Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rapper T.I. - Being American means being gay in peace, and being against being gay in peace

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-11 05:28 PM
Original message
Rapper T.I. - Being American means being gay in peace, and being against being gay in peace
T.I. - Some Gays are 'Not American'

http://www.tmz.com/2011/11/27/t-i-gays-unamerican-vibe-magazine/



T.I. was discussing gay rights with Vibe magazine -- an issue he says he supports -- and then mentioned Tracy Morgan's controversial comments earlier this year:

"Man, I will say this, the funniest joke I ever heard Tracy say during a stand-up was, 'C'mon man, I think gay people are too sensitive. If you can take a d**k, you can take a joke.' That s**t was funny to me. And it’s kind of true."

Then T.I. unloaded ... talking about oversensitivity in the gay community, which he believes betrays the First Amendment which guarantees freedom of speech.

"They’re like,‘If you have an opinion against us, we’re gonna shut you down.’ ... That’s not American. If you’re gay you should have the right to be gay in peace, and if you’re against it you should have the right to be against it in peace."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CurtEastPoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-11 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, he's certainly a credible source for moral guidance...
Edited on Sun Nov-27-11 05:33 PM by CurtEastPoint
T.I., born Clifford Harris, was released from a halfway house in September following one year in custody for his arrest in September 2010 in Los Angeles on drug charges. He was sentenced to 11 months for violating terms of a previous supervised released after being convicted of federal firearms charges.

Harris remains under supervised release until Sept. 2012 and is required to participate in a drug/alcohol testing and treatment program.

Here he sounds like Newtie:

T.I. has been in a relationship with former Xscape member Tameka "Tiny" Cottle since 2001. The couple married on July 30, 2010 in Miami Beach, Florida. Together, they have two sons: Clifford "King" Joseph Harris III, born August 25, 2004, and Major Philant Harris, born May 16, 2008.

In addition, T.I. has two sons with ex-girlfriend Lashon Dixon: Domani Uriah, born in 2000, and Messiah Ya'Majesty, born in 2001. T.I. also has a daughter named Deyjah Imani, born in 2001, from another relationship.

Through his marriage to Cottle, T.I. has one stepdaughter, Zonnique Pullins, born in 1996 to Cottle and Zonnie Zebo Pullins
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-11 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Which of his actions do you feel are immoral? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-11 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. He can take his own dick up his ass.
Offend me - on the way to you big bank - and I'm gonna getin your face.

Just like he would if racism were the way to a big meal ticket.

Asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-11 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sensitivity comes from oppression. This is why there are no really bad slurs
against white, straight males. You can call white, straight males "honkey breeders," but there is no real sting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildNovember Donating Member (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-11 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. There certainly are slurs that sting straight white males. They're not phrased in terms
Edited on Sun Nov-27-11 06:13 PM by WildNovember
of their straightness or whiteness though, but in terms of their maleness & earning power.

You're aware that since the 70's white males (the lower 50%) are the only group for whom real earnings at the median actually dropped? By about $3000. Their employment rates also dropped.

The income of black males at the median increased since the 70s, but not significantly. White & black women's incomes at the median increased significantly, but never to the level (in real terms) that white men were making in the 70's. The result? More poor people, more broken families, more children raised in poverty, more single-parent families, and more disempowerment of the working class.

I'd just like you to consider how the focus on color & gender can feed this dynamic, giving cover to the ruling class to grind everyone down, & how, even though it seems like "someone" (in this case white & black women) is making "progress", in the big picture those people "as a class" are actually falling farther behind.

White men are not the enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-11 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. In this case the enemy is ignorance, as embodied by TI
a guy on parole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildNovember Donating Member (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-11 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. He's one guy. Who's been elevated to "stardom" by the same machine grinding all of us down.
Edited on Sun Nov-27-11 06:28 PM by WildNovember
The machine is very happy when people focus their scorn on people like him. People that the machine itself elevates, both for idolization and for scorn -- all products of false consciousness on everyone's part. Meanwhile, the people grinding everyone down keep themselves very well hidden.


Here are the income figures:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=2326077&mesg_id=2327305
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-11 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That machine is made of people and their actions and if he is
a man, he is accountable. This is not some mystic McLuan moment, this is about an ignorant bigot mouthing off for his own enrichment. No 'machine' makes him do it, he does it by his own free fucking will, and that is that. No excuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildNovember Donating Member (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-11 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Of course he does it "of his own free will". But that's entirely beside the point.
Edited on Sun Nov-27-11 07:10 PM by WildNovember
All this scolding of individuals -- which grows, year by year -- is trivial and accomplishes nothing. And that's the way the PTB like it. And of course, the machine has a role in producing what people consider their "free will," that is, their preferences and choices and consciousness in the system created by the machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-11 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Your first two sentences demonstrate your misunderstanding of my post.
Your second and third paragraphs are irrelevant to my post. They don't address it in the slightest.

Your fourth, one-sentence paragraph, is just a random claim.

I think your problem is you're adding a lot of extra meaning to my post. It is only supposed to say what I have written; everything else is the reader's fantasy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildNovember Donating Member (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-11 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. You said sensitivity comes from oppression, thus there are no really bad slurs about straight white
Edited on Sun Nov-27-11 07:16 PM by WildNovember
males.

The subtext is that straight white males are not oppressed. That subtext follows a formulation that the PTB had a large role in creating and promoting. It's convenient that people view things that way, as just a matter of "bad" individuals (oppressive whites, oppressive straights, oppressive males) like TI or whatever this current whipping boy is named.

At any rate, I see you are not interested in the statistics I provided showing that white males at or under the median have lost income since 1973; that black males have gained insiginficantly, and that black and white women have gained, but are still well below the real income that white men made in 1973.

A victory for capital, but not often discussed as such things are crowded out by the outrage over random remarks by black rappers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-11 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. OK. Which slurs against white, straight men are equilivent to slurs agaisnt black people, women, or
gay people?

The subtext is that straight white males are not oppressed. That subtext follows a formulation that the PTB had a large role in creating and promoting. It's convenient that people view things that way, as just a matter of "bad" individuals (oppressive whites, oppressive straights, oppressive males) like TI or whatever this current whipping boy is named.

At any rate, I see you are not interested in the statistics I provided showing that white males at or under the median have lost income since 1973; that black males have gained insiginficantly, and that black and white women have gained, but are still well below the real income that white men made in 1973.


White, straight males are not an oppressed group in the US. There may be individual white, straight men who are oppressed, but they are not oppressed as a group the way women, gays, and nonwhites are oppressed as a group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildNovember Donating Member (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. I think you'd better define what "oppression" means to you and who it is that's doing the oppressing
Edited on Mon Nov-28-11 01:19 AM by WildNovember
take white men & white women for a start & explain to me what you mean when you say that white women are oppressed in comparison to white men, and then I will answer your question. You have set the frame for the debate when you imply that women as a group are oppressed in a way that white men as a group are not, so I need to be clear on what *you* mean.

Are you saying that oppression equals "slurs" (by whom?) or is that just part of the oppression?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. Our society has strong, double standards that favor men over women.
Edited on Mon Nov-28-11 02:43 AM by ZombieHorde
If a man sleeps with two women, he is a stud, but if a woman sleeps with two men, she is a slut.

Women still earn less than men for equal work.

Women's role in history has been strongly downplayed, though this is starting to change.

Women are more likely than men to have their doctors brush off their medical complaints.

The dominate religion in the US claims men should be the head of women.

Women are generally spoken of on the subjects of their looks (Michele Obama is so beautiful/Bachmann looks insane) and their relationships, while men are generally spoken of by their deeds.

Women have to wear more clothes than men when out in public.

The US is a sexist society.

Are you saying that oppression equals "slurs" (by whom?) or is that just part of the oppression?

No. I am saying the oppression makes the slurs sting more. Calling a woman a "bitch" generally stings more than calling a man a "bastard" because the "bitch" slur has the context of the oppression; the double standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildNovember Donating Member (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. And the source of this oppression?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Wow; big question.
The ultimate source may have started before we evolved into humans.

Our culture's sexism came directly from our previous cultures from past generations. The teachings of Christ have some sexist points, and of course some people (Republicans) will latch on to those teachings.

Ignorance is another source. We are generally unaware of the sexism in our language and view points. I was unaware of some of the sexism in my own speech, until it was pointed out to me in some books I had read.

So I guess my answer is culture and ignorance are the sources of women's oppression in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildNovember Donating Member (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. So I hope you won't mind another big question: what do you mean by culture?
I'm asking because so far what I'm getting is you think the source of oppression against women is religion/our religious history and not being aware of oppression. Is religion what you mean by culture, or is there more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Culture is our collective behavior. Religion, schools, consumerism,
courtship rituals, memes, media, political process, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
octothorpe Donating Member (358 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. Call a fairly progressive white guy a racist and see if it stings him...
I bet it does... Obviously he has to NOT be a racist, but do it for some stupid reason and see how insulted he gets. I think that might be the closest thing you can throw at us. Thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. You might be right. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-11 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. "If you're againt 'it' "
He's "against" being gay.

Please explain how that is possible, as it is akin to being against an oak tree or a field of grass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-11 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. First Amendment 101 fail.
I can't believe we're discussing T.I.'s knowledge of First Amendment law but, here goes...

One of the primary goals of free speech is the establishment of a marketplace of ideas, free from government interference: good ideas flourish, bad ideas die.

Being pro-homophobia is a bad idea, so expect blowback if you promote it.

We saw it recently with the guy who said he was not going to hire anyone until Obama is gone. He is experiencing the full force of the marketplace of ideas. And there is nothing wrong with that - it's how it is supposed to work.

All speech is not equal; it just must be treated equal by the government so the rest of us are free to determine its value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
octothorpe Donating Member (358 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. Well put. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildNovember Donating Member (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. The free marketplace of ideas can produce orthodoxies just as intolerable as anything promoted
by government can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-11 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. "you should have the right to be against it in peace." And there's the rub: They dont do so in peace
Beatings, murder, trampling of the equal rights of gays are what such "peaceful" contrarians engage in and Tracy Morgan got in trouble not for making a joke but for saying he'd kill his own son if he found out he was gay... which brings us right back to the beginning of this sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-11 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. agreed, but even moreso the fallacy of his premise
How can anyone be "against" being gay. It's like being "against" red hair or blue eyes. These people need to start being called out on their actual words, because they are incoherent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. Exactly - Prop 8 was not done in peace n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
20. Does T.I. stand for Total Idiot by any chance? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
26. I'm going to rush out tomorrow and buy all his albums now.
NOT!!!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC