Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Historic Siegelman Case Showdown Looms Nov. 2

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 05:58 PM
Original message
Historic Siegelman Case Showdown Looms Nov. 2
http://www.justice-integrity.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=489:historic-siegelman-case-showdown-looms-nov-2&catid=44:myblog

Historic Siegelman Case Showdown Looms Nov. 2
By Andrew Kreig

A legal showdown of historic proportion unfolds Nov. 2 in an Alabama federal court. Squaring off in Montgomery Courtroom B4 at 10 am in the courthouse portrayed below are the Obama Justice Department and its most important domestic defendant, former Alabama Gov. Don Siegelman, once the leading Democrat in his state. Siegelman wants the government to provide documents proving that Middle District U.S. Attorney Leura Canary really withdrew from the case, as she claimed. The government contends he is not entitled to confidential government documents.

Siegelman after five years has finally won a hearing before a new judge, Charles S. Coody, on a request for documents that are central to the 2006 convictions on corruption charges. Beyond that, Siegelman is in the rare position of having witnesses step forward to provide evidence that his prosecutors and trial judge framed him. But both the Bush and Obama officials have withheld the documents. Meanwhile, Siegelman has been tried and sentenced to a lengthy prison term in what our Justice Integrity Project, among others, has described as the nation's most notorious political prosecution in decades. That's all been written many times, and is synopsized below with both sources and denials.

The main and more novel focus of my column today is how this case exemplifies others around the nation whereby the Obama administration fails to protect our nation's precious legacy of due process. Already, this disgraceful pattern has deeply damaged Obama's re-election chances and legacy, probably irreparably.

You don't believe that? I can understand that. I repeatedly encounter in Washington and elsewhere well-established, reasonably well-informed professionals in journalism, law or politics who have barely, if ever, heard of Siegelman and his ordeal. Many of them are immersed in mainstream political punditry, typified by the chatter on Sunday morning news talk shows. Their lack of awareness of the dark and dirty secrets in political prosecutions doesn't surprise me. The Washington Post has never published an in-depth story on the Siegelman case despite what must be at least 100,000 citizen protests to the White House, DOJ and news organizations. The important but far-from-definitive reporting by the New York Times and CBS News in 2007-2008 has long since disappeared. Most other news organizations have scant resources to report on Alabama. So, they rely on skimpy wire service summaries of local news reports and official documents. Beyond that, busy professionals tend to assume, in a Civics 101 mindset, that Democrats in an Obama administration along with the inherent fairness of the judicial system would correct any partisan irregularities remaining from the Bush-Rove era.

MORE

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. ''...both the Bush and Obama officials have withheld the documents...''
Anyone who gives a damn about Justice and this nation should follow this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I wonder if they think they can lie about it
Like with the new FOIA interpretation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Throw in Cass Sunstein's desire to infiltrate conspiracy theorists who don't by the govt story...
...from A to 9-11, and it looks like America, we have a problem.

Obama Confidant's Spine-Chilling Proposal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You always have the good stuff
How did I miss that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Yes, I agree Octafish.
Has he filed a FOIA to get them? This seems so wrong, to deny someone access to evidence that affects their freedom.

Shame on the DOJ for not starting another, separate investigation based on the information now available to them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. knr nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, at least Obama is PARTLY on the side of truth and justice.
Which makes him twice as good as any Republican and half as good as any real Democrat (like Don Seligman).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-11 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. Thanks for the update.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC