Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cain's a Rare Bird - A Republican Who's NOT Odious

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
SoDesuKa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 03:23 AM
Original message
Cain's a Rare Bird - A Republican Who's NOT Odious
Most Republicans locate themselves on various degrees of the odium scale, ranging from the slightly odious Michael Bloomberg to the extremely odious Sean Hannity. Most Republican leaders are at the Hannity end of the scale, and only a few at the Bloomberg end. Herman Cain, despite his somewhat unfortunate positions, actually wins the Rachel Maddow seal of approval as a guy who seems hip enough to be putting us on. Cain tells jokes, he breaks into song, and he gets caught in clumsy lies. This is a Republican I might actually like, if such a thing were possible.

Please don't beat me up for this. I would never vote for the guy. But he's such a change from the run-of-the-mill Republican that I have to applaud. Where'd he come from? Are there others like him? I loved the Yellow Flowers ad; I thought it was actually hip. Imagine that in a Republican. What's the party of Richard Nixon coming to?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSlC7BxmSqY



The Yellow Flowers Ad - a wonderful spoof

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
deafskeptic Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. uh?
WTF are you smoking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Guess that's a matter of personal opinion
I personally find him odius, obnoxious and repulsive. :puke: x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. quite odious indeed. About 999 on the odious scale
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
SoDesuKa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 04:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Granny Goose Potato Chips
Here's a commercial that hasn't aged well. When it was new back in the 60's, it put the Oakland-based snack food maker on the map.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlyzY139Wfg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
themadstork Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bloomberg is only slightly odious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoDesuKa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. Bloomberg Moved Up Perceptibly
Bloomberg moved up a couple of notches on the odium scale in the past month. Before that, the needle moved but not a lot. Now of course there's no doubt about his creepiness. However, he's still some distance away from the first class assholes who are clustered in abundance at the Hannity end of the scale, the ones it's painful even to look at. There are so many! Ann Coulter, Jim DeMint, Chris Wallace, the loathsome Arnold Schwarzeneggar, John Boehner, Eric Cantor . . . what a team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. You don't find sexual harassment odious?
How about lying about sexual harassment allegations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
court jester Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 04:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Paula Jones did
"...Paula Corbin Jones ... is a former Arkansas state employee who sued U.S. President Bill Clinton for sexual harassment. The lawsuit was dismissed before trial on the grounds that Jones failed to demonstrate any damages. However, while the dismissal was being appealed, Clinton entered into an out-of-court settlement, agreeing to pay Jones and her attorneys a total of $850,000..."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paula_Jones

this is an area that (D)emocrats might not want to wander into...

Herman Cain is despicable for lots of other reasons

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. "this is an area that (D)emocrats might not want to wander into..."
Edited on Sun Nov-06-11 05:10 AM by MilesColtrane
Thanks for your sincere concern, Chief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 05:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
court jester Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. John Edwards Thanks You
only Republicans act like scumbags

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Wow, you really laid waste to that assertion I didn't make!
Edited on Sun Nov-06-11 06:45 AM by MilesColtrane
Your work here is done.

Somewhere there is someone else on the internet that needs your rapier keen wit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Clinton's running for president again? Man. I'm out of touch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. the Paula Jones accusation had absolutely not credibility - but to be fair we don't know what the
Edited on Sun Nov-06-11 06:00 AM by Douglas Carpenter
accusations against Herman Cain are. So as completely uninformed, unqualified and extreme as Herman Cain is - we don't know one single detail about the accusations - so I have to agree that it would be irrational and unfair to pass judgment in the absence of even knowing what what he was accused of.

In regards to Paula Jones - even the Arkansas State Troopers who did verify that they knew that Bill Clinton had been seeing other women - consensually - have stated clearly that Paula Jones had actually approached them both before and after meeting Bill Clinton to ask them to deliver messages to then Governor Clinton that she is available if he would like a girlfriend. Multiple sources verify that she was very proud to know then Governor Clinton and bragged that there might be something special between her and him. According to numerous witnesses her claims of victimization only surfaced when offered fame and fortune from right-wing activist seeking to end the Clinton presidency.

However, most of us were prepared to stop and listen to the facts when it concerned President Clinton before making any judgments. And as we all know, he was not terribly forthcoming. But then again I cannot say that I blame him. But on the principle that what is good for the goose is good for the gander - it is not fair to draw any conclusions regarding Herman Cain's alleged improprieties when we don't even know what he was accused of. What we can draw conclusions on is that he didn't know that China has had nuclear weapons for almost 50 years and he doesn't know anything about almost any other issue that is important for the country. That would is a fair and rational judgment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
court jester Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. so why did Mr. Nafta deposit $850,000 into her bank account?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. they wanted it off the books
I have plenty of complaints about Bill Clinton. In some ways he was more reactionary than Ronald Reagan at least in terms of policies that he actually implemented. But the Paula Jones case just didn't hold water. His presidency was besieged from day one by a campaign of vilification led by people who can be described as extremist kooks. By the time they made the payment - they were simply sick of the whole thing and paid the money to make it go away. If I was in his position I probably would have done the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
19. Bwahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
All I'm hearing from the right is that Cain's behavior is "no big deal". This from the very people who hounded AND IMPEACHED Bill Clinton for the same thing. You're goddamn right we're going to "wander into" this. Bunch of fucking hypocrites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
15. The 999 policy....
.... is no joke and its among the most regressive possible tax policies. At a time when we need to be helping the poor and middle classes, Cain wants to twist the knife.

Your take on reality is way off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
18. A funny "sell-out" opportunist is a Good "sell-out" opportunist?
Sort of like saying there are "good" traitors and "bad" traitors...

To me, if there is a "good" Republican, it is one who will compromise for the greater good and stand up to the extremists of his/her party, even if it means losing reelection. I've not seen one of those in recent decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lizzie Poppet Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
20. As hypocritical horndogs go, sure... not odious.
Let's see: terrible political positions, demontrated lack of character, pungently hypocritical (slams the bailouts/stimulus, but is on the board of several corporations that took them), probably a serial sexual harasser...

Oh, no, not odious at all. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
22. Well guess his public relations folks have you eating out of their hands.
It would appear you have bought their line completely, hook, line, and sinker as they used to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
23. He's odious too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
24. most Americans appreciate a good joke. That doesn't mean they like a joke played on them.
Cain is pretty far out there, I will agree with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-11 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
25. "One may smile, and smile, and be a villain..."
Edited on Sun Nov-06-11 09:15 AM by The Velveteen Ocelot
Cain is just as odious as the rest of them. A big smile and those weirdly clever ads (performance art, if you like) don't change the fact that he's just as wingnutty and hateful as all the other creeps on the Hannity end of the scale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC