Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Bolton: The Wars are for Oil

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 03:27 PM
Original message
John Bolton: The Wars are for Oil
See the Pride of Plato's Retreat state it in his professorial, if practiced, way:



The United States went to war for oil.

"Well, Iran has made little secret of its desire to gain hegemony in the
Persian Gulf, the critical oil and natural gas producing region that
we fought so many wars to try and protect our economy from the adverse impact
of losing that supply or having it available only at very high prices..." -- John Bolton, "ambassador" by default

Humph. Not all that original a thought, seeing how Henry Kissinger said the same thing,
as did Alan Greenspan and a whole bunch more satraps of the 1-Percent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. D
uh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You are well informed, mmonk.
Unfortunately, my Friend, that puts you in the minority.

An example: I believe you know, but how many people do you know who remember George Herbert Walker "Poppy" Bush lied the United States into Gulf War 1?

The guy did say Saddam was like Hitler. And if anyone should know Hitler...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yep.
Fortunes are made in the trade craft of war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. ''Money trumps peace.''
This is news to my Republican neighbors. And they get visibly angry when it's brought to their attention:



Hear and see the Giggling Warmonger say it.

""Let's put it this way. Uh. Money trumps peace. Sometimes. Heh heh heh.
In other words, commercial interests are very powerful interests. Throughout the world."
-- Crazy Warmonkey George Walker Bush, appointed pretzeldent

I remember Cindy Sheehan tried to bring it to our nation's attention.

Unfortunately, not many people listen to Ms. Sheehan -- especially those in authority.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. One can even add to the chimp's words.
Edited on Mon Oct-24-11 04:53 PM by mmonk
War is money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Too bad the one President I remember who took the opposing view was assassinated.
JFK thought we should explore outer space -- the New Frontier -- in peace. Thus, he gave a civilian agency management of the manned space program.

In the process, the United States accomplished what had been considered impossible for most of humanity's existence. We ventured to the moon and back. And we did so in less time than the decade prescribed.

Imagine what we could do using the nation's economic might, workforce and brainpower? It's easy to see how humanity could mine the moon and asteroids, establish bases on the moon and Mars, explore the outer planets -- all in peace.

We also could accomplish even greater things on earth, with such a can-do spirit and attitude. I believe we'd be able to solve our world's problems -- from hunger and diseases to ignorance to resource depletion to pollution and over-population -- through peaceful means.

Of course, peace means cooperation. And when people cooperate, they get to know and like each other. And when people like each other, it's harder to scare and divide them. Unity makes people harder to conquer, which brings us back to the current state of affairs.

War is money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. k&r...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Lysistrata Project
A handy compendium of fact:

War & Oil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. No coincidence that Libya also has a shitload of oil
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. No coincidence whatsoever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Thomas Friedman himself said the oil might be the smaller part of the war on Iraq.
Edited on Mon Oct-24-11 05:05 PM by Octafish
The main part was to stop the dictator from using his WMDs on us.

A War for Oil?

WMDs -- especially nuclear weapons -- were the same story Poppy Bush used to garner public support for the First Iraq War, back in 1990.

I was a reporter then, and I remember how quickly the public opinion changed from being against a war to "liberate" Kuwait to one of stopping a threat to America.

The oil never was a reason stated out loud then, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. And we know we can scrap his #1 reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Yes ...
a friend of ours was working Benghazi a few years ago and mentioned the possible new oil discoveries in Libya :(



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. Thanks, Octa. What would we do without you? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Thank you, BlueIris. Very much appreciate it. However, I gootta give credit where credit is due...
CounterPunch featured the YouTube thingy as their "Website of the Day" today.

Allow me to make it up by linking to a CounterPunch article by Milan Rai from February 2003: Oil and War.

Main Point: This is not a war for oil. It is a war to control the profits that flow from oil.

That's the truth. Especially when considering that a year's oil revenues exceed the combined budgets of all the governments in the world.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I think that point is key.
And it explains quite a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dragonfli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. Here is a picture of that neanderthal without TV make-up-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. So easy, a cavewoman could do him.
That image shows what a 1,000 words may not, the truth.

And since we're on the subject:

Reagan, the Bushes, and Saddam Hussein

EXCERPT...

According to Larry Birns, director of the Washington-based Council on Hemispheric Affairs, Noriega insisted to him that he had had the best of relations with Bush for years. But Noriega told Birns that at an airport meeting in Panama shortly before the invasion, he had had a spat with Vice President Dan Quayle when he refused to commit Panama to a more confrontational role in fighting against Washington’s Central American enemies. Birns, who was in Panama as Noriega’s “honorable enemy” guest only hours before the U.S. invasion and was arguably the last American to meet with Noriega before U.S. troops arrived, told me that the Panamanian strongman was bitter because after years of servitude to Washington’s various regional crusades, Bush was unceremoniously dumping him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. Well when people go apeshit when the price goes up he kind of has a point
Our economy is based on oil.

The only reliable way of insuring access to oil is the use of military force.

That's been US policy since the Embargo in 1973.

Of course, we could devote resources to finding alternatives but that would be too much of a hassle, as long as it's mostly brown people who are dying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-11 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Americans kept cool as Bush accomplished his mission...
Gas cost $1.46 when he, uh, took office. It went as high as $4 something.



I got angry, but didn't hear too many others voice it.

The thing is, whenever there's a war for oil, oil prices skyrocket.
As Greg Palast notes, war makes the world's reserves more valuable
and the Saudis (among other people and corporations) even richer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC