Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tea Party: People on unemployment benefits are lazy / Study: People on unemployment find work faster

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 06:49 AM
Original message
Tea Party: People on unemployment benefits are lazy / Study: People on unemployment find work faster
Edited on Sat Sep-17-11 07:10 AM by ck4829
Who to believe, the same crowd that calls Obama a Muslim Commie Nazi who was born in Kenya and have absolutely no evidence to back up their claims that the unemployed are lazy or a bunch of eggheads who use liberally biased things like math and the scientific method? Hmmm. Tough decision.


Tea Party Rep. Steve King (R-IA) took to the House floor yesterday to give a diatribe against large swaths of of the social safety net, from food stamps to heating fuel subsidies, but reserved particular disdain for unemployment insurance, which he dismissed as “welfare for people that won’t work.”

The former speaker of the House, Speaker Pelosi, has consistently said that unemployment checks are one of those reliable and immediate forms of economy recovery. <...> The 80 million Americans that are of working age but are simply not in the workforce need to be put to work. We can’t have a nation of slackers and then have me have to sit in the Judiciary Committee listening to them argue that there’s work that Americans won’t do, so we have to import people to do the work that Americans won’t do, and borrow money to pay the welfare for people that won’t work. That is a foolish thing for a nation to do. We’ve gotta get this country back to work and get those people out of the slacker rolls and onto the employed rolls.

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2011/09/16/321373/steve-king-unemployed-slackers/


This claim has also been echoed by Senator Rand Paul, Rep. Blake Farenthold, and by John Lott in an editorial on the Fox News website.

But what is the reality?

The Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco has this:


Figure 2 displays the resulting unemployment duration series for job losers and leavers/entrants from 2005 through the end of 2009. The vertical lines identify the start of the recession and the dates for the initiation and renewal of the extended UI benefits programs. Unemployment duration rose slightly in the early phase of the recession and then increased sharply after extended UI benefits became available, reaching a high of about 35 weeks in mid-2009 before declining back to about 30 weeks by the end of the year. Notably, the increase in expected duration was similar for job losers, the group that is eligible for UI benefits, and leavers and entrants, who are ineligible.

The similar increase in duration for the UI eligible and ineligible groups suggests that extended UI had only a limited impact on unemployment duration. As of the fourth quarter of 2009, the expected duration of unemployment had risen about 18.7 weeks for job losers and about 17.1 weeks for leavers and entrants, using the years 2006-2007 as a baseline. The differential increase of 1.6 weeks for job losers is the presumed impact of extended UI benefits on unemployment duration. It is straightforward to translate this increase in unemployment duration into an effect on the unemployment rate, based on their proportional relationship and adjusted for the share of job losers in overall unemployment, which was about 67% in December 2009. The implied increase in the unemployment rate is quite small, slightly less than 0.4 percentage point, indicating that without UI extensions, the measured unemployment rate would have been 9.6% in December 2009 rather than the observed 10.0%.



http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/letter/2010/el2010-12.html


The red line is people who are on unemployment, the blue line is people who are not on it. People on unemployment insurance usually find work faster than people on it, and even when they don't find work faster, the difference isn't by much. Why this is not told to us by the 'liberal' media is beyond me. Oh wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sam11111 Donating Member (638 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. JOB SHORTAGE is tallied by Bureau of Labor Statistics. Few jobs, many jobless
Edited on Sat Sep-17-11 07:18 AM by sam11111
Number of job openings ARE counted by the BLS.

Compare that small # with the # of jobless.

The FOX lie is centuries old and is totally refuted by this stat,

but many LW activists still need to learn this stat and use it on the RW types.

Blame for unemployment is with the Corporate economy.
Never have been eno jobs nationwide. Never.

WPA could end ALL unemployent in 4 months.. end it .... FOREVER.

There should always be a SURPLUS of jobs. Easy to do.

WPA. Easy.

Sweden kept unemp. low.. usually under one % all 30 yrs of Golden Age.. till the RW lied their way into power about 1991 - just like they did here 1980.

See my sig below for BLS stats I referred to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fantastic Anarchist Donating Member (953 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-11 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Awesome post!
Thanks for sharing. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC