Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TechDirt: Ronald Reagan Library Indoctrinating Children To Hate Freedom Of The Press?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 01:36 PM
Original message
TechDirt: Ronald Reagan Library Indoctrinating Children To Hate Freedom Of The Press?


Indoctrinating Children To Hate Freedom Of The Press?
January 18, 2011

just listened to a recent podcast from This American Life with the theme of "Kid Politics." As per usual, it's an entertaining hour, but the First Act struck me as especially interesting, given the current debates about Wikileaks and free speech. In that story, reporter and TAL regular Starlee Kine visits the Ronald Reagan library, where a bunch of school children visit and run through an exercise in which they get to simulate the invasion of Grenada and get to make all the decisions just like Reagan did. They're prepped for this with a bit of laughably propaganda-filled version of history (e.g. if we didn't invade Grenada, then Grenada, Cuba and Nicaragua would have invaded the US and made us communist). Then, they go through this simulation -- in which they're told there are "no right or wrong answers." However, it later turns out that if you answer differently than Ronald Reagan actually did, an angry buzzer buzzes and the students are told they're wrong -- if you answer the same as Reagan, a bell dings, and the students are told they made "the correct choice." In most cases, of course, the students are led to the "easy" answer being exactly what Reagan did.

Then, suddenly, in the middle of the exercise, the evil press ruins everything, by revealing that two US carriers have been rerouted to Grenada, ruining the element of surprise. To be honest, if you look through historical reports of the invasion of Grenada, the press leaking this bit of information is pretty hard to find. Yet, in the Reagan Library, it's the key to the whole story. The element of surprise has been blown, and now the faux-Reagan needs to decide whether to move forward with the invasion. The "correct" answer, of course, is yes -- and woe is the poor child Reagan-stand-in who suggests that perhaps it's best to focus on just evacuating the US medical students in Grenada first, and consider an invasion at a later date when the element of surprise has returned.

But after the story plays out to the inevitable, rose-tinted-glasses-of-retrospect conclusion, the library staffer makes sure that the kids in the fake Oval Office know that everything would have worked much better if that darn press hadn't interfered. And while freedom of the press is discussed briefly, the woman encourages students to think about the value of self-censorship of the press, reinforcing it by asking the students if the press should have reported on the news, to which they all say no. She follows this up immediately by suggesting that the 19 soldiers who lost their lives in Grenada was really due to the press and their big mouths, with an amusing hedge about how "we can't directly say that's because of the press, but... did it help that they released the story?" The students (who had been divided into different groups -- including some who play "the press") are brought back together, and the child-politicians immediately start attacking the child-press for killing 19 soldiers. The child-press are suddenly being accused of being murderers, and are pressured into agreeing that the press should simply shut up when it has information like this.

It's really disturbing to listen to this.

Read the full article at:

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110117/23364212705/indoctrinating-children-to-hate-freedom-press.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. It is the raygun liebrary after all. The truth is expendable. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Indoctrination techniques.
Would make Khmer Rouge jealous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. I heard this over the weekend while driving
almost crashed my car
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Same here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Same here...pissed me off for sure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. I would expect nothing less from the Reagan Library
This is sickening. Where are the pundits who accused Obama of trying to brainwash and indoctrinate kids with his message to school children (that told them to study).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. Speaking of pro-Reagan lies and cover-ups
Try finding out about Raygun's destruction of Pres. Carter's energy independence program --which would have had us 100% energy independent by the year 2000.

I wrote an email to the Raygun "Lie-barry" to ask them why they have no information about Raygun removing the solar panels from the White House and his herculean efforts to end the energy independence programs. They sent some BS reply that didn't even address my question.

PS, here's a question for ya. If we had been energy independent since the year 2000, would we be in the same economic mess we're in today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I believe the answer to your question is yes. De-regulation of Wall Street was the primary cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I retract the question...
I guess it's pointless to try to play "what if" with history...

Still pissed at Ronnie Raygun for being a willing co-conspirator in the destruction of America, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. It was a good question and Reagan does bare some responsibility for the crisis afflicting us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swilton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. Grenada
Reagan's war that supposedly cured the Vietnam War syndrome...After all the Vietnam War was lost not due to hubris and/or faulty foreign policy but because of our press.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-18-11 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yeah, those tiny island nations can cause such terror in World Superpowers
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC