What is going on here? How did a venerable left-wing target become an apparently convenient right-wing target?
There are three political aspects of
the right’s attack on GE which, while
a little sudden and certainly open to charges of hypocrisy, are easy to explain. First, in many cases,
the attackers try to establish an explicit link between GE and the Solyndra affair, hoping to whip up voter anger over the idea that government in general, and the Obama administration in particular, is throwing money at companies and thereby reviving that scary industrial-policy no-no of picking winners and losers.
The logic here is questionable—with $12.6 billion in profits last year, GE is no Solyndra—but the issue of how much money the federal government should invest in private companies is certainly open to debate.
A second political motivation has to do with who’s inside the GE charm circle and who’s outside. GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt may not have calculated just how much political capital he was investing when he decided to become the Obama administration’s “job czar” last January—or exactly what the return on that investment would look like...
Finally, remember the all-important independent voter.
There’s long been a small overlap between left-leaning populists and right-leaning independent voters (think Ralph Nader), and right-leaning populists and left-leaning independent voters (think Ross Perot and Ron Paul—you’ll see more than a few “End the Fed” T-shirts and drug-legalization sympathizers at the Occupy Wall Street camp). These may not be viable long-term strategies, but if you’re Newt Gingrich at this stage in the GOP contest, you get your votes by any means necessary.
GE’s meager tax bill remains an issue; perhaps it should be considered progress that the right has now joined the left in thundering over it. The issue of “crony capitalism,” however, is loaded in a way that makes political consensus seem unlikely. Back in the days when the Pentagon was signing GE’s checks, there were few cries from the right about anything improper. Surely believers in the free market don’t expect the federal government to build its own nuclear weapons, and since only a handful of companies can do that anyway, well, cronyism seems like a necessary byproduct.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/13/idUS404696369420111013