Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The U.S. Passed Mandatory Health Insurance In 1798 Under President And Founding Father, John Adams N

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Seedersandleechers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 06:32 PM
Original message
The U.S. Passed Mandatory Health Insurance In 1798 Under President And Founding Father, John Adams N
Edited on Tue Nov-15-11 06:32 PM by Seedersandleechers
Many people who oppose the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act”, also known as ‘Obamacare’, say the Founding Fathers wouldn’t have wanted the Government to make health insurance mandatory for private employees.

This is simply not true. In 1798, under 2nd President and Founding Father John Adams, the United States passed a law requiring mandatory health insurance for any private employees working on Maritime vessels. The bill was called “An Act for The Relief of Sick and Disabled Seamen”

It’s safe to assume that John Adams, who was the first Vice President of this country, the 2nd President of this Country, one of the Founding Fathers, and was a key negotiator in the peace treaty between the United States and Britain, had a pretty clear idea of what the Founding Fathers would have been alright with.


http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/11/11/the-u-s-passed-mandatory-health-insurance-in-1798-under-founding-father-john-adams/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Philosopher King Donating Member (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. But not as clear as the guy who wrote the Constitution, which unlike ideas, is the LAW.
Federalist # 57

I will add, as a fifth circumstance in the situation of the House of Representatives, restraining them from oppressive measures, that they can make no law which will not have its full operation on themselves and their friends, as well as on the great mass of the society. This has always been deemed one of the strongest bonds by which human policy can connect the rulers and the people together. It creates between them that communion of interests and sympathy of sentiments, of which few governments have furnished examples; but without which every government degenerates into tyranny. If it be asked, what is to restrain the House of Representatives from making legal discriminations in favor of themselves and a particular class of the society? I answer: the genius of the whole system; the nature of just and constitutional laws; and above all, the vigilant and manly spirit which actuates the people of America -- a spirit which nourishes freedom, and in return is nourished by it.

JAMES MADISON (February 1788)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Friggin' horse manure
just like Congress exempting themselves from insider trading laws and a host of others. This means nothing today.

Madison was a friggin' Nazi before there was such a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosopher King Donating Member (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. NAZI - Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (National Socialist German Workers' Party)
Edited on Tue Nov-15-11 06:52 PM by Philosopher King
Marxism spawned German socialism, but as you mentioned, that was a bit after Madison's time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. LOL!
enjoy your stay. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turn CO Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Bwahaha! Misinformed much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosopher King Donating Member (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 05:26 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. 'tis a pity...the line of the historically challenged grows ever longer.
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm not aware of anyone basing their objections to Obama's HCR on the founding fathers.
I believe your OP is whatKs referred to as a 'straw man'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-11 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. Deceptive headline, at best.
This was a law requiring the owners of the vessels to pay for workers' compensation insurance, effectively, for their employees.

It does not order individual employees/citizens to buy health insurance.

-Laelth

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC