All the while it compares the push to repeal DADT to a conspiracy to commit murder.
"How many brave men and women are liberals willing to sacrifice so that homosexuals can flaunt their lifestyle? The only reason for changing the present policy is if it would help the military accomplish its mission. So far, no one has produced a single reason how it would. Until then, the Senate has to ask itself: Do they want the blood of innocent soldiers on their hands just to appease the political base of Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.)? If they can live with that, then they're unlike any human beings I've ever met."
"Our nation is threatened today, within and without, by those who oppose Biblical truth, Biblical moral standards and freedom of speech among Bible believers. We who pray must invoke the supernatural intervention of God so that those who seek to foist ungodly laws upon our nation will be confused, divided, and prevented from achieving their evil plans."
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/frc-losing-it-over-dadtHow many types of 'evil plans' are there? Getting together a group of buddies and plotting mass murder? I'd call that an evil plan. To commit acts of terrorism? Evil plan. Rob some cancer patients? Evil plan. But to repeal DADT? Seriously?
It's time to call on the FRC to start debating and stop hating, stop using fallacies and stop calling themselves "good" while calling their opponents "evil".