Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Broke! 10 Facts About The Financial Condition Of American Families That Will Blow Your Mind

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 08:12 PM
Original message
Broke! 10 Facts About The Financial Condition Of American Families That Will Blow Your Mind
<skip>


#1 Only 58 percent of Americans have a job right now.

#2 Only 56 percent of Americans are currently covered by employer-provided health insurance.

#3 The median yearly wage in the United States is $26,261.

#4 The average American household is carrying $75,600 in debt.

#5 Only the top 5 percent of U.S. households have earned enough additional income to match the rise in housing costs since 1975.

#6 At this point, American families are approximately 7.7 trillion dollars poorer than they were back in early 2007.

#7 The poorest 50% of all Americans now own just 2.5% of all the wealth in the United States.

#8 According to one study, approximately 21 percent of all children in the United States were living below the poverty line in 2010.

#9 Today, there are more than 44 million Americans on food stamps, and nearly half of them are children.

#10 According to Newsweek, close to 20 percent of all American men between the ages of 25 and 54 do not have a job at the moment.

more . . . http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/broke-10-facts-about-the-financial-condition-of-american-families-that-will-blow-your-mind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. .
K&R. I am so sick of arguing with Rethugs about poverty, this economy, how far we've fallen as a nation (especially with my mother!)

Let the statistics speak!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. send this to obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. he knows...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #29
68. ...and he doesn't care.
Edited on Sun Nov-13-11 11:27 AM by bvar22
His Peeps (Top 1%) are doing GREAT.
So whats the problem?:shrug:


"We can't begrudge them their wealth."
I know these guys, and "they are just savvy businessmen."
"Its the Free market!!!"
"Look at all the Baseball players."






You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their excuses.
Solidarity99!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #68
71. ... except to the extent that it becomes a political problem. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #68
79. I even suspect that at secret meetings he stands in front of those
Edited on Sun Nov-13-11 01:30 PM by truedelphi
PEEPS with a "Mission Accomplished" banner streaming behind him.

The upper one percent want us to be poorer than shit. And when they hear that X amount of people are on Food Stamps, their only thought is, "Damn. When will we get to stop providing "welfare" to these pieces of garbage?"



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #68
88. Quick! Quick! WE need a list! And we need a "kick if you support" thread!
And we need a retaliatory post with lots of blue links!

Quick! Quick! Before the truth gets out of hand!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 01:34 PM
Original message
Send it over and over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R SHAME on Obama and the Super Theft Committee.
Edited on Sat Nov-12-11 08:24 PM by woo me with science
SHAME on Obama and the Super Theft Committee. What are they talking about doing?

1. Slashing safety nets and vital programs during the worst economy since the Great Depression
2. Protecting the military industrial complex
3. Make permanent TAX CUTS FOR THE WEALTHY

We need a million seniors in front of the White House and Congress to SHAME them into doing the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
87. I think the GOP might be involved too.
Remember how the tea party and "take back america" swept them into national and state offices? A lot of the problems we have now are the more or less unavoidable consequences of an election that went very bad.

A march on the white house and congress would be great to see...and even better would be for people to vote for good government again in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #87
90. "Too" is the operative word in that sentence.
Edited on Sun Nov-13-11 02:49 PM by woo me with science
Do not try to excuse this corporate Trojan horse of a President by pointing to the election. He is doing exactly what he wants to do. The entire damned record shows that he is doing exactly what he wants to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #90
93. So, again, its not his policies, not his speech, not his actions, but his secret intentions
which somehow you know.

I think the majority of Obama's time in office has been spent working on the problem of increasing economic growth, creating jobs, and getting america "back on its feet". The whole weigh of the GOP, on the other hand, has been trying to frustrate every democratic effort so that the president looks bad and loses the next election. They don't care who suffers for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #93
102. You "think" so, huh?
That is where the record of his actual behavior comes in handy. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
89. Same. ol'. corporate. horse....

...just a different color.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #89
91. Indeed.
He is from the faux Democratic wing of the Corporate Party. We have been purchased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. We are well on our way to becoming a third world country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
45. In many respects, the US already IS a third world country.
As one example, only four countries have NO national law mandating paid time off for new parents:

LIBERIA

PAPUA NEW GUINEA

SWAZILAND

and, believe it - it's true!

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

WE'RE NUMBER 189! WE'RE NUMBER 189!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parental_leave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #45
95. fathers get 2 weeks in france, mothers 16
but sweden is pushing the entire eu to adopt their one year off at 80% salary for each parent plan.... and yes they are sucessfully capitalist in sweden
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. And 50% of those unemployed, poor and in debt will vote for a repub in 2012
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
32. You have a link for that -- ?
GOP was finished in 2008 --

Obama resurrected them from the ashes --

No one is voting for the GOP --

And likely after what Obama and Third Way have done to the party

many Democrats will be staying home unless we get a challenger to Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #32
78. Both of my sisters lost their jobs within the last
Edited on Sun Nov-13-11 01:32 PM by xxqqqzme
6 months - one is 51, the other is 58. The older sister has worked for huge, successful non-profits for the last 30 years. She doesn't know she is 99%. The younger sister had to move in with our mom. She had been working in drug rehab but now can't afford to finish her counselor certification classes. They both will blindly vote rethuglican in 2012.

Their ages alone make it highly unlikely they will find, anything other than barely above minimum wage jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #78
105. Well ...
my son was unemployed for a year and a half -- and I've certainly witnessed

many lay offs for younger workers -- younger than your sisters.

Some graduates have been unemployed for a year or more waiting for a first job!

No summer jobs for kids either --

Amazing that one sister worked for "non-profits" and doesn't get it -

what RW non-profits? :sarcasm:

I can see that "drug rehab" might be kinda RW with belief in the Drug War, etal --

but it's like the cancer care industry now -- a world unto itself dependent upon

the keeping the Drug War and Cancer going and expanding!! YIKES!


I can say my son has stopped voting since Howard Dean -- !!

And my efforts to get him to vote aren't working.


However, he certainly wouldn't be voting for any RW'er if he was voting --

and certainly wouldn't be voting for Obama or any Wall Street Dem which makes it

rather difficult to vote, actually -- !! :evilgrin:


Still -- think most people recognize why they are out of work -- they may not know

all the details of the coup, but capitalism has gotten their attention and not in a

good way! They know our economic system is gimmicked and that the GOP didn't do this

alone!

And certainly I don't see any of the immense -- massive crowds of OWS/99% -- voting

for anyone on the right. Or any of the OWS supporters voting for anyone on the right.

Again -- the GOP was finished in 2008 and Obama had a mandate which he threw away

in favor of resurrecting the GOP from the ashes.


And here we are!!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
74. Not if I have anything to say about it, they won't - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. There's a reason they took all that equity away from The People.
But even on DU - we will blame the victim.

The vast majority
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErikJ Donating Member (480 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Dont blame the Banks-Blame yourself!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I hope that's sarcasm. You still have time to edit... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErikJ Donating Member (480 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Herman Cain's Quote
a few weeks ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
31. Rudy Guiliani's comment on OWS was 'GET A JOB -- !!!' ---
Olberman showed a clip of it one night last week --

Takes a lot of money, evidently, to be that callous and brutal -- !!



:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Po_d Mainiac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
53. ayuh
I used white-out and 'copy paste' to fudge income on 3rd mortgage applications
I was taking out on spec houses
whom my 'bought off appraisor's' jacked the value of
that I then securitized
but never bothered to record the liens
or transfered into the securities as required by statute
but still were blessed with AAA+ ratings
which I then bundled off into MBS's and CDO's
which I peddled to investors and trust funds that thought they were buying
'money good' paper on first mortgages to qualified applicants whom were buying primary first residenses
Then I 'synthesized that same paper and got AIG and Freddie to guarantee it really wasn't used toilet paper
and I made tons of money
esp after getting all that money from the FED and Treasury when they bailed out AIG and the GSE's

oops, did I really do that?

Fuck you Mr Cain--U Un-Able prick
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
64. Blame yourself, sure sounds like a right wing talking point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Shameful n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. While I agree with most of this blog posting, I vehemently disagree with this part
" Speaking as a small employer, I would rather have a root canal than another employee. Let’s see. You first have to hire someone you trust without some labor lawyer suing you for some type of discrimination. Then you have OSHA to make sure your work place is safe. Then you have workmans compensation insurance, unemployment taxes, health insurance, liability insurance, now Obamacare. Oh be careful not to be deemed to have a “hostile work environment”. Then you have to negotiate the labor laws. The Department of Labor is constantly cranking out regulation.

Then you get the pleasure of paying payroll taxes both state and federal along with the required filing of a multitude of payroll forms. Miss filing or paying these taxes and you will be crushed with interest and penalties.

Of course, you are competing with businesses that can hire at a fraction of the cost of American Labor and with very little regulations. In this economy, no one in their right mind is hiring into this unstable and declining economy.

If business turns down all you have to worry about is laying off workers. Of course your unemployment insurance tax will go up 200% for years. Then you only have to then worry about a wrongful termination law suit."



I am a small biz owner. I don't find the taxes, regulations, or any other aspect of hiring of new employees to be cumbersome or constraining on me. The agenda of the person who sent in that contribution is to be questioned as it sounds a bit too "Ron Paul" for me.

Just a small quibble with an otherwise excellent summation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. A couple of things...
As an employer, you do not pay withholding tax, you collect them from the employee and then pass them on to the taxing agency. The reason they come down hard on you if you miss is because it isn't your money. It is the money taken from wages and salary that you are holding for the taxing agency.

You only pay unemployment tax on the first 8k, after that, no more liability.

Workers comp is in fact, cheap liability protection for the safety of the workers.

I am using the you pronoun as an answer to the employer you are channeling to us.

I have been an accountant for over 20 years now and have dealt with dozens of small businesses over the years.

I have yet to see one of them be taken to court for problems with employees.

It is a myth that that happens "all the time".

It's just crazy what these people believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 03:40 AM
Response to Reply #24
42. "It's just crazy what these people believe."
The misinformation machine runs 24/7.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Nikon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 04:03 AM
Response to Reply #24
43. Employers who are afraid of discrimination complaints generally have good cause
...because they are the ones discriminating. Don't discriminate against your employees and don't allow hostile work environments and you don't have anything to fear from EEOC complaints or lawsuits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #24
61. employers pay SSI and Medicare, in addition to UI
Edited on Sun Nov-13-11 10:37 AM by noiretextatique
they pay the same 7.65% rate as employees. it is not a withholding tax, but it is a payroll tax. in tough times, employers try to evade paying that tax and hire contractors...i see this a lot on craigslist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #61
66. This is how many residential contractors bypass the law
and "make" large sums of money. They hire an employee by the hour, make them provide their own hand tools, do not provide any benefits including UI because they claim these employees as "independent contractors" and they are sent a 1099 form at the end of each year. The residential construction industry depends on this illegal "business model" so that the contractors can make big bucks while the workers are left totally unprotected. I was one of these "independent contractors" for years. I didn't even realize it at first, until the IRS informed me while they were demanding huge payments, interests and penalties. Of course the contractor lived large.

Thank God for Unions. After years of anti-union propaganda spread by the greedy, I finally learned the truth. It changed my life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. The overall point makes sense though. Businesses don't want to hire--
--unless they really need to in order to meet increased demand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Agreed! I just had to post my own small quibble with that part. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #9
33. Your problem is capitalism and corrupt government, not LABOR ... !!!
Capitalism isn't about competitition -- it's about killing the competitition.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #9
36. I was going to start a whites-only chainsaw juggling business
But those government regulations are just too burdensome.

(Do I really need to add a sarcasm tag?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
39. Thank you, well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 03:36 AM
Response to Reply #9
41. Thanks for your contribution. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mackdaddy Donating Member (177 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #9
56. "Another employee" no, -- the First employee, YES..

All of the issues listed are true and just part of running ANY business. There are also a lot more regulations and record keeping and taxes you have to collect like sales taxes for hundreds of different tax districts in just Ohio and forms like the W9 just to sell products or services now. But this is the same as it has been for any of our lifetimes!

Where the above statement is true is for going from a sole proprietor to having ANY employees. Pretty much any small business that has even one employee other than the owner will need another employee to just keep up with all of the books (or outsourced bookkeeper). That is a major reason I have not grown my business to that next step. The smallest business with employees is almost always 3 or 4 people.

But once you have the system in place to keep track whether you have 3 employees or 25 is not much different from the standpoint of these requirements.

Finally most of what was being complained about in the quoted statement I agree is bogus. Yes it is a risk you could run into a gold digger trying to scam you with false accusations, but you can run into this just walking out your front door. Most of the labor laws are just making sure you treat your employees FAIRLY! Don't try to screw people over and it is not an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. I keep seeing "average" figures. What do the figures look like
Edited on Sat Nov-12-11 08:53 PM by Downwinder
if you take the 1% out of the equation?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Exactly.
It's the whole, if three individuals are in an elevator, two are unemployed and one is a Wall Street banker, the average median income in this group is wholly skewed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caraher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #13
46. No, average and median mean different things
Yes, the *average* is skewed upward by the presence of the banker, because for the average you add the numbers and divide by 3.

But no, the *median* is not skewed by the presence of the banker, because for the median you list the incomes in descending order and report the one in the middle.

So look for median figures if you want a better picture of how the typical person fares - that figure is immune to the distortions of the top 1%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mendocino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #13
47. Bill Gates and I were
Edited on Sun Nov-13-11 08:31 AM by Mendocino
in an elevator. The combined income was a billion. The average income was $500 million. I had no idea I was so rich and that poor Bill was having such a financial crisis. I loaned him a couple bucks, it was the least I could do. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renko Donating Member (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #12
35. If you find out, do let me know...
I've not 'enough posts' to send email (wtf?), but should be able to receive it.

I've long wondered the breakdown of median and average wages subtracting out the top 1%, 10%, and 20%.

I know roughly 1/2 of all 130ish million jobs pay less than $13/hr, and nearly 1/4 of *those* are minimum wage. But the *real* mean and median wages would be a powerful discussion/debating point.

Best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. Once you get to 50 posts, you will be able to send and receive private
messages.

You need to post more!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renko Donating Member (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #38
76. Thanks! ...
But I'm burned out after getting repeatedly banned from our local paper for posting the truth, facts, and cites (altho' occasionally a mite too strident-this is Iowa, what can you do?).

Will try, tho'.
Thanks and Best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'm as pissed off at "the man" as anyone, but this piece is ridiculous.
I hate it when someone posts a piece that intentionally attempts to mislead the reader to invoke outrage. The real figures are bad enough without having to undermine your credibility by cherry picking statistics to make it "seem worse."

#1 Only 58 percent of Americans have a job right now.

Yes, 58% of everyone including infants and geriatrics. So this is intentionally misleading. The participation rate for men 20 and over is 74%.

#2 Only 56 percent of Americans are currently covered by employer-provided health insurance.

Maybe, but 83% are covered by some kind of health insurance.

#3 The median yearly wage in the United States is $26,261.

Maybe, but median income is of little value when you have a large number of low-paying jobs. The average income is more useful, and that stands around $36,000. (Average household income is around $50K.)

I could go on, but you get the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. thank you for saving me the bother of posting the same point.
what was the old saying about statistics?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sammytko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Lies, damned lies, and statistics?
Yeah, looks o I ous, but really need to do some thinking on those numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dash Riprock Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #18
44. Take your pick.
Torture numbers, and they'll confess to anything. ~Gregg Easterbrook


98% of all statistics are made up. ~Author Unknown


Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital. ~Aaron Levenstein


Say you were standing with one foot in the oven and one foot in an ice bucket. According to the percentage people, you should be perfectly comfortable. ~Bobby Bragan, 1963


Statistics can be made to prove anything - even the truth. ~Author Unknown


Statistics are human beings with the tears wiped off. ~Paul Brodeur, Outrageous Misconduct


Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable. ~Author Unknown


Lottery: A tax on people who are bad at math. ~Author Unknown


He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts - for support rather than for illumination. ~Andrew Lang


One more fagot of these adamantine bandages is the new science of Statistics. ~Ralph Waldo Emerson


Statistics are like women; mirrors of purest virtue and truth, or like whores to use as one pleases. ~Theodor Billroth


Do not put your faith in what statistics say until you have carefully considered what they do not say. ~William W. Watt


Then there is the man who drowned crossing a stream with an average depth of six inches. ~W.I.E. Gates


There are two kinds of statistics, the kind you look up and the kind you make up. ~Rex Stout, Death of a Doxy


I always find that statistics are hard to swallow and impossible to digest. The only one I can ever remember is that if all the people who go to sleep in church were laid end to end they would be a lot more comfortable. ~Mrs. Robert A. Taft


Satan delights equally in statistics and in quoting scripture.... ~H.G. Wells, The Undying Fire


The average human has one breast and one testicle. ~Des McHale


While the individual man is an insoluble puzzle, in the aggregate he becomes a mathematical certainty. You can, for example, never foretell what any one man will be up to, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to. Individuals vary, but percentages remain constant. So says the statistician. ~Arthur Conan Doyle


A statistical analysis, properly conducted, is a delicate dissection of uncertainties, a surgery of suppositions. ~M.J. Moroney


Statistics may be defined as "a body of methods for making wise decisions in the face of uncertainty." ~W.A. Wallis


After all, facts are facts, and although we may quote one to another with a chuckle the words of the Wise Statesman, "Lies - damned lies - and statistics," still there are some easy figures the simplest must understand, and the astutest cannot wriggle out of. ~Leonard Courtney, speech, August 1895, New York, "To My Fellow-Disciples at Saratoga Springs," printed in The National Review (London, 1895) (Thanks, Mark)


Figures often beguile me, particularly when I have the arranging of them myself; in which case the remark attributed to Disraeli would often apply with justice and force: "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." ~Mark Twain, autobiography, 1904 (but, as yet no actual record of this under Disraeli's authorship)


The theory of probabilities is at bottom nothing but common sense reduced to calculus. ~Laplace, Théorie analytique des probabilités, 1820


I abhor averages. I like the individual case. A man may have six meals one day and none the next, making an average of three meals per day, but that is not a good way to live. ~Louis D. Brandeis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErikJ Donating Member (480 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Median is more accurate
Edited on Sat Nov-12-11 10:16 PM by ErikJ
Because you have lots of people making billions who unfairly weight the average higher. If you have 10 guys in a bar making average of $30 K suddenly joined by a billionaire their average income goes to $100 mill each.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
strategery blunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. You aren't exactly perfect, either...
I will give you points #1 and #2.

However, with point #3, yes, that's the point. Median means "half earn less, half earn more." When the top 1% are scamming, defrauding, and pilfering eight-and-nine figure compensation off the 99%, yes that will skew the arithmetic mean. Yes, there ARE a large number of low-paying jobs, too many of them relative to the economy because the 1% is hoarding all the productivity of said economy for themselves, and that's the point! Using the median accurately reflects this problem with the American economy, it reflects income inequality fairly (especially when contrasted to how the earnings of Bill Gates and hedge fund managers pull the mean up, reflecting prosperity that the 99% simply don't enjoy), and I don't see how using that statistic is deceptive. Not at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #14
48. It also irritates me to no end when people exaggerate the facts to push an agenda.
Yes, you are the right, the truth is bad enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #14
49. You are wrong about #1
If you go to the link, it posts where it gets its numbers. This is based on the total, non-institutional, 16 years and older, civilian population. It does NOT include infants and children. It does NOT include elderly people in nursing homes, rehab centers, hospitals or prison.

What I believe the poster and writer of the article are trying to articulate is that the adult Participation Rate has also dropped during this depression. America is back to 1984 civilian participation employment rates. After 1984, there was a general upward trend for employment participation. But since the depression, there is a continued decline. Considering the fact that the elderly are working longer into their golden years, this trend indicates that our newly graduating younger population is NOT finding jobs.

I hate it when someone attempts to clear up statistical information by providing more misleading information. The article was perfectly clear about their numbers. I could check your facts on the other statements but they are probably wrong too, and I'm bored now.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #49
51. Actually the decline started around year 2000 when the tech bubble burst..
Indicating the rise in labor force up to 2000 could also be considered a bubble and unrealistic and 64-65% may be more the norm and stable rate.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #51
57. Now that is a very interesting graph. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #57
80. Yes it is. That's a smaller impact from women entering the workforce than I would expect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #49
73. In 1984, stay-at-home people were there primarily by choice.
Today they're all engaged in gladiatorial combat for the few existing jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #14
52. Labor force participation was 64% before 2008.
You have to back 30 years or so to find a smaller rate, but the smaller rates back then were due more to women not yet joining the labor force as they have today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #52
86. Yes, and it is surprising how a 3% change feels like so much more
Edited on Sun Nov-13-11 02:27 PM by bhikkhu
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #14
55. PSPS, I think the point is being missed by you. No matter if you slice the median income at 36,000
or 50,000 it does not buy much in this ecomomy.... But the more important point is why does someone with 50,000 have to pay more for health care than congress, more for taxes than General Electric... the point of this list is that if compared to those millionaires running congress and wall street, 50,000 is a weekend trip to their home in the Hamptons or other destinations....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
72. Labor force participation in the last 15 years.
Edited on Sun Nov-13-11 12:08 PM by lumberjack_jeff
Here's the labor force participation rate in the US.


Here is the employment to population ratio among men.


If you're concerned with people, you want to know how the average person is doing, thus you use the median.

Average income is meaningless from a social policy standpoint except to note how equitably the income is spread around relative to the median.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnlinePoker Donating Member (837 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
77. Wrong on the first point.
Current employed people in the U.S. is 140.302 million. With a population of 312.598 million, this, in fact, is only 44.9% of the population.

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.a.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_States

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
15. They aren't going to be able to save everyone.
"That is one reason why I try to encourage everyone to become more independent of the system."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
999998th word Donating Member (555 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #15
37. What.....?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
16. We're number
One!!!!:sarcasm:

Well, I do believe we are number 1 in Income Inequality....Portugal trails us a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. k&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
19. I think #1 is misleading.
Since it is obviously counting kids and retired people and people who are too disabled to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sammytko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Right. The number employed in my household would've be "0"! We are retired
Bring in a decent income.

Just think, if the us was made up of families consisting of working dad, SAHM, and two kids, employment would only be 25%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #19
59. No, it is not counting kids or institutionalized adults.
Click on link, and then click on the link's link. It clearly identifies where it gets its numbers from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #19
70. Actually it's not including kids and retired people
Read the linked article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #70
84. I think it is usually all adults over 16, including students and retired people
The link may say one thing, but the data comes from here: http://www.bls.gov/cps/lfcharacteristics.htm#nlf. Its a pain to try to find individual bits of information in there, and there's so much that its easy to confuse things, but it is all there.

One "check" on the numbers is that total US jobs are about 140 million, and its pretty hard to get to the numbers in the OP to work unless you are looking at the great majority of the population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
28. But . . . it's not a Depression!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. Of course, it's a Depression -- and don't know how anyone could doubt that ... but as long as we
pretend that they are telling the truth about the "Great Recession" -- :puke:

Then they can get away with it -- !!


In fact, Obama called it a "depression" a year ago this August -- an article

popped up on Yahoo - -but before I got it posted "Depression" was scrubbed and

"recession" put in its place.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #34
69. Sorry, forgot the sarcasm smilie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #69
103. Just wanted to confirm what you were saying -- !!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colsohlibgal Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
30. Insanity And Legalized Theft
The bill of goods so many people swallowed is amazing.

If you'd like to see red read the book "Retirement Heist" by WSJ's Ellen Schultz, if you'd like to laugh while being totally alarmed read "Boomerang" by Michael Lewis.

Its been an ongoing money transfer upward of stunning proportions as a chosen few get filthy rich while people and countries go broke and so deep in debt.

It's been enabled here by the bad combo of the Murdoch media propoganda machine and enough dumbed down people who amazingly buy what they hear from Rush, Hannity, Beck and other traitorous liars/sociopaths.

Let us hope the reckoning/awakening comes soon enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
40. I have to take issue with # 7.
According to Rush Limbaugh America's poor have it far too good. Most of them have cable TV in every room, the internet, a refrigerator, a microwave and a car.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #40
54. ...and some of them have a pet for christs sake...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #54
60. They should have to eat the pet before they get food stamps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
50. #7
And yet probably way less than 50% of that 50% understand and or identify with the OWS movement.

It is sad to say, but on some level Americans are getting exactly what they deserve, they bend over and take it in favor of believing a bunch of bullshit spouted by the financial rapists and their political thugs.

I know this will change some day, people will eventually reach the point where they say "no mas" but that should have happened years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanks Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
58. So much
for that 'change and hope' we all got suckered into believing. Oh, sorry, I forgot - it ain't Obama's fault...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Systematic Chaos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #58
62. Your transparency is transparently transparent.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #58
65. It isn't.
This is 31 years of Crap-onomics coming to it's inevitable conclusion. If Obama's election means anything, it's the sun-glaring-in-your-face truism that our problems stretch far beyond presidents at this point. The system is broken and compromised by corporate America and the wealthy that run it from head to toe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #58
96. welcome to DU.
O_o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
63. Thanks for the facts Proud2.
We all know that we are in much worse shape economically and in most other ways. The statistics help us to realize how bad it actually is.

As a single male with heart disease and not a lot of prospects to improve my financial condition (although I am luckier than many, I have a home, etc.) it is impossible to seek a compatible mate. I am educated and I enjoy an intelligent person to be with. One who is not very materialistic. It is hard to start a relationship when you (at 50) say" I am retired and will probably not ever have a lot of material possessions, I don't do many physical activities, etc."

Our society is based on capitalism. It doesn't matter that you made good money (in another life) and have destroyed your credit trying to stay alive... Life today is based on materialism. Everything seems so shallow.

It may be harder on a young, healthy person who is unemployed or underemployed, IDK.

I do know that things are difficult for most people and "the American dream" has become less and less obtainable, yet "consumerism' paints a different picture..

Our society has changed dramatically in my life time and IMO not for the better. Americans must be aware of the truth of the world in which they live... excuse my rambling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
67. Hey now.....Obama says we are the ENVY OF THE WORLD!
:rofl: :silly: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseymoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
75. One interesting detail I notice

Americans are $7.7 trillion dollars poorer now than in 2007.

Didn't TARP cost about a $7 trillion? You add in about a ten percent for administration, and it adds up very closely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim_Shorts Donating Member (355 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
81. What drives me nuts
is when people quote the government released unemployment number,(currently 9%) it makes me want to bite the screen. The number is reached by looking at people who were actively searching for work in the last 4 weeks. (ie: collecting unemployment)

You may just as well use the number of people who just got fired from 7-Eleven in the last 3 days by a man named Bob.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judesedit Donating Member (450 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
82. This downslide started years before Obama took office. Unless you're a millionaire, if you vote for
a republican, you're voting AGAINST yourself. In case you haven't noticed, the republicans have voted down anything Obama has tried to do for you. The GOP is comfortably in the pockets of the lobbyists for big oil, pharma, and Wall St. Half of "our" Congress are millionaires. Do you think they want change? They are fighting to continue getting richer, while you continue getting poorer. The GOP is trying to redistrict, change election rules, disenfranchize minority voters, keep e-voting machines at our polling places, do anything they can to lie, cheat and steal their way to a victory..like they have been doing forever. Wake up and educate yourselves because apparently you got a lousy education in this country if you think this is Obama's doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judesedit Donating Member (450 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #82
85. Get the money OUT of politics and watch the wage gap between the 1% and 99% start to shrink
The lobbyists and their puppets running this country have sold everything they can in this country, to include jobs, industry, parks, ports, cities, bridges, water, housing, etc., to foreign investors for $$$$$$ for their own use and put that money in foreign banks so they can't be taxed on it. We don't even make our own pharmaceuticals anymore. You trust that? The greed and ignorance in this country is astounding. To cheer when an influential "American" says, "let them die if they don't have health insurance" or "waterboarding is okay in time of war", even if we start the war to steal foreign oil, is pathetic. Some still believe Saddam had something to do with 9/11. These ignorant blood-thirsty war mongers are the biggest terrorists of all and they live right here. Funny how the people who create all this devastation never have to feel the effects of their work. They are buying acres of land in other countries and building underground cities here for themselves so they can run and hide with their $$$$ when the shit hits the fan. Get with it people, vote the money OUT of politics and use an absentee ballot if possible. Or you are seeing the beginning of the end of America. And it's got almost nothing to do with Obama. This has been in the works for decades. Do your homework.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty fender Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #85
92. True, Obama did not create this mess, but
he isn't doing anything to ameliorate it.x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
83. Our Economic Mess Is A By Product of Globalization
Globalization exists because that's how we fund our MIC. We outsource overseas and create trade imbalances. Then the countries with a trade surplus with us, use their surpluses to buy our debt. And that money funds our MIC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DianeK Donating Member (612 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
94. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
97. Lets keep having babies.
That'll fix everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
98. K&R
Edited on Sun Nov-13-11 05:22 PM by DeSwiss
- Sometimes even I get tired of pointing out the obvious. But once again I'll try: This is what it's like to be a slave. WE. ARE. SLAVES.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xbp6umQT58A">The Story Of Your Enslavement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
99. I'm not even mildly surprised.
I'm living it, my friends are living it. What surprises me is the fact that our government, both dems and rethugs, are pretending it really doesn't matter and instead spending our tax dollars liberating everybody but their own citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
100. K&R for the FACTS. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-13-11 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
101. Send to Obama. Tell him to get home.. quit signing deals for Asian "Fair" Trade.
Obama come home. Get off vacation. NO MORE FREE TRADE.. as if the Korean and Colombian deals were not bad enough. How about some "Fair" trade deals for a change?

Mr. Obama.. I am really begining to dislike the sight of you.. just like George Bush.

Not a hater.. just a realist.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
104. "Should I buy a Prius?" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC