Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President Obama: America 'Not Better Off' Today than Four Years Ago

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 02:27 PM
Original message
President Obama: America 'Not Better Off' Today than Four Years Ago
Edited on Tue Oct-04-11 02:31 PM by Better Believe It


President Obama: America 'Not Better Off' Today than Four Years Ago
By RUSSELL GOLDMAN
October 3, 2011


Calling himself an "underdog," President Obama today said the faltering economy is a drag on his presidency and seriously impairing his chances of winning again in 2012.

"Absolutely," he said in response to a question from ABC News' George Stephanopoulos about whether the odds were against him come November 2012, given the economy. "I'm used to being the underdog. But at the end of the day people are going to ask -- who's got a vision?"

The American people, he conceded, are "not better off" than they were four years ago.

"The unemployment rate is way too high," he said of the 9 percent jobless rate, the highest in more than half a century.

Read the full article at:

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/president-obama-calls-underdog-2012-race-white-house/story?id=14656286


-----------------------------------------------

President Obama and I Are in Full Agreement About 2012
By: Jon Walker
October 4, 2011


There are at least two areas where President Obama and I are in full agreement: his chances in the 2012 election and the current state of regular Americans’ economic lives.

Obama is the underdog for the simple reason that the American people are very clearly not better off than when Obama took office. That question, “are you better off than you were before the last election?” is normally not just the decisive question in American President elections but the decisive question in almost any democracy. In any democracy if the incumbent leader/party doesn’t improve the country for the broad electorate, the electorate normally chooses to remove them from power.

From a campaign messaging perspective, it is probably smart that Obama admits now he is likely going to lose. Since the American people are worse off, Obama can’t really run on his record, so his campaign is likely to be focused heavily on making the Republican alternative appear totally unacceptable.

By talking about how he could lose early in the cycle, Obama is laying the ground work to get voters to not just think about how bad things have been for the past three years, but also to think about what kind of President the Republican nominee will make. The more time voters spend worrying about the very real possibility of how Rick Perry would run the country

http://elections.firedoglake.com/2011/10/04/president-obama-and-i-are-in-full-agreement-about-2012/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think here Obama is selling himself short
Edited on Tue Oct-04-11 02:39 PM by WI_DEM
While the economy isn't doing well what he inherited was an economy on the verge of collapse. He has to a certain extent stabilized things and while the recovery is so far jobless (though the unemployment rate did at one time exceed 10% and it's down to 9.1% now), the measures he did take, while incomplete and not nearly enough did eventually bring the economy out of recession and we have had several quarters of growth, though it has been sluggish growth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Where? Obama's approval rating is BELOW 40% --
Edited on Tue Oct-04-11 04:25 PM by defendandprotect
Gallup Daily: Obama Job Approval
Gallup Daily: Obama Job Approval Each result is based on a three-day rolling ... Presidential Job Approval Center. Get Obama's latest approval ratings now and compare to
www.gallup.com/.../Gallup-Daily-Obama-Job-Approval.aspx

Obama approval rating dips below 40%
President Obama hit a dubious milestone today, sinking below a 40% approval rating in the Gallup daily tracking poll. Only 39% of respondents approve of Obama's job ...
content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2011/08/... - Cached
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2011/08/obama-approval-rating-dips-below-40/1

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #14
26. He's at 42% today.
http://www.gallup.com/home.aspx

Your first link is dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. ROFL: Disapprove 50% -- up 1 -- and look at the rest of it -- !!! Yikes!!
Us Employment --
Underemployed 18.2%
Unemployed 8.7%

Economic Conditions
Excellent/Good 10%
Poor 57% -- <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Economic Outlook
Getting better 28%
Getting Worse 76% --- <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Life Evaluation
Thriving 51%
Struggling 45%

Economic Confidence MINUS 54 down -3
Job Creation -- 10 - down -2



66 MILLION AMERICANS NOW LIVING IN POVERTY

50 MILLION WITH NO HEALTH CARE


HAPPY DAYS ARE HERE AGAIN -- !!





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. 42% > "BELOW 40%." Moving the goalposts doesn't change that fact. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. You're correct by one day -- one day prior it was BELOW 40% -- !!
Edited on Thu Oct-06-11 08:30 AM by defendandprotect
Nor does ignoring the other indications of the distress of the nation change

the fact of the reality of it --

45% of the nation is "struggling" --

50% disapprove -- !!







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stockholmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. running a 'you have no choice as the alternative is even worse' campaign is pure, blind cynicism,and
is utterly unacceptable to ever affecting even a sliver of positive results for a nation state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Even if that is true, we are better off then we would have been
Edited on Tue Oct-04-11 02:39 PM by Rex
if John McCain was POTUS for the last 4 years. Of that I have no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That would not be a good campaign theme or slogan. "It would have been worse under McCain"
Edited on Tue Oct-04-11 03:27 PM by Better Believe It
I agree it probably would have been worse and had McCain won the Presidency, Democrats would win the 2012 election by an even bigger landslide than in 2008.

Another bad slogan or theme .... "Obama has a vision for the future".

Vision isn't what people are looking for.

Vision doesn't put food on the table.

The people want decent jobs, a better life, a secure retirement, universal health care, less war and higher living standards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. But they won't get those things, 'America' has spoken and corporations
Edited on Tue Oct-04-11 03:29 PM by Rex
are in charge of things now. It is so obvious, even my father has noticed. That is BIG btw.

I agree...the slogan for 2012 should be, 'Well It Would Have Been Worse."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Obama is not god. never will be. never professed to be.
presidents can't create jobs. they can offer plans. congress has complete control over the spending of any money.

it would have been worse under mccain

and it will be even worse under any of the other offerings

vision is a good thing for a president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. And Eric Cantor is doing everything in his power to make Obama
fail, why don't people point that out more!?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Obama could have fought the Repubs for 3 years, not just with campaign rhetoic during an election!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
32. ROFL ... "Obams is not god" !! -- More accurately Obama is no FDR -- !!
Edited on Thu Oct-06-11 12:24 PM by defendandprotect
Sadly, more like Hoover --

Obama is ignoring the will of the people --

We need new candidates who aren't pre-owned and pre-bribed by corporate money!!


Kinda big jump from chess game to "god" -- :eyes:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. If I really thought Obama had a vision
Edited on Tue Oct-04-11 11:47 PM by XemaSab
then I would be more supportive.

I mean, FDR had a vision, and it was a vision that took a lot of time to achieve.

I haven't seen Obama working towards an eventual end. It seems to me like all the initiatives that he has pushed have been piecemeal, with no grand vision in sight.

Take the environment, for example. He's kinda sorta said that he's in favor of renewables, and he's thrown a few bones in that direction, but he doesn't seem worried at all about wilderness, national forests, national parks, the arctic slope, the oceans, or any other form of open space, while out the back door he's giving out freebies to the oil and gas industries.

All this leads me to conclude that he doesn't have any sort of big plan as far as the environment goes.

I am forced to conclude the same things about war, civil liberties, jobs, labor, education, and a host of other issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. Obama had a vision ... "preserve the private health care system" .....
and then Rahm Emmanuel bragged about how grateful business should be to

Obama -- especially for that !!

Rahm .... crowing about preserving "private health care industry" ... business s/b grateful!

In a Thursday interview, White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel arguethat rather than recoiling against Obama, business leaders should be grateful for his support on at least a half-dozen counts: his advocacy of greater international trade and education reform open markets despite union skepticism; his rescue of the automobile industry; the fact that the

overhaul of health care preserved the private delivery system;

the fact that billions in the stimulus package benefited business with lucrative new contracts, and that financial regulation reform will take away the uncertainty that existed with a broken, pre-crash regulatory apparatus.



http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=B2F85DDF-18FE-70B2-A835FE1E7FA8D74C


If that doesn't make you sick to your stomach, nothing will!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. I wish congress would not automatically block everything. eojm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It makes me laugh to think of what kind of posts would be made
had he said we are better off than we were before he was elected. Doesn't matter what this man says or does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Obama had the opportunity to become a liberal President and he blew it.

Of course, many would say that was never Obama's intention or ideology and that Obama was more like a centrist "blue dog" Chicago machine candidate who was in the pocket of Wall Street/La Salle Street and big business from day one.

Do you think that progressives/liberals didn't pay attention to Obama's record/statements and tried to turn him into another FDR, something he obviously isn't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Funny how you get to define what is democratic, what is progressive, etc.
At this point, you have so convinced yourself that Obama intends to harm you and all on the left, that you would find fault with absolutely anything this man does. Whether progressive or not.

The media has done a hell of job. Everybody convinced that Obama hasn't done anything, and what little he's done has caused more harm than good. Utter failure as a president, a waste. Polls polls polls.

Go ahead and have at it. Meanwhile, he's going to win a second term, and press on, people with your opinion notwithstanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Obama defined those terms during his campaign. That's why he won n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. Funny, and utterly ironic. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I know. It gets old. I didn't mean to sound that way if I did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'm glad he is finally being honest with himself and the American people.
Edited on Tue Oct-04-11 04:20 PM by Tatiana
We're worse off and that's clear. The people "occupying" America are proof of that. The talk of recovery always baffled me and, to be honest, irritated me a great deal.

The 99%ers are not recovering. They are sinking further into debt with no jobs and no way to lift themselves out of their personal financial crises.

Now that Obama has admitted the problem, maybe he will also propose some real solutions. Direct employment of the unemployed (if only temporarily) to help repair our infrastructure would be a start. The current jobs bill is woefully short of what this country needs to get back on its feet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. You can keep hoping, but when was last time you heard Obama mention the homeless?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. President Obama is in principal opposed to the direct gov't employment of the jobless such as WPA.

He's made that perfectly clear and the proposed "jobs bill" will only create a few hundred thousand new jobs according to most economists and hardly impact the unemployment rate.

Of course, even this weak bill will not pass this Congress. Senator Reid isn't pushing it and some Democratic Senators will vote against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Well it's time for him to eat his peas and set his preference aside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sad sally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. If calling himself the underdog was meant to get voters excited, then
I'm confused.

How can an incumbent President, with over a year until the elections, with a campaign cash drawer that is reported to be at $1 Billion dollars and no selected opponent say he's the one who has such little status in the political world that at this particular time that he expects to lose? Makes no sense...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. An appeal to voters who like backing the "underdog"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. For a sitting president to call himself the underdog makes him look like a wimp
People root for the underdog; people don't root for the dog who goes out there with his tail between his legs and who rolls over at the first sign of a fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. Agree --- !! Calling for the pity vote --- !!
Hi -- "I'm not as bad as the other guy, but I've alienated my base -- "


By the way, Jonathan Cowan -- Pres. THIRD WAY which now controls the Dem Party

said on C-span the other day that their positions is that "the base shoudl be ignored" --

and that populist discussions/ddebate by candidates is the equal of Karl Rove extremist

propaganda -- !!


:nuke:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
21. I think millions are worse off, but collectively we're all better off...because
we were on the brink of a Great Depression, and we no longer are. If you think 9% unemployment is bad, we could've gone into 25% unemployment territory. That's not going to happen. So in that sense, we're all better off.

But our individual situations...well, for half of us...is worse.

He shouldn't have said that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. It appears we may now be on the brink, in 2011, of a new Great Depression.
Edited on Wed Oct-05-11 01:22 PM by Better Believe It
This is certainly unlike any post World War II recession.

It's longer, deeper and threatens to escalate into a modern day full scale economic depression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. This meltdown has never been a recession --- it's been a depression to a deep recession, imo ....
In fact, Obama called it a "Depression" in a yahoo article in August of last year --

and it was quickly scrubbed and replaced with "recession."

Many members of Congress came close to saying "depression" -- and settled on

"The Great Recession" --- !!! I'll say!!!


:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. ROFL -- We've been in a depression for more than a year -- maybe longer -- !!!
We have more than 16% unemployment -- 25 million unemployed when you count those

no longer eligible for unemployment benefits -- and/or working part times jobs when

they need and want full time jobs.

It could always be worse -- but we elected Obama to make things better -- !!

Not only has he not responded to what needed to be done he is consciously ignoring

the will of the people on every issue --


What would be better is a liberal in the White House -- let's work on that!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
30. As if we didn't already know that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC