Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'A wonderful pilot, not a risk taker'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 02:52 PM
Original message
'A wonderful pilot, not a risk taker'
RENO, Nev. — Friends of an air racer and movie stunt pilot whose plane crashed into the edge of the grandstand at a show said the 74-year-old was a skilled airman and member of a tight-knit flying community.

Pilot Jimmy Leeward of Ocala, Fla., died in the crash Friday after apparently losing control of the P-51 Mustang, which spiraled into a box seat area at the National Championship Air Races at about 4:30 p.m. Friday. Leeward and at least two others were killed; dozens were injured.

Family members were at the air show and saw the crash, said Reno Air Races President and CEO Mike Houghton.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44559319/ns/us_news/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Press conference on CNN now - NTSB
Apparently he flew there for 36 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. There were seven fatalities on the ground including the pilot
plus the two at the hospital. Why did they hide those numbers last night?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Chaos
serious.

And listening to the emergency comms there were no blacks in their comms... so either they were not in the main channel... or they do not release until next of kin.

An MCI is controlled chaos...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Numbers differ from names so they would hold names until next of
kin were informed. How would they not know that seven were dead including the pilot.
Seems very strange to me and everyone is shocked at this sudden increase in the number of dead. Why would they not mention the six dead (plus the pilot) on the tarmac.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I saw the video
I could get really graphic, so I will leave this at this... propeller came off...

And I am not shocked, I expected it. Hell in the coming days two or three more dying in hospital would not surprise me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. We all expected the numbers to rise
I saw a horrific video last night as well. What I don't get is how six persons were killed on the tarmac and they didn't give those numbers last night. Were bodies burned as well? Are others still missing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Ok I will get graphic
since there was no explosion... no, not burns. They had to match body parts... to get the actual number of bodies... grizzly job. That actually can take time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. OK that makes sense
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yesterday, the local (Las Vegas) news was reporting
thirteen dead.

I think it was very confused for a while. Nothing odd about it, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. So how did twelve or thirteen become
Edited on Sat Sep-17-11 03:11 PM by malaise
two at the hospital plus the pilot, when we all knew that at least one man was cut in half.

sp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. I don't know - I wasn't there.
Based on images, it looks like much of the damage/injury occurred in a tented area. It's possible that it was initially simply too chaotic to get a good handle on who was alive and who was not.

As for where the deaths were reported, it may be that they waited for official pronouncement of death from the hospitals, even if it was very clear that the two victims who were announced first were clearly beyond help. Possibly because family members were there? (I remember my sister - a former paramedic - telling me that they were not allowed to call death in the field when she was working. I'm sure that has changed, but I think most of us still perceive emergency workers as the people who deliver injured people to hospitals, not the ones who pronounce death . . .)

I honestly don't know why the numbers changed so much, but I don't think it was some sort of deliberate attempt to downplay the severity of the incident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlimJimmy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. As I understand it, they knew about the pilot and one person on the ground
yesterday, then confirmed the others as the investigation went forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomb Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Interesting description of a man who does stunts. These are essentially "risky" around crowds, yes?
Edited on Sat Sep-17-11 03:00 PM by nomb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well depends...
I used to do rappelling (for rescue)... I could have gotten killed... I could have gotten killed in fire entry too. There are risks, and there are risks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomb Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I watched a line get cut on a jungle extraction once, 6 men dropped. This was not done for the crowd
Risks taken in line with ones purpose are quite different than risks taken to amuse the masses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Yeah but there are pilots who take more risks than others
that circuit is, at least to me, weird... but I enjoy the air show locally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlimJimmy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Yes, there are some dangers that are inherent to operations, and then some that are greater risks in
and of themselves. Rappelling is a controlled danger, with safety equipment designed to limit the risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Not really. I'm pretty good at parsing something down to the point I'm splitting
Edited on Sat Sep-17-11 03:17 PM by Cerridwen
hairs while dancing on the head of a pin.

But there are just times when words are implied rather than stated.

Implied words in this case might include:

unnecessary risks
excessive risks
risks relative to the day to day risk of getting out of bed...or flying a plane in a race

edit: cleaned up some grammar so ugly even I noticed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
19. Skilled enough to ground the plane to reduce casualties. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC