Michael Moore calls Obama's first term "heartbreaking". (Audio)

[Courtesy Flush]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-15436444

[ananda]

1. MM is so right... as usual.

nt

[blueknight]

2. he should have said

" ONLY" term, and that breaks MY heart. he had so much potential....

[Itchinjim]

3. 242...

[dionysus]

10. They're just heartbroken, heartbroken i tell ya...

:rofl:

[bluedave]

4. basically

we are screwed but the alternative would be much worse--too bad Hillary isn't in it.

[Courtesy Flush]

8. I know that's a sore subject at DU, but

I really wish Hillary were president instead of Obama.

[HughBeaumont]

13. Yeah, because her hawkishness and laissez-fail Free-trade leanings would be SO much better.

:eyes:

Hillary is possibly less of an economic progressive than her husband was. Many posters have proven this over and over again during the primaries. Nothing would have been any different.

[Donnachaidh]

14. really? Do you think perhaps with her connections to the tar sands fiasco

she might be -worse-?

[dionysus]

9. .

:rofl:

[Le Taz Hot]

12. Oh, yeah, 'cause Hillary isn't just as much of a corporate

lackey as Obama is? Please. :eyes:

[warrior1]

5. bull shit

He's not a one term president. I am so sick of this shit.

[RC]

7. And that is the sad part, he won't be.

He had so much promise during the campaign. What happened once he got in the door? It wasn't the Party of NO! either.

[woo me with science]

6. I can't think of a better word for it.

Perhaps "outrageous."

[Le Taz Hot]

11. And he's right.

SO much opportunity and support completely missed and gone forever. Btw, I see the Boosters are up early this morning.

[Township75]

15. Failure would be better. Can you imagine giving Bush a congress with such a large majority?

A president like Bush would have gotten anything he wanted done with such a large majority in congress. Even Bill Clinton would have moved mountains with such a large majority in congress.

This guy is just a poor leader. Flat out bad.