Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dems to John Boehner: Your Lawyer Is "Unreasonable"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 02:12 PM
Original message
Dems to John Boehner: Your Lawyer Is "Unreasonable"
Democratic lawmakers don't like the "harmful and unreasonable arguments" being used by House speaker John Boehner's lawyer to keep the Defense of Marriage Act on the books.

A contingent from Congress, including all four of the gay members, wrote to Boehner demanding a chance to confront the lawyer with what they say is "discredited" and "biased" research on homosexuality that was used in a legal brief representing Congress in court.

DOMA prevents federal recognition of same-sex marriages and allows states to ignore such unions when performed in other states. Lawyer Paul Clement, hired by Republican leaders in the House of Representatives to defend the law, has argued that it's allowable because gay people are inferior parents, being gay is a choice, and LGBT people aren't regularly victims of discrimination and so they shouldn't be a protected class.

House Republican leadership opted to pay for a legal defense of DOMA after President Obama decided in February that it was an indefensible law because it violates the Constitution. The first firm Boehner hired backed out after it was criticized for siding with DOMA, but Clement decided to leave and take the case with him to Bancroft PLLC.

http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2011/09/26/Dems_to_John_Boehner_Your_Lawyer_Is_Unreasonable/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TriMera Donating Member (885 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Paul Clement has the only job created by
Republicans so far in this Congressional session. I'm sure he is getting paid well to do it, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Actually John Boehner also hired himself a maid on the public dollar.
I shit you not. We're paying to hire him a second maid (he already has one) to clean up after him. He hired her to clean up after events at his residence and he billed it to the government as connected to his official capacities.

That's two jobs the GOP has created...now we just need 25M more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TriMera Donating Member (885 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I stand corrected.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Link for the claim of taxpayers paying for the maid.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I stand corrected on that point...
I pulled the stories and there is no mention of who is paying for the maid. Actually it's a circular reporting mess...a DU post cites a blog that cites another blog that doesn't cite a source...I can't find a solid news source that he even really hired a maid. Oh well. I was going to ask if she was documented...it'd be too like him to hire an undocumented foreign worker to be cheap.

But we're a lack for proof that his maid exists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That is why I asked
when I went searching all that happened was everything went in a circle

Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Their first two arguments (excuses) prove their last argument
is false. "gay people are inferior parents, being gay is a choice, and LGBT people aren't regularly victims of discrimination and so they shouldn't be a protected class."


:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Move for Rule 11 sanctions

That would be a hoot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC