|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 12:30 AM Original message |
Why aren't there any anti-Obama signs at the OWS protests? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
murielm99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 12:33 AM Response to Original message |
1. Because he isn't Wall Street? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 12:36 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Many of Obama's Wall Street occupiers (appointments) are the reason for the problems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 12:01 PM Response to Reply #1 |
46. Obama has a Wall Street team ... which has worked well FOR Wall Street -- !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uponit7771 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
63. Obama is secretly trading dirivatives dammit!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HighContext (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:07 PM Response to Reply #1 |
65. Obama = a Street. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
2. Give it time, I'm sure the Ron Paul people there will bring some some. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 12:38 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. So they don't understand anything about the Obama Admin's economic appointments? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:17 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Right, except of course, they're not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:39 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Geithner earned millions of $$$$ from Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, and other Wall St |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:54 AM Response to Reply #11 |
16. You know that link doesn't back up your assertion, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 02:13 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. In what universe is the NY Fed President not a Wall Street insider? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 02:31 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Again: Geithner never worked at a Wall Street investment bank. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 02:24 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Bloomberg was a Dem, then a Repub and now who knows? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 02:37 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Make no mistake, Bloomberg is a Republican. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 10:43 AM Response to Reply #22 |
34. Not really! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 12:44 PM Response to Reply #34 |
59. Yes, really. One article doesn't overcome all the things I listed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 10:44 AM Response to Reply #22 |
35. Bloomberg Markets magazine dropped a bombshell with 14-page investigation of Koch Ind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HighContext (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:12 PM Response to Reply #11 |
67. Obama 'earned' $900k+ from Goldman Sacs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 03:51 AM Response to Reply #8 |
25. You must be kidding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 06:51 PM Response to Reply #2 |
109. +1 billion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 12:38 AM Response to Original message |
5. Deleted message |
Amonester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 12:58 AM Response to Original message |
6. Obama and politicians in general need money for campaigning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:41 AM Response to Reply #6 |
12. They don't give $millions to politicians just cuz they like 'em. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:46 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Hush money. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:52 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Legislation & influence. You can buy a lot of that with the right $$$. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 12:05 PM Response to Reply #6 |
48. Think it's time for Dems to either STOP SELLING themselves or move aside ... !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
willyr9 (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:08 AM Response to Original message |
7. Why No Anti-Obama signs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:36 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. He didn't do anything like that in Chicago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Itchinjim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 02:05 AM Response to Reply #10 |
17. 231... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:26 AM Response to Original message |
9. Because the real problems are way beyond Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:41 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Truer words were never said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deutsey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 05:48 AM Response to Reply #9 |
31. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 10:24 AM Response to Reply #9 |
33. I don't disagree with you, But since when did protesters become so enlightened? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 11:24 AM Response to Reply #33 |
41. This group (at least the NYC group) are highly disciplined, tech savvy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 11:21 AM Response to Reply #9 |
40. Ding, Ding, Ding! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Itchinjim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 02:06 AM Response to Original message |
18. 232... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
murielm99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 02:47 AM Response to Reply #18 |
23. What are you counting? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 05:03 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. I think that's a marker of some kind, not a count. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 05:17 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. But it's a consecutive count . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 06:06 AM Response to Reply #28 |
32. hmmm... perhaps, however |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gold Metal Flake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 12:16 PM Response to Reply #28 |
52. Do a search and you will see that is exactly what it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:59 PM Response to Reply #52 |
87. Isn't that kind of like borderline stalking? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gold Metal Flake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 02:23 PM Response to Reply #87 |
93. I think it will be useful for a mass call-out due any day now. Markers, in a way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:13 PM Response to Reply #18 |
69. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 03:48 AM Response to Original message |
24. They have a larger goal.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 05:02 AM Response to Original message |
26. because it isn't about Obama, directly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 05:19 AM Response to Original message |
29. Likely because they recognize the same things many of us do . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eilen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 05:38 AM Response to Original message |
30. Because this isn't an electoral campaign rally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
36. Well maybe you should make a sign and go to NY and then there will be one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
37. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
38. he has rendered himself irrelevant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 11:33 AM Response to Reply #38 |
42. That would certainly be unprecedented |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-11 12:06 AM Response to Reply #42 |
115. in the context of this protest he has waited so long to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deaniac21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
39. The same reason that war protests stopped. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 11:38 AM Response to Reply #39 |
43. The war protests stopped when Bush/Cheney and the GOP got replaced n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deaniac21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 11:43 AM Response to Reply #43 |
44. The wars sure didn't. We even added another one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 12:06 PM Response to Reply #39 |
49. 80% of the public want an end to the wars -- and think 2010 was also about that and Obama ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 12:40 PM Response to Reply #39 |
56. I would say that the war protests stopped because they didn't work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
45. No DU'ers there? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 12:38 PM Response to Reply #45 |
55. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 06:55 PM Response to Reply #45 |
110. Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
47. Good question .... the fight is against the RW corporatists/fascists --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shagbark Hickory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
50. +! I've been wondering why there doesn't appear to be any RWers there. Aren't they the ones that are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 12:14 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. Well, if this is 'beyond politics' maybe the RWers are there in solidarity? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shagbark Hickory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 12:22 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Or at least it's an excuse to go hold up signs with racist messages on them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 12:50 PM Response to Reply #50 |
61. I think the Ron Paul libertarian factions count as RW, but they aren't traditional RWers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:15 PM Response to Reply #61 |
70. Ron Paul supports less regulation and a "Free Market" economy. They shouldn't be at these Protests. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 04:13 PM Response to Reply #70 |
99. The line I usually get when I ask them is something like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
54. The President really isn't all that important. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 12:40 PM Response to Reply #54 |
57. How quickly things have changed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 12:42 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. You're telling me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 12:45 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. Only the bitter few who believe in magic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 12:57 PM Response to Reply #60 |
62. I'm pretty sure you're wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:06 PM Response to Reply #62 |
64. You need to understand how this government works. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:11 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. Exactly my point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:27 PM Response to Reply #66 |
72. Electoral Politics are not a waste of energy..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:33 PM Response to Reply #72 |
73. At least half the eligible voters in this country clearly agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:41 PM Response to Reply #73 |
76. Why would the Right be at these protests? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:47 PM Response to Reply #76 |
80. Plenty of people on the 'right' protested the bank bailouts in 2008-9 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:53 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. No, people on the Right DID NOT protest the Bank Bailouts.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:55 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. Uh, yes they did. This was before the dumb Tea Party media creation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:59 PM Response to Reply #83 |
86. No, they didn't....That was not the Right protesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 02:03 PM Response to Reply #86 |
90. Aren't people protesting to get Wall Street out of the gvt? How is that not political? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 02:15 PM Response to Reply #90 |
92. You are the one sniffing for Anti-Obama signs, not me..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 04:21 PM Response to Reply #92 |
101. And I can't tell you relieved I am not to find any. This truly reflects his high approval ratings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 02:41 PM Response to Reply #82 |
95. They did actually. The anger from bank bailouts on the right was the nucleus around which the tea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 02:57 PM Response to Reply #95 |
96. No, you are incorrect...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 04:08 PM Response to Reply #96 |
97. It's difficult to find articles that directly reference bipartisan anger in that timeframe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 04:17 PM Response to Reply #97 |
100. "I can't really prove it....." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 04:31 PM Response to Reply #100 |
102. There's a misunderstanding here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 04:46 PM Response to Reply #102 |
103. You stated.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 05:11 PM Response to Reply #103 |
105. That statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 06:04 PM Response to Reply #105 |
106. I disagree..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 06:15 PM Response to Reply #106 |
107. Fair enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 02:02 PM Response to Reply #66 |
88. The problem is the lack of progressives in Congress. Many Ds are really Rs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 08:39 PM Response to Reply #60 |
111. ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
68. Liberals still see President Obama as less scary than myriad Opposers - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
71. I'd pony up for a Geitner Must Go! sign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
74. I saw an anti-Obama sign being carried by a protester |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:38 PM Response to Reply #74 |
75. Was that on the tv, internet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:42 PM Response to Reply #75 |
77. I saw Ron Paul 2012 signs as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:43 PM Response to Reply #75 |
78. on the internet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 02:02 PM Response to Reply #78 |
89. Cartwheels! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EmeraldCityGrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
79. This protest isn't about individual politics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:49 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. A very interesting point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:56 PM Response to Reply #81 |
84. those be the ones that didn't hear the President say, and many times... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 01:57 PM Response to Reply #79 |
85. Obama has already changed the status quo in many ways..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
91. Because it is not about partisan politics, it is about a broken system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
94. Because when it comes to taking care of the country Obama has made himself irrelevant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Puregonzo1188 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
98. I saw an Obama is a War Criminal sign in one of the pics. Thought to be fair the protestors aren't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KurtNYC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
104. OWS is about a process; participatory democracy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
108. Obama isn't the issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
112. Because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
113. This protest is directed at those that control the government. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-03-11 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
114. Because the corrupt system is a whole lot bigger than Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC