Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

One Half of One Percent Tax on Financial Transactions Will Raise $1 Trillion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
sfpcjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 02:28 PM
Original message
One Half of One Percent Tax on Financial Transactions Will Raise $1 Trillion
Edited on Fri Sep-30-11 02:30 PM by sfpcjock
...and tax the speculation that is raising food prices.

http://www.southernstudies.org/2011/08/nurses-rally-to-heal-america-with-wall-street-tax.html"> Nurses rally to heal America with Wall Street tax - The Institute for Southern Studies
Nurses will gather across the U.S. to urge Congress to tax financial transactions and use the revenue to fund social programs desperately needed amid the ongoing economic crisis.
...
Earlier this month, NNU sent a letter to all 535 members of the House and Senate asking them to support a tax on trading of stocks, bonds, derivatives, currencies, credit default swaps and futures -- the sort of financial speculation behind the 2008 economic meltdown and resulting recession.

"America's nurses see every day the broad declines in health and living standards that are a direct result of patients and families struggling with lack of jobs, un-payable medical bills, hunger and homelessness," said NNU Co-president Karen Higgins, a registered nurse. "We know where to find the resources to bring them hope and real solutions."
...


www.SouthernStudies.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. speculators are only for taking, not giving back nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfpcjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. The speculators took $9 Trillion in addition to the TARP...
...we now know. They used to pay off the TARP quickly and start paying hundreds of millions of dollars in "bonuses" to the criminals who crashed the world economy (and ours). They also used the "funny money" to speculate on commodity prices which they do because they put real estate into the toilet, and the stock market is more or less flat-lined, too.


That is why a small fee on this speculation is wise and needed to be fair to us, the 99%, and to fix state budgets, and other needy programs that make life go on and help us to recover much more quickly than we would without it.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. YES YES YES YES and also raise the cap on SS contributions
no more financial problems and single payer affordable!

BVut they won't do it, and the fact that they won't indicates just whose side they are on. And it's not us. EVEN FOR ONE HALF OF ONE PERCENT--IT'S STILL TOO MUCH FOR THE RICH!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. You will also have to raise their SS payout. Only fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. absolutely, checks should double; it's the best stimulus dollar for dollar
or nearly so
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Nikon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. Even if you did it wouldn't go up proportionately
The formula for SS benefit calculation isn't linear between high and low income earners. So effectively higher income earners already receive less of a benefit relative to what they are putting in.

If you no longer have a cap, it only makes sense to insert more bend points and continue reducing the payout formula for higher income earners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I agree, and it still helps SS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Make it a full percent and then double that. Raise $4T, use the money to put everyone back to work.
Edited on Fri Sep-30-11 02:38 PM by leveymg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfpcjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
27. Definitely consider! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnd83 Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Put a 0.5% tax on micro-trading
See how long that stays profitable. Micro trading completely violates the spirit of what the stock exchange is supposed to be used for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfpcjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
28. This is the one that I thought of, too!
Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes, please.
best idea since ice cream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyPragmatist Donating Member (556 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Where did you get $1 trillion, the article says $175 billion
And the cost would just be passed on to consumers anyways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Uhm... how??!!
Taxing investment is not increasing the cost of production, it is an attempt to gamble on the relative value of a company and skim the cream off of the company in the form of profits. This kind of tax reduces short term investments that increase the requirement for maximization of quarterly return on rate of investment.

Short term investment of this nature is actually anti-investment or descructive investment because it does not actually put resources in the hands of the company to increase or expand business but rather just makes a demand to pull resources out of the company.

By making micro investing or short term investing less profitable it encourages more stable growth and more rational corporate policy. The means by which one increases profitability massively or unsustainably usually takes the form of cutting service, price gouging, or massive cuts in "flexible" expenses such as labor.

The "costs" already ARE on all of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfpcjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
29. What I think, too. This is the standard talking point of the right
...that no matter how unregulated and abusive the actions of multinational corps and the six banks, "it could be worse", so don't give them a bad day. Oh, please!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. Except most transaction are not about "investment" in a company, they are bets,
like a roll of the dice or a spin of the roulette wheel.

Did you know that the average share of stock is held for a mere 22 seconds before it's sold again?

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/michael-hudson-average-stock-held-22-seconds-and-average-foreign-currency-position-held-30-s
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
32. Geez, Republican talking points.
We love Republican talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
35. All costs get passed on
it is an economic cycle. Tax rates are profoundly not relevant, as long as every dollar is returned in spending. As it is, roughly $2 is returned in spending for each $1 taken in taxes. The problem arises as you approach budget balance, because instead of $2 coming back, it gets closer to only $1 dollar coming back.

Where this proposal would work is that it would all but eliminate high frequency cheap day trading, where one can "make money" from small shifts in asset valuation. If the tax was imposed, any shift less than 0.5 percent is a money loser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think we need to make speculation trading illegal.
The simple fact is that people like the scumfuck Koch Bros. are profiting big time from this crap and dragging the economy down with it. This crap must stop!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnd83 Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Speculation in commodities used to be illegal
And then we had the deregulation craze. And now gas is ~$4 a gallon. Coincidence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hifiguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Not at all.
Matt Taibbi devotes an entire chapter of "Griftopia" to this phenomenon.

Fuck the greedheads with a hot iron poker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnd83 Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I haven't heard of that book
I'll have to check it out. I wonder how Matt Taibbi wound up writing for Rolling Stone. He is one of the best liberal/progressive writers out there right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. A hot iron poker!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. If you can't take delivery, you can't buy
futures in oil. That'd be my rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Not a bad rule at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. I'm all for your new rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfpcjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
40. This is good.
Stop the oil speculation. Before the Iraq war gas was $1.50 ($1.25 before 9/11). After $4.00. Most of that is speculation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. Seems reasonable enough, unless you belong to the %1.
:shrug: Why are the ultra rich so damn greedy? They do not exist in a vacuum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
18. Why can't we do this?
We can't do this because TPTB are dead set on cutting medicare, medicaid and privatizing social security. They rule the nation so it will be done. Unless 300,000 protesters show up on Wall Street and/or Washington. That might get some attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
21. A trillion here, a trillion there...
...pretty soon it adds up to real money!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. Five cent per share tax on stock held for less than an hour...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthwillout777 Donating Member (65 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
25. great...then let's make it 5%
How much are we in debt again?

They took the money and hid it, time for them to give it back. Turns out it is not so great for the overall economy when the hoarders get hold of the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
30. I don't think that 1/2% would be enough incentive to stop the profiteering?
I think maybe 4% or 5% might give them pause about trying to make a 1% or 2% profit in only one day. That would help the market, in my opinion. If it raised $8 or $10 trillion dollars in taxes, so much the better. They owe us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
31. A younger, less corrupted Obama used to talk about a similar measure
I think the idea he was considering was about a quarter of one percent per transaction.

In any event, it should be taken seriously and acted upon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
33. Still not enough... how about an automatic 50% on banker commissions...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
34. EU to explore ways to introduce financial transaction tax at global level
http://nvonews.com/2011/09/28/eu-to-explore-ways-to-introduce-financial-transaction-tax-at-global-level/

The European Commission presented Wednesday a proposal for a financial transaction tax in the 27 member states of the European Union. The EU’s executive body said in a statement that it will also explore ways to introduce a financial transaction tax at global level and present its proposals to the G20 Summit in November.

The Commission said it decided to introduce a new tax on financial transactions for two reasons. First, to ensure that the financial sector makes a fair contribution at a time of financial crisis in Europe.

The financial sector played a role in the origins of the economic crisis. EU Member States have committed 4.6 trillion euro to bail out the financial sector during the crisis. The financial sector enjoys a tax advantage of approximately 18 billion euro per year because of VAT exemption on financial services.

The second reason is that a coordinated framework at EU level would help to strengthen the EU single market. Today, 10 EU Member States have a form of a financial transaction tax in place. The proposal would harmonise different existing taxes on financial transactions in the EU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
36. And a 2% tax will raise 4 Trillion. I like it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
37. As long as we are clear that it is only STOCK transactions
or other limited classes of transactions.

In other words, the phrase 'financial transactions' is very broad, and could mean things like paycheck deposits and transferring money between savings and checking accounts. Yes I read the article and from the context, that is not what they are talking about. I'm just saying, be sure it is clear what we mean. Otherwise you could end up with another tax that hits working stiffs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. Good distinctions, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-11 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
39. 1T$ = Health care for EVERYONE in the USA.
Since all doctors, nurses and hospitals would be paid, we dump the excess 1.5T$ health care denial through bad insurance practice system and just enjoy paid-for real doctor-patient health care and spend our deductibles on beer and our work places could spend their archaic health care payments on parties. BYOB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC