need to embelish, to the point of absurdity,
the description every time. I mean I know little about cars, thus I don't make attributions to cars off the top of my head, I simply state the facts when speaking of them. I am old enough to know that if I don't know about something I shouldn't open my mouth and stick my leg in it, especially when addressing others who do know what they are talking about. Further, could there be a connection between ignorance of the subject, and irrational fear of that which they are ignorant of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #29
39. We aren't talking about minor errors.
We are talking about the world is round vs world is flat errors.

When a politicians claims there are heat seeking bullets and they need to ban them that is inexcusable. Basic research is a requirement for effective legislative action. A single phone call to a qualified source (including ATF) could have prevented many of the blatant false claims made by gun grabbing politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Jeez
I am all for concealed carry and RKBA, but an official state firearm? Is this really necessary and prudent?

BTW, I want to see the stats on the 1911 being "the weapon of choice for many random mass killings". Which mass killings would that be I wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Since most 1911 are 7 or 8 + 1 magazine capacity, they are
pretty low on the mass killer list. They usually have 16 to 20 9mm mags.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. An impediment to freedom, indeed.
What loonies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMightyFavog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. The M1911 was the U.S. Military sidearm from 1911 to the early 80s
Perhaps that's their rationale.

When you think about it, damn near three-quarters of a century in service? Wow. That's longetivity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Whatever floats their fucking boat.
I have to wonder if some gun manufacturer(s) aren't conspiring with them so they could sell commemorative editions of the gun at 3 times the normal price. Coming soon an official Texas gun and an official Arizona gun and on and on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. New slogan too? -- "Scared people need guns" /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
41. That wouldn't make sense. I wouldn't say the scared people
need guns, but if they bothered to learn a little bit about guns and gun owners they wouldn't be quite so timid. Then, they could make an informed choice for themselves about whether or not to keep a firearm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. The weapon of choice for Pike Bishop & the Wild Bunch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. When has this type of gun "defended America"?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I think it was when we invaded Honduras in 1912...
The inspiration for the term "Banana Republic," the status of which is rapidly being assumed by the USA itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Ah yes, my great-grandmother told the tale....
of the thousands of Honduran hordes amassed at our southern border, ready to cross over, when we defended ourselves with semiautomatic M1911's and chased them all the way back to where they came from :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. It has been, and was developed for, carried by
US military officers from 1912 (iirc) through 1990?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. so what the heck does that have to do with Utah?
Utah definitely is the least American part of America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Read up on John Moses Browning, one of Utah's favorite sons
Information is your friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #19
37. Now see there
Edited on Wed Jan-26-11 04:23 PM by pipoman
I learned something. I wasn't aware. Maybe this makes a little more sense to me too...:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurks Often Donating Member (505 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. It has pretty much been in continuous service with either the
military and police since it was initially manufactured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gaedel Donating Member (802 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
30. Not police
Very few police forces used the M1911 or 1911A1. Police forces in the US traditionally carried .38 revolvers and later .357 magnum revolvers. They only switched to the auto pistols when the bad guys began to outgun them with 14 and 16 round autos. The police forces largely switched to 9mm Glocks or similar auto pistols.

Since the military switched over to the 9mm Beretta, the M1911 and M1911A1 have primarily been purchased by target shooters (in national match grade) or by collectors and enthusiasts. Unless they are loot from a robbery, I do not think you will find too many of the .45 autos in da hood.

I carried the M1911A1 through two tours in Nam and it was a reliable, durable weapon easy to clean and keep clean.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Besides Officer Malloy on Adam-12, I've seen a few real police officers carrying them
One was a woman that I met at a gun store. I said "That's a pretty hefty sidearm to carry all day."

She replied "It's my hammer."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gaedel Donating Member (802 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. For an auto pistol
Police prefer a double action auto over the single action 1911 and its clones.

They also want more than seven rounds in the magazine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurks Often Donating Member (505 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Not entirely correct
And this is in answer to post 30 as well

While many of the major, large police departments use to issue the revolver as their standard duty handgun, the 1911 has been used in law enforcement for decades, the Texas Rangers adopted the gun, SWAT teams around the country have used them and smaller local law enforcement agencies have used it. It wasn't until the 1980's and later did widespread use of the double action auto become common in law enforcement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virginia mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. When my grandfather carried one in World War II...
Edited on Wed Jan-26-11 02:13 PM by virginia mountainman
I now own his 1911...I will hand it down to my children someday, as it was handed down to me..

No matter WHAT any future law says...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. World War II
It's also been used in other conflicts in which US interests were not so directly threatened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. standard military officer sidearm for 60+years, including WW2, Korea etc
Whether you count that as defending America or not is up to you, since technically the nation as a nation has not been defended since the war of 1812.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. There were attacks on US soil during World War II, other tthan the bombing of Pearl Harbor
Edited on Wed Jan-26-11 02:25 PM by slackmaster
Read about the Aleutian Islands Campaign for starters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMightyFavog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. And World War I...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I'm not sure how I made it almost 53 years without knowing about that one, but I did
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMightyFavog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I only learned about it from watching History Detectives a few years back...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. My apologies - I was thinking of the mainland only. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. There were also Japanese attempts to bomb the western US, and shelling attacks from subs.
The Japanese launched hundreds of "fire balloons," hydrogen balloons carrying either anti-personnel or incendiary bombs, against the US mainland from subs. Most of them are still unaccounted for out there somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #27
40. IIRC, many of the balloons were launched from Japan itself, relying on the
upper level westerlies to get them across the Pacific. I didn't know they launched them from subs as well, but it makes sense...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Travelman Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. And, if you want to get technical about it,
the Philippines, since they were a US protectorate when the Japanese invaded during WWII.

I'll admit that's a bit of a stretch from Nazis invading Virginia or whatever, but we'd be pretty pissed today if someone invaded Puerto Rico, and the Philippines weren't much different then, status-wise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Nazis actually did invade the US, if you count espionage
Duquesne Spy Ring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Travelman Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. True.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
14. No! Stop! If you make disapproving faces at that news article, SARAH PALIN WILL BE PRESIDENT!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
17. I had to carry one once. But, it sure as hell wasn't to defend freedom.
I had to escort some poor sod to the brig who had righteously taken a swing at a gunny sergeant. He got a BCD and 18 months. When we got in the jeep I unloaded it in front of him in case he wanted to make a run for the fence. The driver even slowed down to about 5 MPH so he wouldn't get hurt and we both did a lot of looking the other way but the kid decided to face the Brig Goons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC