Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boeing 747-8 Hits ‘Horrendous’ Setback

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 02:15 PM
Original message
Boeing 747-8 Hits ‘Horrendous’ Setback

(Bloomberg) Boeing Co. (BA) had to postpone next week’s inaugural delivery of the 747-8 freighter, a jet already two years behind schedule, after its initial customer refused to accept the first two planes.

Boeing had to cancel three days’ worth of ceremonies and events beginning Sept. 19 because of “unresolved issues” with Cargolux Airlines International SA, said spokesman Jim Proulx. He declined to comment further on the reason for the dispute. The carrier was scheduled to fly its first load of freight on the new plane out of Seattle that same day.

The clash mars the arrival of the newest and biggest version of the jumbo jet that, with its iconic hump, has been Boeing’s marquis model since its inception in the 1960s. It also comes after numerous struggles at the company, including a three-year setback to its 787 Dreamliner, inroads into its customer base by Airbus SAS and a shift in its new-jet strategy.

“It’s horrendous,” said Ken Herbert, an analyst with Wedbush Securities in San Francisco, in an interview yesterday. “Just when you finally thought they were going to turn the corner, this happens.” ..............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-17/boeing-747-8-hits-horrendous-setback-as-buyer-delays-delivery.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. just reading the article makes me want to walk or drive to wherever
this plane is going to fly in its passenger carrying incarnation. I do not want to be on a plane with 467 other people, I just don't want to do that no matter how safe the plane is, no matter how courteous the flight crew is, no matter how many free drinks they will give out. Nope, ain't gonna do it.

If that means no go to Europe or Asia, oh well, ain't gonna do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's "marquee model" not "marquis model"..
/Commander Nitpick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. has to be some last-minute wrangling over the financials
Edited on Sat Sep-17-11 03:05 PM by Blue_Tires
it's not like the aircraft is unsafe or untested...

further discussion:
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/5256873/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. I have no pity for Boeing
None. Zip. They're just another cog in the war machine, as far as I'm concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. It sounds like a Microsoft Vista model
I don't think I'll be flying in one. I'll stick to the older planes.

The setbacks to the model are due in part to the 787 Dreamliner. Engineers were diverted to work on the composite- plastic Dreamliner as struggles with the new materials and its production system caused what amounted to seven delays. Flight tests then revealed other problems, including flutter in the wings and buffeting around the wheel wells, which had to be resolved. And work on the new flight-management computer extended the length of flight testing, eventually forcing Boeing to scale back the system to avoid further delays. A software upgrade is planned later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Boeing is paying a severe price for outsourcing its technology and manufacturing nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Cargolux is demanding compensation because Boeing missed fuel efficiency promises
It burns 4% more fuel than promised,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC