Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FDIC backs ban on banks trading for own profit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 09:47 AM
Original message
FDIC backs ban on banks trading for own profit
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_VOLCKER_RULE?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2011-10-11-10-36-33

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Banks would be barred from trading for their own profit instead of their clients under a rule being proposed by federal regulators.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. backed the rule on a 3-0 vote. The ban on so-called proprietary trading was required under last year's financial overhaul law.

For years, banks had bet on risky investments with their own money. But when those bets go bad and banks fail, taxpayers could be forced to bail them out. That's what happened during the 2008 financial crisis.

The Federal Reserve also approved the draft rule. The Securities and Exchange Commission and Treasury Department must still vote. All four regulators will vote on a final version of the rule after a period of public comment. It is expected to take effect next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
banned from Kos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. But, but, I'm told that Democrats are owned by the bankers!
(sarcasm intended)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. LOL!
Yeah, mighty holes are being torn in all those RW talking points that are being furthered by alleged Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's ok to trade for their own account... they just shouldn't do it "naked".
There's nothing wrong, for instance, with derivative investing... so long as you're hedging a position in the other direction. So if your portfolio is particularly sensitive to interest rate increases, it would be ok to get a leveraged investment that would perform well in that environment.

Such a move actually reduces risk and should not be banned. It's the banks that made big "naked" bets that got caught with their pants down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's them using other peoples money to do so and the solvency of their bank. Both of those...
...are a good reason to tell them no, especially if they're looking for a handout later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. another article: Volcker Rule Plan Released by Regulators
Edited on Tue Oct-11-11 10:28 AM by xchrom
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-10-11/volcker-restrictions-on-banks-trading-set-for-release-by-fdic.html

U.S. regulators requested public comment on Dodd-Frank Act restrictions that would ban U.S. banks from making short-term trades of financial instruments for their own accounts and prevent them from owning or sponsoring hedge funds and private-equity funds.

The so-called Volcker rule, released today by the Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, is aimed at heading off risk-taking that helped fuel the 2008 credit crisis.

The language of the rule is little changed from drafts that have been leaking in recent weeks. It would ban banks from taking positions held for 60 days or less, exempt certain market-making activities, change the way traders involved in market-making are compensated and make senior bank executives responsible for compliance.

The board of the FDIC is voting today on whether to seek comments on the proposal through January 13. The Federal Reserve also said it would accept feedback by that date.


edit: spelling is a problem today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC