Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Silence From the Court - NYT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-11 01:05 PM
Original message
Silence From the Court - NYT
Another reason the DP violates the 8th Amendment against cruel and unusual punishment.

Silence From the Court
By DAHLIA LITHWICK and LISA T. McELROY - NYT
Published: September 22, 2011

<snip>

ON Wednesday night, Troy Davis was executed for a crime he may or may not have committed. But the real crime on Wednesday night was the action — or really the lack of action, the absolute radio silence — of the United States Supreme Court, which, as the nation watched and waited, did nothing for 203 minutes past the scheduled execution time. Or at least nothing anyone could see.

It is a truism of the American justice system that the Supreme Court operates in secret, unmoved by candlelight vigils and protests, polls and placard-wielding crowds. That is right and proper. It’s the reason the justices are unelected and also the reason they are required to write fully developed opinions and orders. But we must keep in mind that the court knew for several days that the execution was scheduled for Wednesday at 7 p.m. It knew that it would receive a last-minute petition for a stay and that Georgia would not carry out the execution until it spoke. Under those circumstances, for it to consider a matter of life and death, while for over three long hours America and the world are told absolutely nothing, is a violation of that basic bargain. It is a show of power without reason and of authority without accountability.

For 203 minutes on Wednesday night Americans speculated and wondered, worried and guessed, without recourse — waiting for a single sentence from the Supreme Court. While the court considered the petition for far longer than was typical, all while communicating nothing, even Mr. Davis’s own lawyers were unclear as to why the delay had happened, what exactly the Supreme Court was debating, and when the court would decide Mr. Davis’s fate. For 3 hours and 23 minutes the foremost lawyers and pundits in the country tried to guess at what was going on in Washington, while the Supreme Court’s Web site offered no information about the matter. If any other branch of government had exercised such power without explanation, it would have looked like all of democracy had been put on hold.

And then there’s the human dimension. Because while the court went dark for over three hours, a man waited to learn whether he would live or die, as did his family. The family of Mark A. MacPhail Sr., the Savannah police officer whom Mr. Davis was convicted of killing, waited for closure.


<snip>

More: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/23/opinion/supreme-courts-silence-on-execution.html?ref=opinion

:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-11 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. It Was A Show Of Contempt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-11 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Same reason they forced the issue of dates in 2000.
Edited on Fri Sep-23-11 01:24 PM by Rex
Scarface knew they could steal an election for his good friend James Baker III by making sure deadlines were more important then the outcome of a federal election. They use the law to break the spirit of the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riftaxe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-11 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wait, are you saying that the founding fathers
Edited on Fri Sep-23-11 05:16 PM by Riftaxe
ignored the document they just wrote?

Or are you contending that despite the fact that executions in this country go back to 1608, you all of the sudden have a better comprehension of the Bill of Rights then the founders who wrote it?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC