Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On bringing knives to gun fights..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 05:54 AM
Original message
On bringing knives to gun fights..
I have read the screeds about Nader and the 2000 election. I am not fond of him because I believe he is now motivated more by the need to build his own ego than bring about real change.

However, I believe we lost in 2000 because of the penchant of bringing knives to gunfights. When the chips were down and being thrown, we sent Warren Christopher???? to represent Gore while the Rethugs sent James Baker. That was tantamount to sending a plastic picnic knife to do battle with a SAM missle. Baker is and was a person who would cut you in a heartbeat no matter what civilized veneer he had obtained over the years. Underneath it all, he could give Atwater a run for his money.

In the years since 2000, it is apparent that we have Learned very little. The GOPhers do something we consider outrageous and unfair and what is our response? We shriek about ethics and point out what vile people they are. That is all well and good, but at the same time, one would think we woul have learned by now that politics is a blood sport. It isn't for the faint of heart. While taking the high road, we have ignored the inroads the GOP has made scuttling around on their cloven hooves on the low path.

They appeal to people's baser instincts and push toward them using fear and hate. We appeal to ' the better angel of our nature' trying to stop the stampede. Guess what? In the mishegas they create, nobody can hear that argument.

Do I believe we need to be as vile? No. However, I do believe we should be more than ready to fight on that low road by pushing back hard with clear and loud positions. Grayson would do this. Elizabeth Warren has a message that I think is uniquely suited to the high and low roads. She states simply but forcefully a basic message of fairness that can cut through the cant at all levels. Use her message and approach because she has street cred and people can identify with her. They feel the fight that Warren posseses and understand that she will be with them 'until the last dog dies.'

So, the Dems better be developing and using some powerful and direct methods. Screaming about rules and whatever after the fact epecially when you know what is coming is not only stupid but a betrayal of the people you profess to speak for.

Warren may not have a gun, but she is a ninja that should scare the PTB to death. She can show up anywhere and effectively neutralize those on the other side. Forget the equivalent of Seal Team Six on the campaign trail. Warren is just as effective and much more deadly against other beliefs because she has passion and fire as well as first class mind. Her appearance belies her mettle. She is no political naif.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. your article is based on the premise the the dems are an opposition party.
they are not. losing elections really has no adverse consequences for the careerist politicos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I am talking about the
entire Dem party and anybody else opposing the GOPhers. The careerists are bad enough, but the rank and file need to wake up and break ranks and not file in by some predetermined order.

The rank and file are actually those who can spread the message in many places. They are much closer to reality than a lot of people in DC. I think they already know more about the nature of the opposition, but they need to refuse to be lulled by reassurances from anybody that it's ok. They are better off forming tight local and then state groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. as they are reminded often enough on DU, who else they gonna vote for?
the 2 party system is failing. no amount of working inside the system is going to change it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I never said inside the system exclusively.
No matter where they operate from, my point is that they better be aware of who they are fighting and their tactics. If they go outside the system, they will probably face fiercer resistance from their putative allies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Your premise is false: Al Gore did not lose the election in 2000.
The election didn't matter; Bush was appointed President after a coup d'etat by 5 members of the USSC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. He did lose the election but
not in the normal sense. By sending Christopher, he didn't realize how nasty it would or at least that was the appearance. I don't know if a better advocate would have succeeded, but a much harder and different fight could have been put up.

The major problem as I was trying to point out is the continued tactic of ignoring the fact of how nasty the process can be. We know they are up to no good, but who is countering their shenanigans now? After the election is way too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrunkenBoat Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. Baker is a gangster, & his family have been gangster for generations.
Working for the same people, too.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_A._Baker,_Sr.


His two grandfathers were James Addison Baker, (also known as Capt. James A. Baker), a partner in the Baker Botts law firm, and Edgar Odell Lovett, Princeton Mathematics Department chairman who in 1912 became Rice University's first president.

Lovett Baker grew up in Houston's Museum District, just north of the Rice campus, near his cousin James Baker, who was born the same year. Born Sept. 21, 1930, to Adelaide Lovett Baker and Walter Browne Baker, Lovett Baker graduated from Phillips Exeter Academy in Exeter, N.H., in 1948 and earned a bachelor's degree in economics in 1952 from Princeton University in Princeton, N.J.

He served in the U.S. Navy from 1952 to 1954, when he married Joanne Prescott of Cleveland, Ohio.

http://www.chron.com/news/houston-deaths/article/Banker-teacher-Lovett-Baker-dies-at-79-1599241.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. We simply didn't have an answer to Katherine Harris and Jeb Bush being in Florida.
Jeb Bush pushed through the order, and Katherine Harris put it into action: She purged over 50,000 voters from the rolls, and most of them were black people.

The ace in the hole, though, was the Supreme Court intervening before a statewide recount could be done. Had a recount covered the whole state, Gore would have handily won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. They were ready to roll though.
Why do people think the Bushes have set up bases in Texas and Florida? It sure wasn't going to be Wyoming or Rhode Island. They know he electoral system.

Where do you think the Rethugs will concentrate in 2012? It will be in those states that Obama flipped and are still vulnerable. Any state that might be in play with a decent amount of electoral votes will be eyed too. They won't ignore any state. They will cause mischief wherever they can.

Their efforts will not just be on the polls and voters per se. They will look at the entire system from top to bottom to find weaknesses. They have it down to a science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC