Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More Ethics Trouble for Clarence Thomas

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 09:13 AM
Original message
More Ethics Trouble for Clarence Thomas

http://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/09/clarence-thomas-latest-ethics-trouble


If Clarence Thomas was hoping that liberals might just forget about his cozy ties to a Dallas real estate developer, or his failure for a decade to disclose the hundreds of thousands of dollars his wife earned from a conservative think tank, well, he would be wrong. As President Obama's health care reform bill gets closer and closer to a hearing before the high court, liberal groups are continuing to press for some sort of disciplinary action against Thomas, or at least to force him to recuse himself from hearing the health care case.

-snip-

Unfortunately, thanks the the separation of powers doctrine, there really isn't a higher authority when it comes to the Supreme Court. Some members of Congress are trying to change that. Also this week, the Alliance for Justice has been trying to rally support for congressional hearings on a bill introduced earlier this year that would force Supreme Court justices to be covered by the code of conduct that applies to other federal judges and create new procedures for when a justice may have to recuse from hearing a case. Given that virtually no Republicans have signed on, this law, too, has no hope of going anywhere, at least not any time soon. But the Democrats behind it get points for trying anyway.

*As a completely unrelated side note, Thomas came to mind as I was reading this article earlier this week about how NASCAR has started installing solar panels and recycling and employing flocks of sheep to mow the track lawns. I have to wonder whether Thomas, a former Monsanto employee, might have second thoughts about his anti-environmental positions now that even NASCAR has gone green. A little-known fact about Thomas is that in his spare time, he and Ginny drive their gas-guzzling, 40-foot custom-built bus to NASCAR races, where they hang out with ordinary Americans who often don't even recognize the Supreme Court's most bitter member. Perhaps some of NASCAR's new-found environmental consciousness will rub off.
------------------------

who knew!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. ReTHUGS didn't appoint him to the court without expecting
to cash in big time. 52-48 - I will never forget that.
I hope he ends up in prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Anita was right.... the dude is a PIG.....poor choice for the slot..
Edited on Sun Sep-18-11 09:19 AM by opihimoimoi
A waste of food...mo bettah make' baby time....

KnR #4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
searchingforlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Anita was robbed.
She was a victim of the prejudice of the times. White men supporting their token black man and party, fearing discovery that they too might be exposed for the same piggish behavior. Look at the era. Look at the attitudes toward women and especially accomplished, black women. She sat there day after day - calm, collected, intelligent responses given to each question. Then she went back to anonymity without a book or movie or TV career ambitions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R measly #2 for, I learned how to spell "measly" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. Actually there is a lot Congress can do.
They can Impeach the little man and try him for failing to disclose his wife's salary for years and years.

But of course there is this not looking back and always ignoring the crimes of the rich and powerful tradition in the federal government that keeps getting in the way.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. He should be impeached.
He has shown that he doesn't have the integrity to sit on the high court. Scalia, Alito and Roberts should also get impeached for their blatant political activities, and their efforts to transform rights and privileges in this country so that they benefit corporate entities above real people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-11 05:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. No need to impeach him. Clarence is prima facie indictable. Indict Clarence Thomas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. LOL, they cant even rescind the Patriot Act. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. Thomas and Scalia in 2000 FL vote case
Each one should have recused self.

Scalia had one son working for firm that argued Bush side in FL, one for firm arguing Bush side at Supreme Court.

Thomas' wife was working for Heritage Foundation to make list of possible people for Bush administration.

But who ever thought GOP and their hitmen believe in their self-righteously touted "rule of law."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Sometimes I wonder if America was overpowered from within.
And if I were to write the plot to the story, what a perfect crime if the new conquerors are convinced they're American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-11 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. That's close to what is really happening / has happened.
You or someone could write a bestseller about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. maybe he could be linked to a failed solar biz?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
9. knr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. every effort should be made by any one or group to humiliate & discredit this wretched Supreme. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. I dont think Thomas is worried. He knows the left is helpless and the admin is conservative. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-18-11 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
15. Slimy bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC