|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
quinnox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 03:17 PM Original message |
I find any sympathy for al-Awlaki to be misplaced |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
1. How about sympathy for our late Constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 03:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. You know that he repeatedly, publicly, declared his association with terrorist attacks, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 03:41 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. So that's now a capital offense? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 03:44 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. A violent fugitive resisting arrest is likely to end up dead, either here or across the world. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 03:50 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. So, driving in Yemen is now resisting arrest? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 07:43 PM Response to Reply #18 |
108. Being a violent fugitive from justice, actively involved in multiple murders and attempted murders.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cowpunk (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 11:56 AM Response to Reply #108 |
132. What "justice" was he a fugitive from? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:37 PM Response to Reply #15 |
36. Except he was not violent. He was here preaching in the US |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:55 PM Response to Reply #36 |
48. He left the US in 2002. What are you talking about? He's been in Yemen since 2004. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 06:18 PM Response to Reply #36 |
89. He wasn't killed for preaching non-violently. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wellst0nev0ter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 07:30 AM Response to Reply #89 |
122. Due Process Just Like Jose Padilla Received |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 07:46 PM Response to Reply #36 |
109. Again, you're repeating things which are completely false and made up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 06:16 PM Response to Reply #9 |
88. If he wanted due process, he should have surrendered and turned himself in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 03:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
21. You do get the point of this, don't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:06 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. As long as it was sufficiently inconvenient to follow our laws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:07 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Try reading the whole post then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:20 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. Right; we're "sending a message" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 06:19 PM Response to Reply #24 |
90. How do you give due process to someone who is waging war on you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:55 PM Response to Reply #21 |
47. Anyone who is remotely familiar with the history of our involvement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:13 PM Response to Reply #47 |
54. I didn't say I liked it, I just said I got the point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:18 PM Response to Reply #54 |
62. You have evaded the fundamental question: if it's not OK for other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:30 PM Response to Reply #62 |
70. So, Einstein, what would you do about him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 01:00 AM Response to Reply #70 |
112. Tut-tut. You realpolitikers always get so snarky when presented |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:42 PM Response to Reply #1 |
41. I think he terminated his citizenship when he began waging an offshore war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellisonz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
68. I think the Constitution is pretty clear about this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RetroLounge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 12:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
135. Just a piece of paper. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. al-Awlaki is irrelevant to objections about his killing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 03:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Due process doesn't protect a fugitive resisting arrest from getting killed by the cops. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 03:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. If he was on U.S. soil that would be one thing, but he was involved in planning and implementing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:01 PM Response to Reply #10 |
23. Do you recognize the circular reasoning you are employing here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 07:50 AM Response to Reply #23 |
124. Federal statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1481, identifies 7 categories to lose your citizenship |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 06:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
86. He forfeited due process. All he had to do was surrender and turn himself in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fool Count (878 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 07:19 AM Response to Reply #86 |
121. That's a load of crap. His surrender would have earned him only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harmony Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
3. What about our justice system? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Puregonzo1188 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
4. Do you understand the difference between "sympathy" for al-Awlaki and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quinnox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 03:40 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. yes, but I'm not going to get too worked up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AverageJoe90 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 03:44 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 03:54 PM Response to Reply #7 |
22. Perhaps folks will say that about you some day: He was just an "isolated case". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quinnox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:22 PM Response to Reply #22 |
33. wtf |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:52 PM Response to Reply #33 |
44. Al Queda today, some other group in the future. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hydra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 11:04 AM Response to Reply #33 |
129. You're posting on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:12 PM Response to Reply #7 |
28. Not all that isolated. He wasn't the only one killed in the attack. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sad sally (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:39 PM Response to Reply #28 |
39. Once again, the US has said f___you to international laws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:14 PM Response to Reply #39 |
55. The U.S. is now truly an 'outlaw' nation. Bush and Obama between |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:45 PM Response to Reply #4 |
43. You're assuming he's still an American citizen. I say that he renounced |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:36 PM Response to Reply #43 |
74. Where is this clause? Hell, where is the proof he was waging war? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 07:53 AM Response to Reply #43 |
125. U.S.C. 1481 He more than satisfied the requirements |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
provis99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
5. should Obama assassinate Deryl Dedmon, too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Autumn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 03:46 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. If he chooses to, I think they claim the right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
provis99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 03:50 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. yes, you have heard of Deryl Dedmon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Autumn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 03:53 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. you are right, I recognize it now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
11. I have as much sympathy for al-Awlaki as I did for Timothy McVeigh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amonester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 06:34 PM Response to Reply #11 |
97. Yeah, but after he destroyed how many babies again?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
12. No one's crying any tears for al-Awlaki |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cali_Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
13. Nobody is sympathizing with him specifically |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saras (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #13 |
29. You're right. The whole "sympathy" thing is an argument in bad faith |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:02 PM Response to Reply #13 |
51. I want 'due process' for everyone, not just American citizens. Due process |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
19. What upsets me is that this guy is considered more important than our constitution being followed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
26. This isn't about sympathy, this is about due process and upholding our Constitutional rights, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
27. Who has sympathy for him here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngkorWot (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
30. It's not really sympathy for Al Qaeda. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proles (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
32. I agree. I find it laughable that so many people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dtexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
34. I don't think it's a matter of sympathy for AaA, rather concern for how it was done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
markpkessinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:33 PM Response to Original message |
35. I don't think what you're seeing here is sympathy for al-Awlaki ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:52 PM Response to Reply #35 |
45. Your critique is fundamentally flawed because you aren't analyzing the statute that gives Obama the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
markpkessinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:21 PM Response to Reply #45 |
64. Statutes cannot trump the Constitution n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellisonz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:30 PM Response to Reply #64 |
69. Except when the Constitution authorizes Congress to make statutes.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
markpkessinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:44 PM Response to Reply #69 |
77. We aren't discussing the definition of treason... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellisonz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:51 PM Response to Reply #77 |
80. They don't need to - Authorization of Military Force has been granted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
37. Would you please point out some threads ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
38. Then you don't "get it". nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
40. It's not a question of sympathy for an individual. It's whether we are a nation of laws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:44 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. He revoked his own citizenship when he began waging war from another country. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:18 PM Response to Reply #42 |
61. Where exactly in our Constitution does it say this? (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:25 PM Response to Reply #61 |
65. The Constitution doesn't have a clause for every particular contingency. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:35 PM Response to Reply #65 |
73. No, but it does have rather-explicit language about... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:48 PM Response to Reply #73 |
78. What state did anything to him? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 07:30 PM Response to Reply #78 |
103. Are you being deliberately obtuse? "The state" in this case refers to the political... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellisonz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:35 PM Response to Reply #61 |
72. Article III, Section 3. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:36 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. So what court provided this conviction? What defense was the defendant afforded(NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellisonz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:44 PM Response to Reply #75 |
76. Doesn't have too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:49 PM Response to Reply #75 |
79. Where does it say anything about a court? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 07:13 PM Response to Reply #42 |
102. Sure. And maybe the next president can up it a notch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neverforget (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 12:20 PM Response to Reply #102 |
134. That and a Democrat did this so it's all cool. If a Republican had done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:53 PM Response to Reply #40 |
46. We passed a law allowing the President to do this. It's too bad Bush didn't do it to OBL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:15 PM Response to Reply #46 |
57. Really? Because that argument held no sway with Liberals in the 1950's South, did it now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hydra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 11:12 AM Response to Reply #46 |
130. Bush cared about stopping OBL? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 04:58 PM Response to Reply #40 |
49. It's within the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:01 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. ACLU and the Center for Constitutional Rights disagree with you and with Obama. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:06 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. They can be wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:26 PM Response to Reply #50 |
66. Until the Supreme Court disagrees, it doesn't matter who else does. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellisonz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:52 PM Response to Reply #66 |
81. FTW. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 07:56 AM Response to Reply #50 |
126. Title1481 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:11 PM Response to Reply #49 |
53. So I take it you wouldn't have a problem if the Iraqis sent a hit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:28 PM Response to Reply #53 |
67. No one is saying that his host country might not object. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 06:09 PM Response to Reply #53 |
85. that would be war, pretty much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 01:02 AM Response to Reply #85 |
113. If who did what where? Sorry, not understanding your question so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:17 PM Response to Reply #49 |
59. Did you like "Jim Crow" laws, too? Now, now; too late for you to make a "distinction." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 06:07 PM Response to Reply #59 |
83. Well that was uncalled for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:20 PM Response to Reply #49 |
63. *ALL* of our law is subservient to our Constitution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 06:08 PM Response to Reply #63 |
84. It is not extrajudicial assassination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 06:15 PM Response to Reply #63 |
87. If he had surrendered and turned himself in, he would have gotten due process. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 07:32 PM Response to Reply #87 |
104. There's nothing in the Constitution about a need to turn yourself in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
56. "Sympathy" is not the issue. Lady Justice demands fairness to all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
58. Bottom line, there is no such thing as due process for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:18 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. No; American citizens are in the very clear zone called "American citizen." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:30 PM Response to Reply #60 |
71. Some are it seems. Like GWB and Dick Cheney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 05:52 PM Response to Reply #60 |
82. Not when they renounce their citizenship. By word or by deed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harmony Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 06:20 PM Response to Reply #82 |
92. If the United States had overwhelming evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
markpkessinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 06:45 PM Response to Reply #82 |
98. It still requires a conviction in court of the crime of treason . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 06:55 PM Response to Reply #98 |
101. If he wanted due process, he could have gotten it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 06:21 PM Response to Reply #60 |
93. FAIL for valuing American citizens over other in questions of human rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harmony Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 06:26 PM Response to Reply #93 |
95. OBL should have been tried as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 06:20 PM Response to Reply #58 |
91. Yes, unfortunately that is not clear any more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angry Dragon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 06:23 PM Response to Original message |
94. So it is okay with you to kill Americans that have not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Throd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 06:32 PM Response to Reply #94 |
96. Doing what he did? Sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angry Dragon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 07:41 PM Response to Reply #96 |
106. I saw no proof, I saw no trial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
99. We agree on this. Not on a lot of other things, but on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
100. How do you know he was what was claimed? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 07:33 PM Response to Original message |
105. agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 07:43 PM Response to Original message |
107. rather than sympathy for al-Alwaki, I have RESPECT for the Constitution... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadMaddie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
110. He denounced his citizenship that was his decision |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YellowCosmicSun (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-11 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
111. Some dislike Obama so much, they will side with a terrorist. That's a fucking shame. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 02:03 AM Response to Reply #111 |
116. I dislike attacks on our constitution, no matter who commits them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AverageJoe90 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 02:07 AM Response to Reply #111 |
118. I disagree with that quite strongly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSlayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 01:04 AM Response to Original message |
114. Exactly. Fuck that guy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AverageJoe90 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 02:11 AM Response to Reply #114 |
119. I'm kinda glad they're gone, too, but........... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 07:57 AM Response to Reply #119 |
127. bush and company were incompetent. Not heeding the warnings of 9/11 were an example of that /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AverageJoe90 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 06:17 PM Response to Reply #127 |
137. Exactly so! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoeyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 01:58 AM Response to Original message |
115. Yep, there it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 02:05 AM Response to Reply #115 |
117. The other day, I thought Turley was over the top |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 03:51 AM Response to Original message |
120. It has fuck-all to do with what he is. It is about who WE are n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 07:33 AM Response to Original message |
123. Because it isn't sympathy for al-Awlaki, nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinnie From Indy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 07:59 AM Response to Original message |
128. I have no sympathy for al-Alawki. I have a great deal of sympathy for the rule of law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cowpunk (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
131. This OP is disgraceful. Shame on you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
133. Not being a fan of extra-judicial assassinations does not mean you sympathize with the victim. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
booley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-01-11 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
136. What sympathy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC