I'm from Massachusetts and continue to support Bob Massie, Progressive Democrat and lifelong activist, for US Senate. Massie can boast a string of accomplishments, most notably the expansion of national organization CERES, a large coalition of non-profits and businesses that works to promote environmentally sustainable practices. Massie co-founded the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), a separate organization that is active internationally with the goal of improving corporate behavior. GRI initially targeted environmental issues and has expanded its sustainability framework to include human rights, gender, and community impact. GRI has proved to be more effective in modifying corporate behavior than regulations alone.
Earlier in his career, Bob wrote an internationally-acclaimed book about the transition of South Africa out of apartheid and was one of the international observers of its first post-apartheid election. He recently took a leadership role against proposals to allow slot machines in Massachusetts. Bob Massie is an ordained Episcopal priest with a doctorate in Business Administration from Harvard.
You can learn more about Bob Massie and his campaign at
http://www.bobmassie.orgWatch his MA state convention speech here:
http://www.bobmassie.org/video/new-way-forward-2011-convention-speechFor the record, there are additional Democrats running for this seat. Each candidate would describe him/herself as progressive. They are all good, competent, committed people. Their names in alphabetical order are Tom Conroy, Marisa DeFranco, Alan Khazei, Jim King, and Herb Robinson.
Elizabeth Warren is a good, competent person who would be a good senator. I support Bob Massie because I believe that he would be an extraordinary senator. While expert in his understanding of business, Massie is unusual in his ability to channel the efforts of other experts to produce results.
When national progressive organizations fail to inform their members of all the choices and endorse before even one debate has been held, they are doing a disservice to Massachusetts residents. It is telling that some of these] organizations have failed to even mention any candidates other than Elizabeth Warren. To read their mailings, you would assume that the primary was uncontested. We Massachusetts residents deserve better. Our choices in the primary should not be prematurely determined by national organizations.