|
Edited on Wed Sep-21-11 11:21 PM by Kennah
I wore a suit and tie the first day. Once I saw people for jury duty, I realized I'd overdressed in Seattle. I stepped down to business casual attire after that. I shaved, but kept my mustache and goatee, and also wore my ear ring. Once I ditched the suit, I think I dressed fairly nondescript and blended in pretty well. There were people who were dressed much flashier, or looked more the hippie, or guys with 5 or 6 earrings, or people with facial piercings, or interesting colored hair.
I remember this one other guy in particular from the jury pool, and I think he might have been hitting on me at one point, who was very nicely dressed, clean shaven, and overall very low key and quiet. Listening to him speak, I thought he was very smart, he tried not to say more than he had to say, but it was clear listening to him that he like I was more sympathetic to the rights of people than with hanging someone.
It became clear that the attorneys were going to draw you out to speak, and if you didn't they were going to focus on you and drill into you. There's a balance of saying enough, but not too much, and I suspect I said too much.
Prosecution threw out some hypotheticals at one point about expert testimony, and I answered something to the effect of taking people at their word until I thought I was being lied to or misled. He asked for a number, and I said once is a mistake, twice can happen, but by the time I get lied to three times your credibility is shot. He responded, "So you believe in three strikes and you're out." When he said that, people laughed, and I thought this guy thinks I'm on his side so the prosecution will want me.
Actually, I think the Defense Counsel may have caused the most harm. She asked me several questions that really drew out my perceived sympathies.
The case was pretty rough. Jury pool was for 120 jurors. When they announced 120 jurors, people looked around with a WTF look. One woman asked me why so many, and I said, "I'm guessing it's sexual, it involves kids, and it's bad." I was right on all counts. It was a Sexually Violent Predator civil commitment.
There were a LOT of questions, very personal questions, drilling into sexual abuse that we were given in the juror questionnaire. Having been a victim of sexual abuse as a kid in Boy Scouts, and having a relative who was a victim as well, my brother, I suspect I might have been "Red Flagged" by both the Prosecution and the Defense Counsel from the answers in my questionnaire. Separate and apart from the jury proceeding, that hit me hard like a hammer to the chest; however, it was very cathartic. It had been decades since my abuse and it gave me a chance to be able to be comfortable and, if necessary, to at least acknowledge it in a public forum.
Maybe, when I first spoke, the Defense Counsel zeroed in on me and thought, "This guy is smart, and he'll never make it onto the jury, but I can use him to drum up sympathy."
The thing that I was most concerned about, which I thought would draw fire, was my gun. I have a Concealed Pistol License, and in Washington we can carry to court. They provide a lockbox to secure it, so I did. It was mostly a non-event. They look at your ID and License, a Deputy or Security Officer walks you down the hall to the lockbox room, and you lock up your gun. The Deputy told me, "Be sure to take off your holster. If you walk around the jury room with a holster on, someone is going to freak out." I told him, "No problem. Good advice."
|