Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Entitlements? Damned right we're entitiled.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 06:00 PM
Original message
Entitlements? Damned right we're entitiled.
From Daily KOS

Right now, in today's political debate, the number one word we need to embrace: entitlement.

I see lots of arguments that by calling the core programs of our social safety net—Social Security and Medicare in particular—entitlements, we're somehow falling into the Republican trap, that it's already a dirty word and that by using it we're diminishing the importance of the programs.

Hogwash. Let's just get the basics here of what the word "entitled" means as it pertains to these programs: "a legal right or a just claim to receive or do something."

Legal right? Just claim? I think we've got that covered. By all means, there's a legal right and just claim to these monies by the people who have paid into the funds for their entire working lives.


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/09/18/1017981/-Entitled-Damned-right-were-entitled
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
31. paying into social security et al isn't entitlements. if that is the
definition then so are 401's and stock portfolios. If the same shit applied to them and they were told to go fuck themselves when they wanted to collect -MOOCHERS! ENTITLEMENT QUEENS!- that definition would disappear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. You are entitled to collect from later generations of workers.
Edited on Sun Sep-18-11 06:15 PM by dkf
As your grandparents and parents were entitled to collect funds from you.

That is the social contract that enables the funding of our social programs.

The question is if we've already spent the next generation into oblivion or not with our deficit plus our medical care plus our retirement.

Good luck to us collecting all that.


And if the government can't collect it, they will print it, which will depress the value of the funds meant to keep you afloat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Exactly
Edited on Sun Sep-18-11 06:13 PM by Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
These elders paid for our schooling and many other things while we were growing up. It's called being a part of a civilized society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yet there is a limit to what you can saddle others with.
At some point they just may rebel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrunkenBoat Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Well, the answer to your question is "No". So that settles that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Yes not entitled contractually, but morally if you believe kids should take care if their elders.
But I'm not sure that exists in our society anymore. How many kids open up their houses and pocket books to their parents nowadays? People prize their privacy more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrunkenBoat Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. That wasn't your question. Do you read your own posts? If not that would explain a lot.
Your question was:

"The question is if we've already spent the next generation into oblivion"

ANSWER IS NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Oops I confused the thread and thought it was a reference to the contractual obligation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-11 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
33. In the same sense that my parents were entitled to collect from me.
SS is insurance. If you pay the premiums, you're entitled to the benefits. The fact that most of those benefits are being financed by other people's premiums is immaterial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. I have read many a post on DU that claims it is not
our money and we are not entitled to anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Really?
I guess I've missed those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Really! They may be Rethugs posing as Democrats but
Edited on Sun Sep-18-11 06:24 PM by doc03
yes I have gotten in that argument with some here in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R. We do indeed have to destroy their reframing/demonization of our social rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Exactly right
It's a RIGHT, not just some "handout" that can be taken back at any time.

LAWS must be changed to reduce these benefits.

I'd LOVE to see any legal challenge to ANY reduction in benefits that goes right up to the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Actually once the trust fund "runs out" it can be reduced without legislation
Social security can only pay out if it has funds in it's account or if congress budgets it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrunkenBoat Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Social security isn't paid out of the Trust Fund. It's paid out of FICA taxes.
The Trust Fund represents an accumulation of unused FICA taxes, over & above the checks issued to retirees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. There is already more coming out than comes in through FICA taxes.
That extra comes out of the trust fund or has to be budgeted through the general fund.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrunkenBoat Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Only because of Obama's FICA cut. But since what's going out represents
Edited on Sun Sep-18-11 07:14 PM by DrunkenBoat
FICA taxes workers ALREADY PAID, who cares?

I really don't understand where you're coming from & why you think anything you're saying is important. Sounds like conservative talking points to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. It's how the system works for gods sakes. Geez.
Sometimes I wonder if facts matter for either party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrunkenBoat Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. The system doesn't run on the Trust Fund. That's a FACT, & I don't know why you're
trying to throw smoke up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. It does if the payments exceed the revenues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Flemming vs. Nestor
I'd love to see this one overturned.

A summary:

In this 1960 Supreme Court decision Nestor's denial of benefits was upheld even though he had contributed to the program for 19 years and was already receiving benefits. Under a 1954 law, Social Security benefits were denied to persons deported for, among other things, having been a member of the Communist party. Accordingly, Mr. Nestor's benefits were terminated. He appealed the termination arguing, among other claims, that promised Social Security benefits were a contract and that Congress could not renege on that contract. In its ruling, the Court rejected this argument and established the principle that entitlement to Social Security benefits is not contractual right.

http://www.ssa.gov/history/nestor.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paper Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. I paid for it, I am not entitled, I'm due my return!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Tell that to your kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrunkenBoat Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Better to tell it to the corprotacracy driving down their wages so they can skim off more of the
surplus.

The elephant in the room that you are so careful to avoid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Between employers and taxes, they have no chance at a really good life.
It's depressing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrunkenBoat Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. And the talking points don't help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
23. Fortunately, I am now collecting my entitlement.
I paid my social security taxes for more than 52 years and I am now entitled to that money. It is mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Force11 Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. Not so fast mr mines
The money you want should be there, yes, it should. Fact is, it's just not. It is not there. There is no piggy bank where all the money collected for SS goes to. We've all been conned by the greatest shell game ever perpetrated. In the real world, if you paid, you should be able to collect. When there are mo rules for politicians and no one is watching or cares much anyway, BAM! Stolen money from the public to pay their campaign supporting companies. You have been lied to. Bamboozeled, had, tricked, swindled, got, fooled. Trusting politicians to do what they say is like trusting your dog to not eat a steak on the floor when you leave the room. It's just going to happen. Term limits could help. No one should be in congress for 30 years mr. Mines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
25. Bush ripped off Fica to use in invading Iraq war...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
30. Speak for yourself, I do not feel myself to be entitled to a damn thing from anyone.
Edited on Sun Sep-18-11 08:16 PM by RB TexLa

whether I paid for it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-11 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. Of course you do.
Do you think you're entitled to benefits from the insurance company if your house burns down?

The fact that the benefit is primarily paid for by someone else's premiums is immaterial.

Social Security is insurance. If you experience the conditions for which the insurance indemnifies you, you are entitled to the prescribed benefit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-11 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. No I do not. I do not expect of others. Insurance companies find ways to not pay claims.
I accept this as fact. Sorry I don't have "I got to get mine," attitude toward life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC