Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bank of New York Mellon Being Sued for Fraud on Exchange Rates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 12:31 PM
Original message
Bank of New York Mellon Being Sued for Fraud on Exchange Rates
Edited on Tue Oct-11-11 12:37 PM by JCMach1
Thanks to Max Keiser for reporting on this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=behbKi7ef8I

Here are more details from the NY Times Blogs...

The Justice Department and the New York attorney general, Eric T. Schneiderman, filed separate civil charges last week against Bank of New York Mellon, accusing it of defrauding customers of its foreign exchange services. The cases raise sticky questions about when marketing claims cross the imperceptible line from puffery to fraud.

The bank used phrases like “best execution” and “most competitive rates” in promoting its services, while the complaints assert it overcharged a number of pension funds and governments by secretly taking advantage of spreads in the prices for foreign currencies to reap profits...

Unlike a privately negotiated trade that would be much more cumbersome, the standing instruction service is an easy way for customers to have foreign exchange transactions completed because Bank of New York Mellon simply puts through the trade without needing any further authorization from the customer.

The Justice Department’s complaint contends that the bank “consistently gives standing instruction clients virtually the worst rates of the day,” and the New York attorney general argues that it “flagrantly misrepresented” its practices by stating that it was using the “best rate of the day.” The federal suit asserts that Bank of New York Mellon violated the mail and wire fraud statutes, while the New York action alleges breaches of the Martin Act, the state’s broad securities fraud statute... http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/10/10/the-difference-between-puffery-and-fraud/


The running assumption IS... Of course, they will get away with it! And of course, the NYT is defending them in this piece!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rdking647 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. why is it always civil charges
charge them with criminal violations.. it will put the bank out of business and serve as a warning to other banks the the shit they have been doing wont be tolerated any more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Also good to note... IT'S PENSION FUNDS!!! Chances are there are DUers here today that have had
money stolen by this bank because they are almost the sole market maker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC