|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:09 AM Original message |
Jesus.... I Believe That The Execution Of Troy Davis Is A Political Act, And NOT An Act Of Justice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:11 AM Response to Original message |
1. that is because you don't know the facts of the case... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Parker CA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:14 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. And what exactly are the facts? Why would a request for a polygraph be denied? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:21 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. you can look up the facts for yourself... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:27 AM Response to Reply #7 |
14. And You Would Put Davis To Death When There Is So Much Doubt ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:02 PM Response to Reply #14 |
72. I am gving the link to the Moore ruling--I don't think there's much doubt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:34 PM Response to Reply #72 |
86. So... We're Gonna Kill A Guy Because He Didn't Follow Proper Protocol ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:35 PM Response to Reply #86 |
88. And she seems to have no problem with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 05:00 PM Response to Reply #88 |
144. Actually, I and the other lawyer on the thread are anti-DP. But Troy Davis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 05:03 PM Response to Reply #144 |
145. Sickening. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 05:23 PM Response to Reply #145 |
150. It's easy defending the innocent. Tougher to stand with the guilty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 05:26 PM Response to Reply #150 |
152. Can you point to any evidence that he's guilty? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 05:34 PM Response to Reply #152 |
155. I can lead you to rulings, but I can't make you read them. His guilt doesn't change your stance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 05:40 PM Response to Reply #155 |
156. once more slowly just for you I read it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:59 PM Response to Reply #86 |
103. do you want courts to accept unsworn, uncrossed evidence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:03 PM Response to Reply #103 |
108. No. But I also don't want them to accept testimony that has been contradicted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:58 PM Response to Reply #103 |
143. This Case Makes A Mockery Of "Due Process", Capital Punishment, And OUR ENTIRE JUSTICE SYSTEM !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 05:29 PM Response to Reply #143 |
154. Sadly, Davis had bites at the apple few did. His 2010 hearing was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 05:43 PM Response to Reply #72 |
157. You said "not much doubt" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capitalocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-22-11 09:32 AM Response to Reply #157 |
170. "Not much doubt" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipi_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:34 AM Response to Reply #7 |
22. A polygraph on its own |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:41 AM Response to Reply #7 |
26. So you're fine with a person being sent to death with ZERO physical evidence against them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:43 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. + 1,000,000,000... What You Said !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:43 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. yep...ZERO evidence...that's what they had... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:48 AM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Please provide any physical evidence that you are aware of. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:51 AM Response to Reply #28 |
33. ALL They Had Was Eye-Witness Accounts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:54 AM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Well, they aren't very credible witnesses. We can't trust that they're telling the truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:57 AM Response to Reply #35 |
38. LOL !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:15 PM Response to Reply #33 |
77. No. They had ballistics, which the basis for the current emergency appeal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:24 PM Response to Reply #77 |
80. Ballistics means NOTHING if they can't prove he touched that gun. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:57 PM Response to Reply #80 |
100. Because they match those of the other guy he killed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:02 PM Response to Reply #100 |
105. Troy Davis? You're saying he's been convicted of another homicide? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:06 PM Response to Reply #105 |
111. Excuse me, "shot", not killed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:07 PM Response to Reply #111 |
113. Not Troy Davis. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:21 PM Response to Reply #100 |
119. Nobody questions it my ass. This is part of the same damned case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:44 PM Response to Reply #77 |
94. Crickets again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 10:14 AM Response to Reply #28 |
45. Crickets? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 02:09 PM Response to Reply #28 |
61. So, you're not even going to bother to make shit up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:45 PM Response to Reply #61 |
136. ahhh...your victory is now complete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:46 PM Response to Reply #136 |
137. You seem to be the one who's concerned with winning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 10:09 PM Response to Reply #137 |
164. 'Humani-wutnow?' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-22-11 09:25 AM Response to Reply #164 |
168. I suppose I shouldn't be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:55 PM Response to Reply #136 |
163. It's not about 'victory'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 02:35 PM Response to Reply #28 |
65. Have you changed your mind on this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 11:53 AM Response to Reply #7 |
55. You mean that seven out of nine witnesses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 02:50 PM Response to Reply #55 |
67. google is yours. Can you produce those recantations? His attorneys couldn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 02:59 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. Yes. I can produce a number of them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:10 PM Response to Reply #70 |
74. Those aren't recantations. You know why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:15 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. But why the hell is he being put to death if that's the SOLE reason he was found guilty? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:23 PM Response to Reply #76 |
79. The eyewitness testimony and the ballistics evidence remain legally intact.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:26 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. And ONCE AGAIN, you provide nothing in terms of evidence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:25 PM Response to Reply #81 |
120. I have repeatedly provided the Moore ruling, which states the evidence on which |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:27 PM Response to Reply #120 |
121. Are you freaking kidding me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:38 PM Response to Reply #121 |
129. I am not kidding you. You have the ruling. Tell us what you disagree with. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:41 PM Response to Reply #129 |
133. THERE'S NOTHING TO DISAGREE WITH! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 05:12 PM Response to Reply #133 |
146. Then you agree with Judge Moore that Troy Davis is guilty of murder. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 05:18 PM Response to Reply #146 |
149. Wow You are the opposite of clever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:50 PM Response to Reply #129 |
139. Let me provide your logic here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:29 PM Response to Reply #120 |
122. There's nothing to dispute because the judge cites absolutely nothing of substance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:48 PM Response to Reply #122 |
138. The judge said nothing of substance? Dear me. I thought his analysis of Herrera |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:51 PM Response to Reply #138 |
140. So once again you pass up on the opportunity to provide even a shred of evidence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 05:43 PM Response to Reply #140 |
158. I can lead you to rulings, but I can't make you read them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 05:51 PM Response to Reply #158 |
159. I read the ruling, you haven't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:27 PM Response to Reply #79 |
82. OK. So the ballistics evidence shows that the cop was killed with a .38. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:58 PM Response to Reply #82 |
101. How do you explain his other conviction? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:02 PM Response to Reply #101 |
106. What other conviction? NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:05 PM Response to Reply #106 |
109. For shooting Michael Cooper |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:08 PM Response to Reply #109 |
114. This is part of the same damned case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:40 PM Response to Reply #114 |
132. A lot of things matter to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:43 PM Response to Reply #132 |
135. I, too have consistently opposed the death penalty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 05:27 PM Response to Reply #135 |
153. Because the discussion of Troy Davis' guilt is irrelevant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 06:56 PM Response to Reply #153 |
161. I agree that the death penalty is extremely flawed and can't be fixed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:24 AM Response to Reply #2 |
9. There will be no facts forthcoming. There never are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:26 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. bullshit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:29 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Oh, would that be the judge who says the witnesses aren't credible? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
socialist_n_TN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:57 AM Response to Reply #16 |
37. Hmmm. I wonder when the witnesses weren't credible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 02:53 PM Response to Reply #16 |
68. Judge Moore said the recantations weren't credible because the defense attorneys didn't call the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:58 PM Response to Reply #68 |
102. That still isn't evidence. The poster claims there were things about the trial we didn't know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:31 PM Response to Reply #102 |
123. The first 60 pages of the ruling outline the evidence against him.Rr |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:34 PM Response to Reply #123 |
125. And for some damned reason, you can't even specify what that evidence is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:37 PM Response to Reply #123 |
128. If it outlines the evidence, then why is it so hard for anyone to explain what that evidence is? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:39 PM Response to Reply #128 |
131. Surely providing a link is enough, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ceile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:30 AM Response to Reply #12 |
18. And judges are never wrong... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:31 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Yep. That would be those "facts". n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:31 AM Response to Reply #12 |
21. Wow... Were You At The Reagan Library Recently ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:53 AM Response to Reply #12 |
34. Your position is not rational. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zax2me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:47 PM Response to Reply #2 |
96. Why would it be denied? Please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:57 PM Response to Reply #96 |
142. Because they'd look even fucking worse when he passes it. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:20 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. The facts are irrelevant, an innocent person may be executed as long as due process was followed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:27 AM Response to Reply #6 |
13. and let's also have mindless 'cogs' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ceile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:29 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Yep. We're all a bunch of idiots.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 02:07 PM Response to Reply #17 |
60. That's right. The information is 'out there somewhere'. If we can't find it, that's our problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:22 AM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Yes... Please Fill Us In On "The Facts" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:25 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. ahhh...the wiki-source... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ceile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:28 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Be as condescending as you want. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
COLGATE4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:38 AM Response to Reply #11 |
24. K&R. People should look at the actual record rather than using |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:45 AM Response to Reply #24 |
29. That makes absolutely no sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipi_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 10:00 AM Response to Reply #29 |
39. And actually... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 10:11 AM Response to Reply #39 |
44. Exaclty. It doesn't give any weight to the claim that there was evidence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 02:55 PM Response to Reply #29 |
69. It does make sense. when you have sworn and crossed testimony, and then a recant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:06 PM Response to Reply #69 |
112. Oh, well. Of course, you go with the former and ignore the latter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:34 PM Response to Reply #112 |
126. I'm not disagreeing with your frustration. Merely explaining how courts work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:36 PM Response to Reply #126 |
127. No, that's not what you were doing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithlet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:39 PM Response to Reply #126 |
130. Well, yeah. How our courts work is a darn good reason to ditch the death penalty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 05:26 PM Response to Reply #130 |
151. I don't disagree that the DP should be done away with. But I don't think Davis is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:48 AM Response to Reply #24 |
31. It's Called Reasonable Doubt... And There Is Plenty Of It In This Case... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loyalsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 10:21 AM Response to Reply #31 |
49. Low standards of proof and participation should be an embarrassment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 10:00 AM Response to Reply #24 |
40. Yet the facts prove you are clueless. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipi_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 10:19 AM Response to Reply #40 |
47. Actually it looks like a lack of evidence is what's driving |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 11:49 AM Response to Reply #11 |
54. Then post the goods. You're not looking too credible right now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 02:16 PM Response to Reply #11 |
62. Hey! I have a 'yes/no' question for you to run away from! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:05 PM Response to Reply #11 |
110. so are you saying that Jimmy Carter and the former head of the FBI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 11:57 AM Response to Reply #1 |
56. the facts don't point to mr davis as the killer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Puregonzo1188 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:02 PM Response to Reply #1 |
107. I've been following this case for over four years. I know there is no physical evidence, just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realFedUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:15 AM Response to Original message |
3. Can Obama stop this execution? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:25 AM Response to Reply #3 |
10. My thought exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 10:24 AM Response to Reply #10 |
50. The president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-22-11 12:16 PM Response to Reply #50 |
172. Did he approach the Prosecutor then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
taught_me_patience (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 05:17 PM Response to Reply #3 |
148. This would be political suicide to even entertain this idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
my2sense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
4. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LAGC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:19 AM Response to Original message |
5. We should have learned our lesson after Texas (under Rick Perry's watch) executed an innocent man... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:31 AM Response to Reply #5 |
20. Deleted message |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:35 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:38 AM Response to Reply #20 |
25. yes, because I read something from the judge that convinces me he's guilty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:55 AM Response to Reply #25 |
36. In the death penalty, there's a HUGE burden put on the prosecution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 10:02 AM Response to Reply #25 |
41. Let's see it then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 10:06 AM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Evidence is so passe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipi_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 10:08 AM Response to Reply #25 |
43. Last I knew... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 10:17 AM Response to Reply #25 |
46. What was that something that you read? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 09:50 AM Response to Reply #5 |
32. That was Cameron Todd Willingham. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
48. Esp the Parole Board: They are appointees and they had discretion to commute the sentence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
51. i think jesus would agree with you...look what they did to him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 11:13 AM Response to Reply #51 |
53. thinking alike |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
52. Kick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shireen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 12:00 PM Response to Reply #52 |
57. ProdigalJunkMail assertions regarding this case are not credible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 12:37 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. Oh yes, I know this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 02:18 PM Response to Reply #58 |
63. That won't ever happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 02:05 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. It's a time-dishonored tactic of disinformationists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 02:59 PM Response to Reply #57 |
71. here's the ruling--PJM's assertions are indeed correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:02 PM Response to Reply #71 |
73. In no way are they correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:13 PM Response to Reply #73 |
75. Of course there's physical evidence--his attorney's are challenging it, right now, for a stay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:16 PM Response to Reply #75 |
78. Wouldn't you need to prove that Troy Davis actually, you know, used the gun first? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:29 PM Response to Reply #78 |
84. You don't need ballistics to prove someone handled a gun. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:31 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. Stop being so damned obtuse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:12 PM Response to Reply #85 |
116. the prosecution proved he used the murder weapon on the cop. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:14 PM Response to Reply #116 |
117. No they didn't. And if you truly believe that, SHOW US. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:34 PM Response to Reply #75 |
87. Zero physical evidence. You are horribly wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:37 PM Response to Reply #75 |
89. No murder weapon nor any DNA were recovered from the scene. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:39 PM Response to Reply #89 |
91. Well, ballistics evidence points to the cop most likely being shot by a man. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:53 PM Response to Reply #89 |
98. what you describe is physical evidence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:55 PM Response to Reply #98 |
99. Did you even read what you had responded to? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:51 PM Response to Reply #98 |
141. You are in 'way over your head as usual. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kctim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:00 PM Response to Reply #89 |
104. Who was the shooter in that other shooting? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:11 PM Response to Reply #104 |
115. Most likely one of the 2 remaining witnesses who didn't recant their story. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kctim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-22-11 08:44 AM Response to Reply #115 |
167. Then why was Davis also convicted of that crime? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-22-11 09:29 AM Response to Reply #167 |
169. He was railroaded for that crime so they could pin the other crime on him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kctim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-22-11 11:23 AM Response to Reply #169 |
171. Wow, I hadn't read that he was "railroaded" for the first crime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-22-11 01:59 PM Response to Reply #171 |
174. Same way they pinned the other one on him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:40 PM Response to Reply #75 |
92. Never mind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shireen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-22-11 03:58 PM Response to Reply #71 |
175. thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
64. Totally agree.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
66. It's murder. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skidmore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
83. How is this a political act when the case has made it to the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:38 PM Response to Reply #83 |
90. Because the Supreme Court is never political, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:43 PM Response to Reply #83 |
93. LOL !!! - MOST Of Politics Is Cover Your Ass... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zax2me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
95. His DEFENSE is political. Execution justice. Or, justice as our system sees it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 03:49 PM Response to Reply #95 |
97. NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:17 PM Response to Reply #95 |
118. killing a person will NEVER restore the life of anyone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countryjake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:42 PM Response to Reply #95 |
134. The whole damn system is guilty! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 07:04 PM Response to Reply #95 |
162. "Could not possibly care less" -- You don't care that there is a possibility a man will be murdered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 10:24 PM Response to Reply #95 |
165. So it would be ok with you for the state to put you to death, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
124. Totally. Just finished reading John Grisham's "The Confession." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
taught_me_patience (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
147. We're probably not getting all the facts of the case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 06:51 PM Response to Reply #147 |
160. The facts are that he was convicted with zero physical evidence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-21-11 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
166. How many times do I have to say this? Execution is NOT justice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-22-11 01:13 PM Response to Reply #166 |
173. ...and it doesn't prevent crime either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC